Alex Foti on Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:07:23 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> EUgoslavia |
is the fucking old eee-you coming apart at the seams? ok britain's out but it would like to veto the embryo of a EU army (something also the neutralist but otherwise europhile Irish abhor). renzi did a photo opportunity with merkel and hollande at the grave of european federalism (ventotene, where spinelli is buried), but the triumvirate didn't last a month and in bratislava were were back to the usual diarchy that has been running europe since its foundation. juncker is a faithful butler of German interests couched in european rhetoric. problem is Europe is now made not of 10 or 12 countries, but of 27. The Visegrad countries are in effect putting themselves outside the EU by not accepting a single migrant. Italy and Greece are taking in the majority of refugees while all borders to their north are being sealed from Calais to Ventimiglia, from Brenner to the Carpathians. Being outside the eurozone, they didnt have lead on their wings and EU funds have made them fly. Inside the eurozone, quantitative easing is too little too late and anyway the Germans want to reverse it. As we now know, this expansionary monetary policy has adverse effects on equality as it props us financial assets but does not expand employment enough to raise wages. Fiscal policy would, but neither Schaueble nor Draghi are ready to countenance deficit spending: they both defend European rentiers and pensioners. Politically, the eurozone lacks cohesion (save for bloodletting Greece) but in my view the only hope for Europe is that the euro area becomes some kind of con/federal state and we can trade freely with whoever wants out, but free-riders will no longer be able to stop further political integration. But can a disqualified eurocracy commanded by the discordant concert of government heads lead such a process? No way. In fact today being associated to Europe has become an electoral liability, as it means migration (rightwing view) and austerity (leftwing view) so it's hard to envisage how the same people who gave europe a bad rep are gonna solve the problem they caused. Today there is a power vacuum at the heart of Europe. The most likely development is that there is a return to nation-states and that nationalist forces stand to benefit from this. Buy Italian, buy Belgian, buy French has never been stronger. People are going inward and dream of an impossible autarky. For instance, the practice of giving foreign names to kids in Italy has mysteriously stopped: gone are the days when Justins and Jennifers were all over the place, now it's only Mario and Ludovica.. Egalitarian/libertarian populism (podemos/ en comu) is the only viable ideological response to this historical predicament. But as gerbaudo reminds us, populism stresses national sovereignty and so lacks a transnational project for europe. So the alternative would be to federate all progressive forces and mobilize for a grand political design to liberate Europe from inequality and xenophobia. What's the Europe we want? What kind alliances between cities and regions can take us there? How do we construct a popular european culture? Should we start a European Liberation Movement? Can the organization of the precariat provide the social counterpart of a transnational political project? I dunno. What i do know is that Europe � la carte is over. And a rump schengen europe is not unlikely. 2017 will be a year of fateful decisions, certainly for the french and germans who will choose the next president and chancellor. best ciaos from northern milano lx
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: