cpaul on Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:17:01 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] Fw: CDR: RE: Fw: <nettime> New Scientist: Microwave Crowd Dispersal Tested (ADT)




Begin forwarded message:

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:31:35 -0500 
From: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei@rsasecurity.com>
To: "'cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com'" <cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Subject: CDR: RE: Fw: <nettime> New Scientist: Microwave Crowd Dispersal Tested (ADT)



> > On Thursday, November 1, 2001, at 07:12 PM, cpaul wrote:
> > 
> > > aluminum foil?
> 
> > > http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/tech/heatison.jsp
> > >
> > > Microwave beam weapon to disperse crowds
> 
> 
> 
> i've been following the development of this skin heating
> device for a while, and am keen to learn if there may be
> an effective means to counter its use.
> 
> the new scientist article suggests that the cornea is not
> as resilient as skin when it comes to being bombarded with
> microwaves, hence i seek opinions on how one might protect
> oneself.


Leather or wet clothes may shield most of the body. A wild 
guess to protect the eyes would be something that puts a 
transparent conductive material over them - mirror 
sunglasses, the mylar glasses used for eclipse observations 
(though you could not see anything else through them :-(), 
or the conductive, mostly transparent plastic material 
which is used to package static sensitive electronic components.
Another possibility is to make goggles out of metal flyscreen -
since the wavelength is 3mm, it's doubtful that they can penetrate.
Chain mail would also work for the body.

Peter










_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold