Soenke Zehle on Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:24:44 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> OSS and the Natural Sciences |
Felix' analysis might be (mis)read as suggesting that OSS needs to spread beyond a single realm of origination, but a different way of looking at it would be to trace where OSS once already existed but, for whatever reason, (temporarily) disappeared, and reconnect (to) some of these multiple points of emergence since the OSS 'commons-based peer production model' appears to have multiple ancestors - too much emphasis on its apparent 'newness' might be misleading and obscure these alternative genealogies. Until fairly recently, for example, many (natural) scientists used to be OSS advocates/users[1]. Now, the aggressive spread of IPR is provoking more and more coordinated responses in the area of OSS and the reconstruction of (limited) scientific commons, often with explicit reference to OSS/free software models and an emphasis on the parallels between OSS and the traditional sharing ethos of the natural sciences [2, also 3]. I am saying this as a media-theoretical newbie, of course, who has only followed OSS stuff for a very short period and is probably talking about stuff you already know. But it's something that struck me immediately: contrary to the clichè of corporate science (so dear to many in the humanities), many natural scientists are powerful allies in the struggle against proprietarization. sz [1] Orcero, David Santo. "The Crisis of Free Scientific Software." Free Software/Open Source: Toward Maturity. Special Issue of CEPIS Upgrade 2.6 (Dec 2001). 57-9. <http://www.upgrade-cepis.org/issues/2001/6/up2-6Santo.pdf> [2] Reichman, J.H., and Paul F. Uhlir. "A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment." Law and Contemporary Problems 66.3 (Winter/Spring 2003). 315-463. <http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp/lcptoc66winterspring2003.htm> [3] <http://cnx.rice.edu/licensing-workshop.html> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net