www.nettime.org Nettime mailing list archives
| martin hardie on Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:07:41 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> [re] WIPO sneak trashes NGO dox |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More from [Commons-Law] High Drama at the WIPO
Date: Friday 19 November 2004 16:07
From: "Shyamkrishna Balganesh" <skbalganesh {AT} rediffmail.com>
To: commons-law {AT} sarai.net
This is an update on developments at the WIPO negotiations before the SCCR on
the new Broadcast Treaty at Geneva. I'm here representing the Union for the
Public Domain (UPD), an international organization which is taking a hard
line, opposing the creation of new layers of property rights by the treaty.
A large number of NGOs are here at the negotiations; but almost no other
civil society representatives from the developing world. The broadcasters
are of course very well represented, as is to be expected. During Day 2 of
the negotiations yesterday, a rather bizarre incident occurred, which forced
the SCCR Assembly to spend some time dicussing the role of NGOs and civil
society in IP negotiations.
Three NGOs - the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), IP Justice and the
Union for the Public Domain (UPD) had handouts which they wanted placed at a
desk near the entrance to the assembly room traditionally reserved for
documents, and on which other organizations (primarily broadcasters) had
placed documents. Half-way through the morning session, some members of the
NGO group found that all of their handouts had disappeared altogether. It
was later found that large stacks of the documents (in 50s and 100s) had
been thrown into the trash can in the men's room and in a couple of other
trash cans. This was brought to the attention of the WIPO secretariat and
the Chairman of the Assembly, who had coincidentally just made an
announcement that NGOs were unlikely to get a chance to speak until much
later in the session.
When the afternoon session commenced, the delegation of Brazil, which had
just heard about the incident, raised its flag asking for the floor. On
taking the floor, Brazil said that it had heard of this incident, was
alarmed by these developments and when coupled with the fact that NGOs were
unlikely to get a chance to take the floor and make their interventions, was
unfair and deprived national delegates of the chance to hear from different
parts of civil society. Almost immediately, the Indian delegation too raised
its flag and echoed Brazil's sentiments on the need for NGO intervention in
order to hear from experts and different interest groups and that the
trashing of public interest NGO delegations was an attempt to thwart the
democratic process.
The secretariat then apologised for the incident and the floor then opened on
the issue of NGO intervention. Surprisingly several developing countries
from Africa seemed openly annoyed by the suggestion that NGOs had anything
to offer the assembly. Eventually the chair proposed a compromise - asking
member nations to accelerate their interventions so as to allow NGOs to take
the floor after member nations.
The NGOs eventually were given an opportunity to take the floor late last
evening and the whole of today morning, as a consequence. Different interest
groups voiced their concerns and objections and their support/opposition for
the treaty itself.
A full text of the proceedings is available at the website of the Union for
the Public Domain (UPD) at <http://www.public-domain.org>, as also my
intervention on behalf of the UPD. The Indian delegation this time was
represented by members from their Permanent Mission - Mr. Debabrata Saha and
Ms. Preeti Saran, the Director and Registrar of Copyrights - Mr. Madhukar
Sinha and the Undersecretary to the Ministry of HRD - Mr. L.R. Aggarwal. It
must be said that India was one among the few strong voices arguing for
greater caution in pushing for further intellectual property protection.
Together with Brazil, they formed an alliance that kept intervening with
strong statements on different parts of the treaty - most notably on
anti-circumvention, web-casting and the need for a signal-based treaty,
rather than a property-rights based approach.
The SCCR session ends later today and I will post the final decision arrived
at by the assembly, later. Please get in touch with me if you require any
further information on the treaty itself or the SCCR process at the WIPO.
- Shyam.
-------------------------------------------------------
--
::::::::::::::::::
http://auskadi.tk
+ 34 665757391
+ 34 944668670
::::::::::::::::::
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo {AT} bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime {AT} bbs.thing.net