Geert Lovink on Sat, 12 Oct 96 09:22 MET |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
nettime: Sabine Helmers: xs4all and xs2all |
Xs4all and xs2all About the German-Dutch 'Radikal' Case Written for ZKP3 @ Metaforum III, Budapest From: Sabine Helmers, Berlin http://duplox.wz-berlin.de/=20 October 7th, 1996 The grandparents used to tell us kids stories about times in Germany when it was strictly forbidden to listen to=20 BBC radio news. Our grandparents hid their radio in the=20 basement of their house and only dared to turn it on with low volume. The family sat closely around the radio and=20 received illegal British broadcast about battles and=20 political information during World War II.=20 The grandchildren could hardly believe those radio stories.=20 We were too young to understand the full meaning of the=20 story and its context. But from our point of view we=20 understood that our grandparents hated censorship because=20 we children had our own experiences with it - our parents=20 did not allow us to watch TV series like "The Avengers". Today I am a parent myself and I censor my little=20 daughter's TV consumption in order to protect her from=20 nightmares and square eyes caused by watching telly all too=20 intensely. I am responsible for my daughter who is too=20 young to make her owni decisions. The German Federal Prosecutor is not my father and I am=20 not a child anymore. In order to prevent me from=20 receiving information on Internet which is illegal in=20 Germany, the Federal prosecutor is trying to press Internet=20 providers to keep that information out of my reach. =20 In August 1996, the German Federal Prosecutor wrote=20 to German Internet providers and on-line services telling=20 them that they could possibly be charged with aiding and=20 abetting persons who are currently the subject of a=20 preliminary inquiry by the German Federal Prosecutor due=20 to an article published in a magazine which offended German=20 anti-terrorism laws.=20 The German Federal Prosecutor wrote (excerpt):=20 "Under the following Internet addresses ... [the GFP names=20 two WWW sites] ..the complete issue is available... [of=20 the Radikal magazine who is subject of preliminary inquiry=20 by the GFP. The GFP explains why they deem the text to be=20 illegal in Germany]... We want you to be aware that you are possibly making yourself liable to prosecution by acting=20 as an accessory to criminal offences [according to German=20 anti-terrorist laws =A7=A7 129a,3 and 130a,1 StGB] if you=20 allow the text to be accessed via your Internet dial-ins=20 and host computers."=20 Although the German Federal Prosecutor merely pointed=20 out the possibility of being liable to prosecution and=20 although the opinion of the GFP as expressed in the letter=20 has not as of yet been proven right by a court decision,=20 several German providers responded to the letter by=20 temporarily closing off the WWW sites where the electronic=20 version of the article was previously available to Internet=20 readers. From the point of view of a WWW site, for example=20 xs4all.nl in the Netherlands, the action of German providers=20 (among them the largest German providers) means a blockage=20 of all of their WWW information for a great number of=20 German netizens because of a single web page among the thousands of pages xs4all offers at their site.=20 It is practically impossible to filter the flow of data=20 in order to keep specific WWW pages which are stored on=20 WWW sites in other countries outside of the German state=20 territory when Germans are allowed to contact these=20 countries by phone for example - unless the German government decided upon massive censorship measurements which would=20 be not according to German Laws as they are today. =20 Xs4all is rotating IP numbers, and most of German netizens=20 never had any problems accessing www.xs4all.nl and the=20 illegal Radikal issue. Internet technology all in all=20 withstands censorship attempts.=20 Despite the pleasant fact that censorship is impossible,=20 the actions taken by the German Federal Prosecutor and=20 German Internet Providers should not be left uncommented. Written inquiries were made by Elly Plooij=20 (Europarliament-VVD) at the European Commission. The=20 Electronic Frontier Foundation released a Global Alert,=20 "GERMAN GOVERNMENT PUSHES BLOCKAGE OF NETHERLANDS WEB=20 SITES". People sent letters of protest to German providers,=20 the Federal Prosecutor and German Embassies abroad. Many=20 mirror sites for the censored Radikal magazine were installed.=20 Contemporary Germany wants to participate in the European=20 Community as a civilized and liberal member state and it=20 is not at all my intention to parallelize today's=20 situation with the Nazi times. But do you understand=20 that I - after receiving the news about this censorship=20 attempt - was reminded of childhood stories told to me=20 by my grandparents? =20 I really would wish that today people would at least=20 always consider the political importance of Freedom of=20 Information in a historical context when they think of=20 banning texts from the state's territory and of preventing=20 self-responsible adults from reading information. If you wish to support the letter of protest at=20 http://duplox.wz-berlin.de/people/s/decl.html, please=20 send mail, contaning your name and city you live in=20 with subject "signing declaration about censorship"=20 to tuamotu@duplox.wz-berlin.de. -- * distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission * <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, * collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets * more info: majordomo@is.in-berlin.de and "info nettime" in the msg body * URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@is.in-berlin.de