integer on 7 Mar 2001 12:51:49 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] (no subject) |
>dear kuni > >>...because net.art, I mean: real net.art and esp. >>true net.art (that is: the context you named above) >>definitely was (and is) more or less >"men only"? "women only" >i.e. > >0100101110101101.org is 50% female >irational.org is 50% female. >nn is hypothetically 100% female. nn = 100 prozent leavez + petalz >>brilliant! > >or is it ignorant? net.art +? >best regards free regards >Anja > > >********************************************* >Want free email? no. http://www.frieze.com/features/features.asp?f=559 kuni <kuni@mail.uni-mainz.de> >[to be frank: du = kan b frank an! t!me u l!ke kun! >personally, I believe >that not only any true piece of net.art, >but also all true net.artists are 100% female >-- even those who do not know about that so far >and are spending their public, sometimes >even their private life as male >impersonators to make sure they succeed in >the art world... some even get >married and/or pretend to have children >with their female partners ;-))] http://meta.am/pop/ztar 100 prozent grl.vr!!endl! _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold