Lachlan Brown on Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:48:02 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] The Commons? Greenham Common! |
Completed my social science methodological exercise into the question tragedy of the commons?. The exercise was undertaken from Sept 1st 2001 to Easter 2002 to 'sharpen up' my social science methodological skills after researching the emergence of Internet in culture, 1993-. The study was of a closed system in which numerous needy individuals competed under high stress in an open air environment over resources that fluctuated over time. These resources were tied to variations in international migration patterns, as well as seasonal variations in the weather, and the environment was modified by the landlord in various ways, and also the State intervened on one occasion, . This was a winter long study, excpet for 5 weeks detention in an Immigration holding centre, carried out near Toronto. I found that no tragedy of the commons occured. While this was a social exercise subject to ecological variations as well as variations brought about by changes in human patterns of migration, and not a study of ecology alone; my findings have relevance for the impact of such a stable system in human geography and society, despite heightened competition among individuals, patterns of collaboration occured contingently with little conflict. When there was overgrazing or resources were few, the environment was more crowded with competition but people accepted less and managed their schedules and demands in their own interest and in the interests of others. This study of stability and sustainability under extreme conditions in society has relevance regarding impacts upon another closed system like the eco-system. It should not be too difficult to model this system of human behavior in a sympathetic relationship with our biosphere. The study was also a self funding social science research exercise. Not that I recommend this way of funding across the board. I found, additionally, that I had ample time to intervene online in the failure of the critical community to speak up against formidable emergency legislation in the interests of public safety in the West, post 911; and then to intervene in one possible way this legislation may be employed, opportunely and politically through 'witchtrial' methods to further erode our rights, responsibilities and social democracies. I think I was successful in both interventions. Though sometimes I was quite tired, physically and intellectually the exercises were compatible and enjoyable. If you would like to know more, please get in touch with me care of editors@london.com The study could be repeated and hence the conclusions can be tested by a hardy social scientist or human geographer next winter. I wouldn't recommend the experience however. Re: confusion over the meaning of 'The Commons' in Mute Magazine, Chicago and elsewhere: The clearest expression of the meaning of the word 'Common' in England that I know of, that may help to focus people's attention on the question in hand, politically and culturally speaking, is Greenham Common. Happy Easter. Lachlan Brown -- _______________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Win the Ultimate Hawaiian Experience from Travelocity. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4018363;6991039;n?http://svc.travelocity.com/promos/winhawaii/ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold