Nmherman on Fri, 3 May 2002 00:51:01 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Love + Revolution/Revolution + Love - in which order |
Howdy Lachlan, you are officially one of the people who has at some point voluntarily reacted to the Genius 2000 Network and is at peace with it. Coeval peace. As for first/after, I view temporal sequence often by the idea of both at the same time in just proportion. NN calls it isotropic biomath, I refer to it mainly in literature and rhetoric. As with the two lines in an equal sign, = visually, when in fact we are discussing binarity at its most binaric basis. The savagery of reason/the reason of savagery, which was more important to Nietzche? Plus I'm not an amateur. The WSJ is the best reading around; today Fukuyama on the death of libertarianism and an article on how web bibliography is the new chief labor of scholars who use MLA. Plus I'm getting a label, new site, you name it, all up soon at genius2000.net. Is that self-promotion or information? I believe MLA rewards conformist writing first. In that regard I find a new network to be in order. This brand new network at GENIUS2000.NET will fund artists by selling portable health-care technology and socially ethical garments as well as other services. Take the survey please, Max Herman genius2000.net electrichands.com/genius2000 ++ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold