coco fusco on Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:47:18 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> THE OLD LEFT IN THE NEW WORLD |
My curiousity about this extends beyond the specifics of the conflicts outlined in the article, which appears on the surface to be about a group in India that disagrees with the premises of the World Social Forum in Mumbai. It seems to me as an outside observer that much more is going on, and that this essay is a symptom of one of those classic "wars of position" between two generations. It seems that a younger generation of intellectuals/artists arguing against those they identify as the old left may embrace anti-globalization movements, but in many ways they espouse pro-globalization positions that suit their interests, and this aspect of their politics is rarely interrogated. This is definitely not the first time I have come across statements of this ilk from associates of Sarai. They seem united in their insistent conflation of critiques of the Eurocentrism with Hindu fantatcism, outdated nationalism, and schlerotic forms of Marxism. Similarly, ANY concern about race and racism in the anti-globalization and alt.net media communities is equated with ethnic fundamentalism. And any desire to protect some aspect of nationalism in developing countries is met with disdain, without a closer look at the issues and the histories involved in each case. It may very well be that there are serious problems with the politics of those who dissent regarding the WSF. I would not deny that Hindu Fundamentalism exists or that there are real problems with nationalisms in many countries, ranging from alliances with xenophobic tendencies in Europe, the US, and Australia, to the cumbersome and inefficient bureaucracies in many countries. That said, the alternative of having no national governmental system spells disaster for many countries around the world. Regardless of the no-border fantasies of the European anti-globalization movement and their friends in other countries, there are still many good reasons to want to protect nation states and to maintain a public sector in many countries, particularly in developing nations. Privatization is hardly a panacea - on the contrary for many Latin American countries, a region I am more familiar with. Multinational aggregates such as the EU don't solve everything. Many "new social movements" in Latin America don't draw a distinction between globalization and imperialism. The indians who ousted the president of Bolivia recently because he wanted to sell the country's natural gas to the US and the scores of protestors in Mexico just last week who refused to allow President Fox to privatize the petroleum industry are protecting the public ownership of natural resources, a fundamental aspect of Latin American nationalism, one that I must say makes a lot of sense. Furthermore, it seems that the position of those associated with Sarai needs a closer look in terms of how intergenerational struggles for power are implicit in their slinging of epithets. Blanketly labelling an older generation of leftists as uniformly retrograde and even as being "soft on fundamentalism" makes the younger crowd look very attractive to the European and American left - it's the equivalent to bashing multiculturalists in the US and Europe as politically correct, or as outdated cultural nationalists who aren't hip to new realities. Between the lines of these "critiques" are implicit efforts to articulate a kind of global chic that effectively re-casts the interests of the much maligned old left (the relationship between modernity, modernization, colonialism and the third world) as the "new" vision of the post-postcolonial who all the post-identitarian posing, is actually deeply invested in representing the new face of India for Europe and America (and of being well financed by Europe to do so). Bashing the old left thus can be read as a way of ensuring that there will be no competition for time and space in global cultural circuits. Coco Fusco --- Aditya Nigam <aditya@sarai.net> wrote: > Dear Administrator, > I am pasting an article along with this mail for > your consideration - for > circulation in your list. The article addresses a > controversy over the > forthcoming WSF 2004 to be held in Mumbai in > January. This piece is > basically a response to a sectarian, self-styled > Maoist group which has > issued a document critiquing the WSF process and > calling upon people to > join their alternative event. I hope the > participants of the counter > globalization movement will find it of some > interest. > sincerely > Aditya Nigam <...> __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net