silviu dancu on Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:41:22 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Nettime-ro] COMRADES OF TIME at PAVILION UNICREDIT |
Salut, materialul imi place cum suna, dar nu vad numele IP-ului intre parteneri :)))) 2010/2/11 PAVILION [contemporary art & culture magazine] < pavilion@pavilionmagazine.org> > > PAVILION UNICREDIT > > /for English please scroll down > > 18 Februarie - 28 Aprilie, 2010 > > COMRADES OF TIME > Expozitie > > DESCHIDERE OFICIALA 18 February, 19.00 > > Participanti: Zbynek Baladran (CZ), Grigor Khachatryan (AM), Anna Molska > (PL), Ioana Nemes (RO), Skart (SRB), Clemens von Wedemeyer (DE) > > Curator: Joanna Sokołowska > > "A fi con-temporan nu inseamna neaparat a fi prezent, a te afla aici si > acum; inseamna sa fii mai degraba "alaturi de timp" decat "in timp". In > germana "con-temporan" se spune "zeitgenössisch". Cum Genosse inseamna > "tovaras", con-temporan - zeitgenössisch - poate fi tradus prin "tovaras al > timpului", cel care colaboreaza cu timpul si il ajuta atunci cand are > probleme, cand intampina greutati." Boris Groys > > De ce devin artistii contemporani niste "tovarasi ai timpului" atat de > activi si intervin asupra lui in asemenea moduri, incat il incadreaza in > metanaratiunile istorice implicite în spaţiile sociale contemporane? > Expoziţia asociază întrebarea de mai sus cu practicile artistice care > implică dileme puse de reprezentarea, rememorarea şi actualizarea trecutului > din perspectiva proiectelor modernitatii socialiste si comuniste. In > lucrarile artistilor pot fi detectate doua moduri de gandire principale si > interconectate. Pe de o parte avem o reflectie asupra posibilelor sensuri > ale straturilor istorice prezente in arhitectura si in alte forme de > organizare a vietii, ce investigheaza in particular modul in care istoria > este transmisa si mediatizata. Astfel, aici centrul de interes il reprezinta > conditiile contemporane de producere a experientei trecutului. Pe de alta > parte se pune un accent puternic pe meditatia asupra aspectului emancipator > al modernităţii ca proiect neterminat. Din aceasta perspectiva există o > nevoie urgenta de evaluare a potentialului actual al modernitatii si, > concomitent, de analiza critica a erorilor sale. > > Proiectele ideologice moderniste pot fi observate cu o intensitate speciala > in procesul de constructie si in actiunile de distrugere si reconstructie > legate inexorabil de scrierea istoriei si de un control asupra memoriei. > "Naratiunea si constructia", noteaza Ricoeur "creeaza un gen similar de > imprimare: una in longevitatea timpului, cealalta in trainicia materialelor. > Fiecare noua cladire se inscrie in spatiul urban ca o naratiune intr-un > cadru intertextual". Distrugerea poate sterge sau suspenda in timp istorii > vechi, anuntand astfel declansarea unor noi naratiuni. Procesul de producere > si reproducere a spatiului social in care functioneaza structura, > arhitectura si forma urbana in evolutie constituie o provocare interesanta > pentru artisti, in masura in care acestia il interpreteaza ca pe un > palimpsest compus nu doar din straturi spectaculare, vizibile si materiale, > spatio-temporale, ci si dintr-o multitudine de straturi invizibile si > imateriale asezate unul peste celalalt. Artistii nu sunt interesati atat de > dezvaluirea si prezentarea unui text care s-ar putea sa fi existat odata, ci > de codarea sau reactivarea lui, expunandu-l contextului actual in care el ar > putea reaparea. Aceasta e situatia in care artistii devin tovarasi activi ai > timpului, caci combina fara restrictii cadre recunoscute din descrierile > istorice si inventeaza noi traiectorii pentru evenimentele trecutului. Fiind > interesati de caracterul complex al dorintei de a captura trecutul, > realizeaza transformari in sensurile alocate acestuia, utilizand, de > exemplu, metoda repetitiei sau a remake-urilor. De fapt repetitia este de > fiecare data o actualizare recenta a conditiilor de productie ce apar la o > noua prelucrare a trecutului. > > Explorarea in spatiul social contemporan a ramasitelor unei utopii > pierdute, demers prezent in lucrarile lui Clemens von Wedemeyer > ("Silberhöhe", "Die Siedlung"), Zbyněk Baladrán ("Glossary", "Socio-fiction > II") si Grigor Khachatryan ("Churches"), este legata de problema > transmiterii actului de imaginare si reamintire a lor cu ajutorul diverselor > imagini si a feluritelor tehnologii utilizabile in domeniul culturii > vizuale: filmele de fictiune, cele documentare si de televiziune. Analizand > imaginile prin diverse moduri ale "reproductibiitatii lor tehnice" ei ajung > la esenta imaterialului contemporan si aspectul afectiv al economiei ce > genereaza in primul rand imagini si dorinte mediate. > > Problema potentialului contemporan de emancipare a ideilor revolutionare, a > socialismului si comunismului, precum si rolul artei in transformarea > societatii, sunt abordate si in lucrarile lui Škart ("Our Miracle") si Anna > Molska ("W=F*S (Work)", "P=W:t (Power)") si Zbyněk Baladrán. Ce conditii > declanseaza astazi insasi necesitatea de a pune astfel de intrebari? > Sugestia artistilor ajunge chiar la esenta polemicii despre problema > comunismului in istoria societatilor care l-au trait: sa fie eliminat > complet sau sa fie tratat pur si simplu ca o eroare, o falie temporara in > nazuinta universala spre capitalism? Aceasta amnezie, laolalta cu absenta > unor noi orizonturi politice, a constituit unul dintre prezumtivii factori > ce au facilitat dominatia paradigmei actuale, in care antagonismele sunt > atenuate. > Forta sentimentelor negate poate conduce la fantezia reconstruirii > traditiilor pierdute, anistorice, stabile si "autentice", in sensul descris > de Svetlana Boym prin sintagma "nostalgie restauratoare", si la "intoarcerea > reprimatului". Škart si Anna Molska ne propun sa ne incheiem conturile cu > trecutul intorcandu-ne la el si verificandu-i elementele in momentul actual. > > Investigarea de catre artisti a modurilor de reamintire, uitare sau > reactivare a ideilor revolute ale modernitatii socialiste, ale caror > elemente inca mai contribuie la edificarea spatiilor in care traim, permite > o reevaluare a potentialului contemporan al artei in raport cu noua economie > existenta, cu formele de organizare a vietii si cu initierea unor experiente > colective. > > Publicatie: "Tovarasi ai timpului", cu texte de Joanna Sokolowska, Boris > Groys, Juli Carson. > Publicatie editata de PAVILION - journal of politics and culture, > Engleza/Romana, 80 pagini, B/W, 13,5 x 18,5 cm, softcover, 7 EURO/19 RON. > > This project is supported by POLISH INSTITUTE BUCHAREST. > > > Imagine: Grigor Khachatryan, Churches, 1997, video still, courtesy of the > artist. > > > --- > > > 18 February - 28 April, 2010 > > COMRADES OF TIME > Exhibition > > OPENING 18 February, 19.00 > > Participants: Zbynek Baladran (CZ), Grigor Khachatryan (AM), Anna Molska > (PL), Ioana Nemes (RO), Skart (SRB), Clemens von Wedemeyer (DE) > > Curator: Joanna Sokołowska > > "To be con-temporary (...) means to be "with time" rather than "in time." > "Con-temporary" in German is "zeitgenössisch." As Genosse means "comrade," > to be con-temporary--zeitgenössisch--can thus be understood as being a > "comrade of time"--as collaborating with time, helping time when it has > problems, when it has difficulties." (Boris Groys) > > Why do contemporary artists become such active "comrades of time" > intervening in the ways in which time is framed by the historical > meta-narratives implicit in contemporary social spaces? The exhibition > relates this question to artistic practices that confront dilemmas posed by > the representation, remembrance and actualisation of the past as far as it > concerns projects of socialist and communist modernity. In the artists' > works, two principal interconnected modes of thought can be detected: on the > one hand, a reflection on the possible meanings of the layers of history > present in architecture and other forms of the organisation of life, in > particular questioning the way history is mediated and medialised. Thus, the > focus here is on the contemporary conditions of the production of the > experience of the past. On the other hand, a strong emphasis is also placed > on thinking about the emancipatory aspect of modernity as an unfinished > project. From this perspective, the urgent need is to assess modernity's > present-day potential and at the same time critically examine its mistakes. > > Modernist ideological projects can be seen with especial intensity in the > construction process, in acts of destruction and rebuilding that are > inexorably linked with the writing of history and a policing of memory. > "Narrative and construction," notes Ricoeur, "bring about a similar kind of > inscription, the one in the endurance of time, the other in the enduringness > of materials. Each new building is inscribed in urban space like a narrative > within a setting of intertextuality". Destruction can erase or suspend old > histories in time, and thus announce the inception of new narratives. The > process of the production and reproduction of the social space in which the > evolving urban fabric, architecture and design function forms an interesting > challenge for artists, in as much as they interpret it as a palimpsest > composed not just of spectacular, visible and physical temporo-spatial > layers, but also of multiple invisible and immaterial strata piled on top of > one another. Artists are not so much concerned with the uncovering and > presentation of an erased text that may once have existed, but encode or > reactivate it, exposing the current context in which it might emerge. It is > here that artists are active comrades of time, mixing frames recognized from > descriptions of history and inventing new trajectories for past events. > Interested in the complex nature of the desire to grasp the past, they > perform transformations on the senses ascribed to it, making use, for > example, of the method of repetition or remakes. Repetition is in fact an > actualization of the conditions of production that emerge from a reworking > of the past. > > The exploration of the traces of a lost utopia in contemporary social space > that is present in the works of Clemens von Wedemeyer ("Silberhöhe", "Die > Siedlung") , Zbyněk Baladrán ("Glossary", "Socio-fiction II") and Grigor > Khachatryan ("Churches") is connected with a question as to the mediation of > the imagining and remembering of them through the different images and > various technologies operative in the field of visual culture: fiction and > documentary films, video and television. Probing images through different > modes of their "technical reproducibility" they get to the very heart of the > contemporary immaterial and affective aspect of an economy that generates > first and foremost mediated images and desires. > > The question of the contemporary emancipatory potential of revolutionary > ideas, of socialism and communism, and the role of art in the transformation > of society are taken up in the works of Škart ("Our Miracle") Anna Molska > ("W=F*S (Work)", "P=W:t (Power)") and Zbyněk Baladrán. What conditions > produce the need to even ask such questions today? The artists` suggestions > can be seen within the discussions of the problem of the erasing of > communism from the history of the societies that experienced it, or the > simple treating of it as a mistake, a temporary break in the universal > striving towards capitalism. This amnesia and the lack of new political > horizons was one of the factors supposed to facilitate the domination of the > current paradigm in which antagonisms are subdued. The strength of negated > sentiments can lead to the fantasy of reconstructing lost, a-historical, > stable and "true" traditions in the sense described by Svetlana Boym as > "restorative nostalgia" and to an explosive "return of the repressed." The > artists propose a working through of the past through returning to it and > testing its elements today. > > Their work on modes of recalling, forgetting or reactivating the former > ideas of socialist modernity, elements of which still contribute to the > production of the spaces in which we live, enables a reassessment of the > contemporary potential of art in relation to the new economy, to forms of > organisation of life and to the initiation of collective experiences. > (Extras from the publication "Comrades of Time") > > Publication: "Comrades of Time", with texts by Joanna Sokolowska, Boris > Groys, Juli Carson. > Published by PAVILION - journal of politics and culture, English/Romanian, > 80 pages, B/W, 13,5 x 18,5 cm, softcover, 7 EURO / 19 RON. > > This project is supported by POLISH INSTITUTE BUCHAREST. > > > Image: Grigor Khachatryan, Churches, 1997, video still, courtesy of the > artist. > > > --- > PAVILION UNICREDIT > center for contemporary art & culture > > Sos. Nicolae Titulescu 1 (Piata Victoriei) > Bucharest 011131 Romania > T: + 4 031 103 4131 > E: pavilion@pavilionmagazine.org > www.pavilionunicredit.ro > > Facebook: www.facebook.com/pavilionjournal > > --- > PAVILION UNICREDIT este un centru pentru arta si cultura contemporana, un > spatiu independent work-in-progress, spatiu de productie si cercetare a > vizualului, a discursivului si a performativului. Este un spatiu al gandirii > critice care promoveaza o întelegere implicata socio-politic a artei si a > institutiilor culturale. > > PAVILION UNICREDIT is a center for contemporary art & culture, a > work-in-progress independent space, a space for the production and research > in the fields of audiovisual, discursive and performative. It is a space of > the critical thinking, and it promotes an artistic perspective implying the > social and political involvement of the art and of the cultural > institutions. > > --- > > This is a project by PAVILION - journal for politics and culture. > www.pavilionjournal.org > > --- > PAVILION, BUCHAREST BIENNALE and PAVILION UNICREDIT are projects devised > and founded by Razvan Ion and Eugen Radescu > > --- > Supported by: UniCredit Tiriac Bank > Strategic partner: Pilsner Urquell > Partners: Center for Visual Introspection, Tanga Project, ADD, Paradis > Garaj, laBomba, Romanian Cultural Institute, Austrian Cultural Forum, > Media partners: Afterall, Framework, Radical Philosophy, Springerin, Radio > Romania Cultural, 22, Alternativ.ro, Feeder.ro, 24Fun, Modernism.ro, > Arhitectura > Production partner: UpDate Advertising > Printing partner: First Advertising Agency > Audio-visual partner: Sony > > --- > To unsubscribe click this link > To forward this message click this link > > _______________________________________________ > Nettime-ro mailing list > Nettime-ro@nettime.org > http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ro > --> > arhiva: http://amsterdam.nettime.org/ > _______________________________________________ Nettime-ro mailing list Nettime-ro@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-ro --> arhiva: http://amsterdam.nettime.org/