Josephine Bosma on Fri, 25 Sep 1998 18:14:24 +0200 (MET DST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> POST-MEDIA OPERATORS |
>> POST-MEDIA OPERATORS << Howard Slater Keywords: distribution listener operator dance 1. The record industry is in the process of being outflanked by means of the very practices that it has come to rely upon. Since the 60s its continual efforts to create new needs has meant that it nurtured an ever changing musical soundscape that is now mutating at such a pace that it cannot keep pace long enough to harness these musical evolutions in the direction of profit. That it doesn't achieve this harnessing has the remarkable effect of making the 'new' last longer! A longevity that comes from our always being able to place ourselves amidst a continual redefinition of these sounds. The profit-orientated shift to a CD market, which allowed back catalogues to be resold, has thus worked to deliver an on-line tap of musical history at the same time that vinyl pressing has become cheaper. These and other factors feed into the accelerating mutation that propels a dissatisfaction with what the industry can offer. 2. Advancements in technology have meant that all manner of equipment is now available for reappropriation by whoever has the time to learn how to misuse it. That there can no longer be any 'one sound' around which music is organised means that everything is potential source material to a practice that no longer calls itself music. Indeed, the former categories that were allotted to different musics now only make sense as a means of division; a consumer yardstick that limits stimulation. From the guitar we have moved through sampling technology, turntables, analogue and digital keyboards to an indiscernible melange that creates further possibilities for interaction as well as enhanced and de-legitimated conditions of reception. Such practices escape the institutional control of the industry and the media, eluding the 'dominant repressive models' of an inherited subjectivity: music reveals individual consciousness as socially situated. 3. Ever since 'music' got rid of the necessity for lyrics, the predominance of an electronic music of texture, unrestricted tonality and rhythmic paroxysm meant that it liberated those who heard it to listen intently to unrecognisable rhythms and sounds. Occurring in the context of dance music meant that such heightened listening was as sensual as it was cerebral and because these sounds took people in uncharted directions they became situated as part of a collective desire that predisposed them to each other, inspiring movements towards new forms of collectivity. The liberation of the listener, through dance, led not only to this growing sociality, the collective memory of tracks, but, with the music foregrounding a repetition that placed message and resolution in abeyance, it created conditions where desiring-energy was perpetuated and deployed in the direction of discovery and self-creation. 4. As a consequence there are more people making music now than at any time before and awareness of this amongst composers has led to an international explosion of small-label activity. These people have heard the tales of music scene has-beens and, rather than choose competition, exposure and the 'labour of success', they have decided to operate outside these monetary and conceptual constraints and do their own thing. Inspired by the free-party scene, small-run pressings of records are passed around through underground distribution networks at a level that eludes even the most 'specialist' of record shops. In the slipstream of this there has been a rise in an experimental attitude: no longer needing to conform to what is expected and 'understood' means that there has been a renewed appreciation for the idiosyncrasies of sound and the transgression of perceptual habits these can inspire. Meanwhile, A&R men scurry from club to gig but never reach the parties. Attracted to a music that conforms to cash projections, that reproduces the social imaginary, they can never hear the sound of conflictual desire. Similarly the music press is increasingly losing its mediating role between unknown composers and the major labels which makes its promotion of the 'new' laughable. The 'new' is now passing-by unnoticed and makes such attempts to hold onto what has been declared 'new' the very indication that what we read is inflected by dispassionate opportunism: marketing. 5. The Post-Media practice has been accelerated by the InterNet where obsessions can run rife and where there is a noticeable desire for those miniaturised activities that thrive without giving a thought to the increasingly 'calm perspectives' of a transparent media. The media, like the record industry, has become a centralised zero. Where once magazines and labels may have acted as a filter or a means of dissemination, market forces have made these all converge on the centre-ground: the public listens to what is made available... and what the audience happens to listen to, since it was being offered, reinforces certain tastes (*). Mistaken as cutting-edge, the music promoted by the media often serves no other purpose than the maintenance of a profitable illusion. Caught in this mystifying spiral listeners either attempt to break-loose and do it for themselves or, having their senses dulled, become bored and unable to orientate themselves within the media-trap of publicity and failed promise. The latter become as enervated and cynical as the articles they read, and taking their place in the aging process, they see in the next cycle of mediated-music a lack of innovation and quality. 6. Innovation and quality? It is interesting to see how the media, which sees itself operating in opposition to high-art, comes to work in consort with this traditionalism, particularly through the way that it reinforces reactionary notions of subjectivity. Foremost amongst these shared techniques is the way that music, like art, is more or less always portrayed as transcendental; as isolated from the social conditions that produce, celebrate and receive it. This individualistic means of relating to music is accentuated by the reliance on 'genius': the elevation of certain individuals and the furthering of hierarchic devices in the supposedly 'free-space' of popular music. This accent on the unique can result in subduing the activities of others and in a denial of inter-relatedness that adds up to making the practice and heterogeneous reception contexts that surround music invisible. Whatsmore, this has the contingent effect of privileging the 'solitary' moment of production over that of listening and dancing which always imply the presence of others. In this way the contagious effects of music that can be conducted through sound are made tame. The media inhibits, or even worse, removes desire from music and in so doing colludes with the 'capitalisation' of subjectivity: one space, one time, one person just one step ahead of boredom. 7. This musical contagion has been gradually enhanced by the new conditions of reception and no small part of this post-media practice has been stimulated by the growing sense that listening is not a subordinate activity but a process of making-meaning. Listeners become part of an autonomous, diffuse and non-institutional reception context. This quite complex configuration means that rather than the 'new' and the 'unheard-of' being consumed voraciously in a frenzy of consumption they are turned into consoles that produce energy; impulsional exchanges that stimulate a practice of non-verbal thought. If listening is taken this seriously it can only encourage patterns of connection and co-experience with an immediately accessible group that shares not only an appreciation of the sounds but a social-memory of them as contained within the record. Once linked in this way the bonds of a new collectivity become instinctual. 8. And so, comprised of ephemeral organisations, post-media becomes a practice of fiction that knows no bounds. It is a web-site, a zine, a record label, a distribution network of unseen nodes... it is a de-channeled, meta-categorical social practice of cultural creation made entirely for and on its own terms! It is driven by enthusiasm, search and connection towards a polyphonic subjectivity! Rational modes of discourse like journalism and writing theses, which act to stabilise and make things remain still long enough for them to become systemised, lack a sense of music as a fuel that traverses disparate regions. Within this post-media practice there is an intensified redefinition of such dualisms as success/failure where respect and support is given to those who succeed in creating, at personal cost, something that is illegitimate and dissensual. In this way judgment of its value, whether it is 'good' or 'bad', is rendered useless. But such scenes, operating intimately, cannot afford to establish such divisions: listeners becomes producers. All scenes become their own genre and operating in a dispersed geographic and psychic space there is no sense of any one person or group being in control: it is a practice of addition without accumulation, a group-effusion of singularity that dispenses with individualism. In the past one of the main drawbacks has been that such affirmative practices have felt the need to be delimited as regions where protagonists should be made visible to one another. The onset of the InterNet has put paid to this by extending our expectations of communication, transposing a virtual space of music into an actuality of intimacy and an ever present potential for subjective change. Howard Slater Title adapted from Felix Guattari's phrase 'post-media era'. (*) Michel Foucault: Foucault Live, Semiotext(e) 1989, p393. Biography: Howard Slater is the editor of Break/Flow and a contributor to Autotoxicity, Datacide, Obsessive Eye and the Circuit 8 website (http//:c8.com) snail mail: 89 Vernon Road, London, E15 4DQ - --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl