www.nettime.org Nettime mailing list archives
| Ned Rossiter on Wed, 1 Aug 2001 18:55:32 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> Enculturating Net-Porn: Interview with Libidot |
'Enculturating Net-Porn: Interview with Libidot'
July, 2001
Katrien Jacobs/Libidot is a Belgian academic based at Emerson
College, Boston. Her recent academic research and publications have
been on internet pornography, censorship issues and Shu Lea Cheang.
She is currently wearing a different hat at the moment, and is
travelling in Japan, Australia, and then consolidating work in Europe
and the US. She works as Libidot to produce web based material that
includes an installation recently held in Perth, a webdiary,
interviews, imagery and writing on net/video porn artists and
performance. Libidot is her method of producing work during the act
of travelling, an ongoing moody-adventurous and raw act of writing
and gathering information that complements the unrelentless academic
quest for publications as well as the peeking sexual drive or libido.
libidot {AT} earthlink.net
http://www.libidot.org
http://pages.emerson.edu/Katrien_Jacobs
Ned Rossiter: First of all, can you tell us what this project is about?
Libidot: The working title for this project is Porn Around the World.
I am travelling around the world to investigate how different
cultures interact with Internet pornography in the arts, sex
industries, mainstream and independent media. I am in the process of
writing a book about Internet pornography and decided to do
ethnographic research into communities, individuals, spaces, sites
and how they are affected by the globalised culture of Internet porn.
I am interested in the tension between the overly promoted lure of
pornographic screens and consumers who embody/act out/reinterpret
information in their actual lives, work and political environments. A
lot of this interplay between commodified screen-fantasies and
actuality is complex and intensely explored by media artists and
underground performers. I try to meet with them and learn about the
'coming to life' of current porn fantasies.
I am also questioning and dissolving the roles of 'academic
researcher' and his/her object of study as a 'pornographer'. I have
declared myself to be an 'obscene doctor' in that I am interested in
my own mental-sexual energy as a driving force for my research. I am
perhaps driven by the same sort of energy that once compelled artists
Zoot and Genant of Artporn Amsterdam to go to bed with a live octopus
in Japan, a capricious and technology-dependent energy that has
encouraged several generations of web-writers, nomadic researchers
and artists to commit acts of exhibitionism. In my case
exhibitionism is interwoven with a diligent or driven study and
observation of others. I try to incorporate everyday scholarly
activity, visiting places, meeting with individuals, and conceiving
of ideas, as a kind of obscene consciousness that is not to be
segregated from the daily transactions constituting Internet porn and
art itself. The sphere of energy that drives us disparate scholars
to study others and describe them as 'objects of study', remaining
behind the scenes yet getting aroused by our interconnected queries,
that is what interests me.
NR: Porn-around-the-world: why, then, these particular countries
(Japan, Australia, Belgium, USA)? Is there anything special about
these places that puts them on your itinerary? Perhaps you could say
something about how these places relate to your recent academic
research on censorship issues around the Internet, and the work of
Internet porn-artists?
Libidot: I have lived and worked in most of the countries and
continents where I do my research - Belgium, Australia, USA. Then
there are the other cultures such as Japan and Slovenia where I have
started doing work more recently and received a very good response. I
find it to hard to find an adequate focus for my research and have
started to adapt my identity as a 'mobile researcher' to the object
of study. In 1997 I moved from Washington DC to Perth, Western
Australia, after a number of online correspondences and phone-calls
with a university there. It was very difficult for me to arrive and
work in Perth and I started to develop an online identity in order to
escape from daily boredom and stress. To some extent, online
searching and writing can be very enriching for the libido and I fell
in love with a person who gave me more sexual satisfaction than I had
ever received. I met up with him in Brussels and we lived together
for a while as two amorous self-absorbed geeks. After our break-up
in Boston two years later, I travelled to Ljubjana, Slovenia and came
up with the idea that the law of gravity in real travel can
positively complement romantic-nomadic-obsessive ideas and
correspondences. I had been struggling with an excessive desire for
sex and discovered that the desire balanced out as soon as I started
travelling. I like sensing new environments and use travel,
pragmatic searching, exhausting my body, and sharpening intuition as
a way to construct 'peepzones' appropriate for my research. Those
peepzones are crafted by diverse people in existing places and thus
complicate and complement the Internet sex drive. I work with people
who understand and share my mindset and want to talk to me about
their own relation to pornography. A lot of those people are 'porn
artists' - i.e. artists who either work with and/or subvert
commercial pornography, or artists who have a peculiar bond with
sexual or obsessive-libidinal energy that is not always directly
manifest in their work.
The censorship issues are different in every country but governments
are mostly simultaneously encouraging and restricting online porn. Of
course it is not really porn itself that is endangering citizens,
except for children in developing countries whose services are
massively traded through the Internet, but the libidinal energy that
has infested the Internet since its foundation. That energy that
still zips through big brother mainframe and is used and/or purchased
by hackers, geeks, webgirrls and academics to commit to excessive
(rather than sexually explicit) acts of communication. When I moved
to Perth, I discovered some reactionary pieces of legislation (i.e.
WA Censorship Act of 1996) that tried to argue that citizens ought to
be very careful with this new influx of 'obscene' energy through the
Internet. This attitude stems from the idea that pornographic online
correspondences or transactions, just like the glow of excessive
advertising, may have a strong affect on individuals and their
fantasies, turning the local or national unconscious of everyday
educated citizens into a transnational smut-engine.
Meanwhile similar types of neo-conservative legislation have arisen
from state and federal governments in the UK, USA, Australia, and
France. What gets officially scrutinised by the new pieces of
legislation is the up/down loading by individuals and ISP's of
sexually explicit materials depicting taboo areas of sexuality -
child pornography, bestiality, sadomasochism. Right now we are
entering a second phase of Internet censorship where the
communicative energy itself is more successfully attacked and
obliterated. For example, commercial portals such as Yahoo are in
the process of trying to destroy messageboards and chatrooms
constructed on their 'free' servers, where illegal pornographers may
indeed arrange their transactions. The problem is that many mundane,
often young web-users and activists are equally hit by this
destruction, especially since so many of them are now using the
commercial portals for non-commercial activities. In Massachusetts,
for instance, it has become illegal to distribute any depictions of
nude minors and children (including babies). Several months before
this law came out, a couple of online gay communities, more
particularly urination and buttock fetishists, were hit really hard
by this decision as their sites were aggressively removed by
commercial host portals. The sites included messageboards where the
new censorship legislation was actively being discussed.
You might think of this as an inevitable clash, but it would be the
equivalent to obsessive online academics and activists waking up to
the total destruction/removal of <nettime>. It is for the very same
reason that I decided to place my website <http://www.libidot.org>
outside the boundaries of my academic institution on a server that
agreed, after much negotiation, to support the pornographic premises
of my work. Even though Emerson College supports my research through
grants for travel and web design, the libidot.org component of this
research is something they could easily remove from their server
without my consultation. There is really nothing like spectacular
porn or taboo graphics on that site, but it is a component of larger
fringe knowledge bases (both academic and otherwise) that are not yet
fully acknowledged as valid porn research.
NR: You began your trip in Japan. What have you been up to there? Who
have you met, and what are your impressions of pornographic culture
in Japan? For instance, is there a clear distinction between
mainstream, commercial porn, and a sort of avant-garde underground?
How does the underground, assuming one exists, frame its concerns -
theoretically, aesthetically, culturally?
Libidot: I first became interested in Japan through Shu Lea Cheang's
work and her 'digital sci-fi porn' movie I.K.U. I was invited by
Chris Berry, Audrey Yue and Fran Martin, the editors of the
forthcoming book _Mobile Cultures: Queer Asia and New Media_ (Duke
University Press), to write an article about this movie in terms of
how it depicts Japanese sexual 'underground' communities. This was a
difficult thing to do since I had never lived or worked in Japan. But
then I decided I had to go check it out, so I started my quest for
Tokyo's sexual cultures a couple of weeks ago. I was aided by Shu
Lea Cheang and Aky Narita, a bondage performer and old friend of
Artporn Amsterdam, who introduced me to artist and porn producers.
Here again, I became very interested in the interplay between erotic
magazine (manga) and videos/game (anime) images, and how artists
would rework them. I noticed that women in particular had a very
interesting way of playing with and subverting cartoon culture. For
instance, Minori Kitahara who owns a sex shop for women in the
backroom of her apartment, designs very unusual dildo's as well as
feminist cartoons that are attractive to young women (and men I
suppose).
So this is one example of a unique peepzone for my research, as the
sexual communities which emerge around Minori's store are not
ghettoised nor are they as publicly visible and politically active as
they are in western cultures. They have a very subtle way of
checking out the myriad Japanese porn cultures 'with a twisted mind',
stealing bits and pieces of information and presenting it as a new
kind of attraction. So it is much more difficult to make a
distinction between commercial and underground porn. The same holds
for the movie I.K.U. that in my opinion contains many moments of
witty commentary on commercial live and animated porn. However, in
order to notice and appreciate such work as subversion, one has to
almost be a Japanese porn or anime aficionado. Furthermore, anime
movies have a unique way of blending action and sex scenes that makes
it hard to classify them as 'porn' or 'not porn'.
Then recently at Melbourne's International Film Festival, I saw
_Tokyo Bound_, a new documentary by Susan Lambert about a mistresses
working in Tokyo. Just as popular striptease shows in Tokyo present
mythic scenes with live girls being attacked by ghosts and monsters,
_Tokyo Bound_ showed a scene in which the mistresses were dressed up
like a lobster and a mosquito, voraciously wrestling each other. This
is a coming to life of anime scenes. They are hard to frame in terms
of political or queer identity, but it does remind me of some early
avant-garde art such as Apollinaire's play the _Breasts of Tiresias_.
And even in early 20th century France there must have been a
commercial cabaret or erotic culture that directly inspired the
Avant-Garde. It's just so dead right now in the streets of
Melbourne, Boston, Brussels, Amsterdam, New York, where porn art is
uncomfortably ghettoised within art institutions or feminist and
queer activist institutions. Younger generations especially seem to
have lost their interest in these institutions. I am looking at
Japan as an example of a lively sexual universe, a good place for
women's activism, knowing that a lot of the commercial porn relies on
a strict division of gender roles that really pisses off Japanese
women.
NR: Your next stop has been Australia. You began research on
Internet censorship issues when you were working here for a couple of
years in the late nineties. How, if at all, is your performance in
Perth articulating with that aspect of your academic research (and
perhaps before you respond to this, you can tell us something about
the Perth performance/installation)?
Libidot: I once used to live and work in Perth and felt very
alienated from the rest of society. But sometimes such difficult
periods in one's life lead to epiphanies. I felt so cut off from the
rest of the world that I started to work more confidently on Internet
pornography. Unlike some uncomfortable 'porn dialogues' with
feminist and lesbian scholars I experienced in the USA, a growing
institutional approval and geek existence led me into the direction
of porn. I also started feeling more free as a scholar to use
different mediums of expression for my ideas, as Australia has much
more tolerance for such audio-visual and performative research. This
gave me a lot of courage for my work, but I could not maintain my
intellectual relationship with Perth without getting totally
depressed. So I moved in 1999 and then recently returned to Perth
and Australia to do research for my book. I arrived in Perth and put
up an installation piece in the heritage listed Moore's Building. The
installation invited viewers to go online and watch porn, print out
images and turn them into flowers. The flowers look like paper trash
coming out of the printer and filling up the room. This was a way of
kicking off my search for pornographers in Australia, the piece
Libidot and _Bubblejet 2001 SXY Flowers_ presented commercial porn
and was very open to the audience's desire or interest to look at
screen porn, the porn flowers, or add some of their own concepts.
Now I am talking to several artists, performers, sex worker's
organizations and sex shop owners in Sydney and Melbourne. I have
interviewed several artists and curators who followed the Australian
cyberarts boom very closely and are now trying to find out where it
is going to go next: Linda Dement, Linda Wallace, Virginia Barrett,
Sarah Waterson, Ian Haig, and many others. In Melbourne I tried out
a few venues from within the sex industry, but I haven't found
anything that stimulates me. I went to an SM play-party and did
enjoy talking to an older 'master' who was very keen on introducing
me to stimulation through electro-magnetic waves. He showed me his
'violent wand,' a seventy-year old hospital kit that supposedly was
used on cancer patients, and is something he now uses in dungeons to
administer little shocks. What I liked about his wand was that it
produced beautiful little fluorescent bolts of light - pink, green
and violet - when held closely to the skin. I was also fortunate
enough to meet with J.D. Ryan of Downunder Toys, a vibrator/dildo
manufacturer who has come up with a new line of women-friendly
vibrators. Some of them are shaped after native animals such as the
koala or platypus, and they are much smaller than those designed by
men. Is this a revolution? Is this a joke? In my view, the
vibrators are like curious little artworks and possibly some of the
best conceived designs on the market, as J.D. Ryan strongly believes
in online consumerism as a creative feminist mode of production.
Since many artists are also working as teachers, I ended up talking a
lot about teaching digital arts to younger generations of students.
Several developments are complicating this issue; first of all is the
fact that younger people are no longer excited to learn through the
written word. Secondly, the collapse of liberal areas of study such
as feminism, gender studies, queer studies. Thirdly, the collapse of
dotcom economy. I personally believe that a study of pornography,
sexuality and technology could be introduced in a fascinating way,
but there seems to be a drift towards classical and safer fields of
study. I have been able to pull together some of the strands of my
research in a webdiary. I post a message and a picture about my work
in progress every day. This work mode then forces at least some
structure on the project and is also accessible to non-academics.
NR: What sort of reaction have you had from your university with this
project, particularly senior faculty and your immediate colleagues?
Have you had to frame the project in such a way that makes it fit
into target research areas - I'm thinking about funding issues here,
and how those projects that attract funds within university settings,
typically, are ones that articulate with the political economy of
research? How receptive is your university to funding and supporting
research projects of a creative nature that do not fit the usual
categories of academic publishing?
Libidot: Emerson College has been very supportive of my work, even
though it involves a lot of sexually explicit materials, often
produced by myself, and non-typical modes of academic production.
They did know about this aspect of my work when they hired me and
have not stopped me from thinking through the experimental nature of
the work. I have also started to deliver academic papers in
performative fashion with the help of my colleague, digital sound
designer Maurice Methot. We select a piece of writing, which is then
randomly sampled and mixed in with images and sounds. Maurice and I
did a presentation at Emerson College called 'pornography and
indeterminacy'. It was like an awkward jam-the-mind session and was
received with bewilderment. Several senior faculty members and
administrators were in the audience and they did not discard it
completely. After giving such a presentation, the audience who until
then had been observing conventional conference presentations (mostly
read aloud from a piece of paper) became confused over what
constitutes an effective mode of delivery. Of course I still have to
produce and deliver all the standard publications as well in order to
create a space to be an obscene or whatever scholar. It is a
parallel existence, where the experimental work is more risky, more
challenging and takes up more of the time. I now know that I cannot
proceed academically without this kind of experimental-performative
work any more. My own mental sanity is at stake!
NR: How do you see this project developing?
I will be developing the libidot website. First of all (an idea
borrowed from Geert Lovink) I want to use the site to write and
publish several chapters of my forthcoming 'Peepzones' book, not only
to maintain a mechanism that will hopefully inspire me to write
regularly but also to develop a number of unconventional writing
styles and topics. The book is in progress, and I am trying to find
a less academic writing style that is open to young generations.
Secondly, I hope to start up a sexuality and technology forum, where
writers and artists from different cultures can post their work and
enter discussion. At this moment it has been possible for people to
read the webdiary, post messages and submit work, but I have to think
about an adequate and low maintenance design for benign, obscene
doctors to look at other people's work. I am sure that Brian the
Brain will be looking over my shoulder.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo {AT} bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime {AT} bbs.thing.net