Steve Schear on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:01:14 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> PATENTING OPEN SOURCE |
At 02:41 PM 6/22/2001 +0100, you wrote: >--- begin forwarded text > > >Status: U >Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:55:40 +0200 >To: nettime-l@bbs.thing.net >From: Andreas Broeckmann <abroeck@transmediale.de> >Subject: <nettime> PATENTING OPEN SOURCE >Sender: nettime-l-request@bbs.thing.net >Reply-To: Andreas Broeckmann <abroeck@transmediale.de> > >Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:08:48 +0200 (CEST) >From: desk@doorsofperception.com > > >PATENTING OPEN SOURCE >Patent protection for open source software may seem like a contradiction in >terms, but the Foresight Institute, which campaigns for the free exchange >of knowledge in software and nanotechnology, has teamed up with IP.com, a >Silicon Valley start-up, to work on the PriorArt initiative for programmers >and scientists. Under the initiative, software developers and >nanotechnologists are encouraged to undertake 'defensive publishing' - >which means releasing their innovations into the public domain so others >cannot later patent what they have invented. Such public disclosure of >innovation is known in law as 'prior art'. >http://www.priorart.org/press1.jsp This was discussed at their fall meeting. Following this path might also deter those who would seek to keep these technologies out of the hands of independent developers or average citizens. steve _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold