scotartt on Fri, 28 May 1999 18:59:06 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> 'refused classification' call for artwork (was: australian anti-autonomous antipathy) |
Geert Lovink wrote: > > good good! tell us what we could do Per my previous message about the BROADCASTING SERVICES AMENDMENT (ONLINE SERVICES) BILL 1999; this is is more specific about the sort of collaboration we seek with artists in Australian and Overseas. What Autonomous Organisation essentially hopes to do is to publish deliberately provocative material, e.g stuff based on porn, erotic texts, art work concerning sex-death and other taboo matters, blasphemy, extreme speech, Government secrets and political matters, and other like matter. Our preference is for detournement of the material, for artistic and quasi-legalistic reasons. even just one picture/story/contribution if that's all you've got time for is great! We would also like to use our namespace to contain a number of autonomously run sites. We'd like to ask people to donate small amounts of webspace and a single IP to the autonomous.org namespace. We point to yoursite.autonomous.org which contains whatever you like about the above. You have full access to our archives as items are contributed to it. We're looking at not just porn either -- information e.g anarchists cookbook; also in the 80s i remember a panphlett i read called "beyond NATO and the Warsaw Pact" or somesuch. it discussed how to organise a civilian militia defence against, ostensibly the invading warsaw pact armies, -- it had stuff like how to build a tank-trap, military tactics at demos, and things like that, if anyone can source an electronic copy of this i'd love it! bomb plans, political and other polemics, anything of that nature is also considered. When it comes to the crunch, we are considering using the envelope of technology to counter the law. even after they "take down" our own sites internally and even e.g. mirrors of it (obviously by forcing the issue on me as a person), how will the law cope with the idea that all we control in australia is a DNS entry in an international domain that points to an offensive site and our own website just redirects you there? Any ideas that may help us with this final defence are also welcome! thanks scot. PS please pass this email along to others who may be interested, its probably better at explaining the practical whys and wherefores of the help we seek than the original announcement. -- >}} sysx sysx.apana.org.au sysx.autonomous.org autonomous.org {{< "It's like a record needle cuts a groove into the brain." >{{ http://autonomous.org/soundsite http://mp3.com/nerveagent }}< --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl