Borcila, Rozalinda on Sun, 18 Aug 2002 01:46:02 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: <nettime> Documenta XI but not really |
it is very rare that i respond to any messages posted, being happy to read and follow discussions as they unfold. but there is something here in calin's message, or perhaps not even in his message but beyond it, something that i recognise and which troubles me greatly. i, too, am a romanian and an artist. i realise i am in a sad minority as a romanian and an artist when i stubbornly hold on to the idea that art has no relevance once it defines itself as an insular , or autonomous, practice -- but rather, by its very definition, it is a cultural practice, and therefore, in relation to other aspects of culture: from literature to politics to history. where exactly these boundaries are to "art", that we can find, trace and then remain within them -- and how to maintain them so well-behaved? but most of all, why? what is there to gain from the rigidity of souch discoursive formations? i am deeply suspicious of the principle of autonomy. someone once used the term "specificity" in a discussion -- i think, a more useful term for me to use here. there are types of art/ if one wants to talk about media, or methods, types of praxis, methodology, style, whatever, that have specific ways of approaching or dealing with content, process, form. perhaps, if our debates about these works are limited and never arrive also at these specificities, we miss something important, something fundamental to what -- for instance, performance art can do that fundamentally no other type of cultural production offers, because it is postulated on the notion of dissappearance (its presence is due to the fact that it will dissappear, or something of that sort). i wonder if this is what calin means? rozalinda > ---------- > From: Calin > Reply To: Calin > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:09 AM > To: nettime-l@bbs.thing.net > Subject: <nettime> Documenta XI but not really > > Maybe it is time to notice that tere is not very much space left for > debating art as an autonomous discipline, with its territory and its > rules. [....] # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net