marion v. osten on Fri, 12 Nov 1999 15:50:26 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Syndicate: New MN |
Dear MN's friends and all others, This text is a summary about MN1/Zurich 98. A new concept for the continuation in 2000 will follow in December 1999. Yours Marion ---------------------------------------- MoneyNations www.moneynations.ch Exhibition, Webzine, Video and Magazine Project, Workshop and Congress with: A-Clip (Berlin), Absolutno (Novi Sad), Mehmet Akiol (Zurich), Edit Andras (Budapest), Joerg Arendt (Bonn), Marion Baruch/Name Diffusion (Paris/Milan), Paula di Bello/ Marco Biraghi (Milan), Jochen Becker (Berlin), Marica Bender /RadioZid (Sarajevo), Luchezar Boyadjiev (Sofia), Iara Boubnova (Sofia), Fritz Burschel / 'No one is illegal', Iana Cvikova /ASPEKT (Bratislava), Eva Danzl Suarez / FIZ (Zurich), Dogfilm (Berlin), Melita Gabric / Blaz Habjan / Martine Anderfuhren (Ljubljana/Geneva), Hex TV (Cologne), Berta Jottar (New York), K3000 (Zurich), Gülsün Karamustafa (Istanbul), Beat Leuthard (Basel), Level ltd. (Zurich), Geert Lovink (Amsterdam), Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslavien (Zurich), Marton Oblath (Budapest), Ayse �ncü (Istanbul), Marion von Osten (Berlin/Zurich), Drazen Pantic / B92 (Belgrade), Marco Peljhan / Ljudmilla (Ljubljana), Lia & Dan Perjovschi (Bucharest), Pascal Petignat / Peter Riedlinger (Zurich/Vienna), Sascha Roesler (Zurich), Polnischer Sozialrat (Berlin), Kalin Serapionov (Sofia), Oliver Sertic / Attak (Zagreb), Natalie Seitz / Markus Jans (Lucerne), Nedko Solakov (Sofia), Peter Spillmann (Zurich), Deep Europe / V2_East-Syndicate, Mina Vuletic / B92 (Belgrade), Dr. Anna Wessely (Budapest), Jeta Xharra /Mediaproject (Pristina), Zelimir Zilnik / Terra Film (Novi Sad). The MoneyNations project took place for the first time in the Shedhalle in Zurich from 23 October - 13 December 1998. The starting-point of MoneyNations was to address the complex and contradictory process of forming collective and individual identities in (radically) changing political conditions. Central to this analysis was the fact that Western Europe's border policies in relation to Central and South-Eastern Europe is tightening culturally and economically, and the racial discrimination against non-Europeans associated with this. The project concentrated on kindling an active debate between, and bringing together, creative artists and media activists from Eastern and Western Europe and looked at the way in which they are represented in the context of art, as a social and symbolic location. We worked for over a year on setting up a network of correspondents - the "KorrespondentInnennetz - in which theorists, media activists and artists from Central and South-Eastern Europe worked from different points of view against the production of borders by a Europe that is centred above all on the West. The work that emerged from this process of exchange includes video productions, photographic works, installations, theoretical texts and narratives. The artists' and video producers' pieces were introduced in the Shedhalle exhibition and are being shown in various places in Eastern and Western Europe and further exploited as a basis for work and discussion. The Shedhalle project was launched with a three-day congress on the "Economy of the Border" and a workshop with media producers from the former Jugoslavia. The project will continue next year probably in Bratislava and in Vienna. All the contributions are published in English on the www.moneynations.ch web site or in the publication "The Correspondent". Money / Nation Immanuel Wallerstein and Etienne Balibar introduced the concept of 'ambivalent identities' into discussion about racism in the early 90s. They tried to identify elements driven by the global economy in their analysis of discrimination and inequality, and the role these played in maintaining class- and race-specific differences. According to Balibar/Wallenstein, every modern "nation" is a product of colonization/capitalization: it was always a colonizing or colonized power to a certain extent, and to an extent even both at the same time. But the nation-form, and thus the quality that we call national identity, cannot simply be derived from capitalist production methods, as it was for a long time customary to think in classical left-wing analysis, but we can see today that the space that is needed for the circulation of money in particular has a tendency to go beyond national borders. But capital and its protagonists are not independent of spatial requirements; each needs very specific local conditions in order to cream off profit and to be productive. It seems that for the circulation of money today the nationally regulated economies, in the form in which we became familiar with them in Western Europe and the USA after 1945, are no longer appropriate for expansive movements in advanced capitalism in the late twentieth century. Free trade areas, the dismantling of customs agreements (WTO) and the associated hyper-exploitation above all in the south and east, and then the "Global Cities" and their information technologies, together with more flexible working practices, define the spatial conditions of a new, neo-liberal world order. Balibar/Wallerstein say that the world-wide social and economic processes that are now defined as "globalization" correspond with the historical form of a world economy that was always organized and divided into hierarchies in such a way that there is a "center" and a "periphery", where one then finds different forms of accumulation and exploitation. The new approaches of post-colonialism went a stage further as they no longer saw the relationship between the First and Third Worlds as a binary opposition structure. They resisted attempts at holistic social explanations, recognizing that the borderlines between opposing political spheres are much more complex and contradictory than we had assumed. Thus post-colonial criticism takes up the fight with the totalizing concepts of Modernism, here fitting with Gender and Cultural studies in general. Despite its essentially culturalist approach, the post-colonial view does not deny the difference that lies behind the symbolic, political and economic domination of psychological and social identification. In brief, post-colonialism means using different ways of understanding the concepts we use to help us to formulate community, nationality or ethics. On this head as well the post-colonial view chimes with feminist theory and practice. Theorists like Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak work from this point of view and have brought new and fundamental insights into Western feminism. Central to the debate are the different realities of women in the diaspora. The concept of cultural and ethnic units that are prescribed almost naturally (culture clash) was abandoned in favour of a concept of hybridity that places the different social, political and cultural conditions for developing an identity centre-stage. Culture is a starting-point for considering current global changes from a post-colonial point of view, because it clearly shows up the contradictions, conflicts, but also new terrains for action that have already emerged. EUroland Criticism of a eurocentrically organized apparatus for power and knowledge has been increasingly heard since the early 90s, on the German-language art and culture scene as well. But for MoneyNations the central question was whether we can assume a common basis for interpreting the concept of hegemony among the producers of culture in the post-Communist states and those from the "West". Can the countries of Eastern Europe already, still or again be counted as part of the Western centre, or does the Shengen Agreement illustrate precisely the boundaries that have manifested themselves culturally, socially and economically since 1989? Power relationships cannot be explained conclusively in terms of the binary structure of the West as a center and the East as a periphery. It seems that in fact new centers have formed in Central and Eastern Europe and also that racism and sexism are not 'Western' phenomena, but occur all over the world. But in contrast with the North-South argument, the East-West relationship is much more contradictory because of historical and political differences, and also attracts much less attention. The political systems that used to confront each other, whose Cold War propaganda machines quite uninhibitedly permitted representing "the others" as huge and horrific enemies, are now again described as national units, and defined via their particular status in terms of Westernization and advancing capitalism. Media reports still choose the "wild East" as their favourite topic, along with Mafia-type structures, empty state coffers and other states of emergency. United Europe's legislation governing borders and foreigners excludes the "East" as a matter of policy, and multinational concerns and investors discovered Central and South-Eastern Europe as the countries with the cheapest possible labour well before 1990. This is why an attempt is being made on the cultural plane to hark back to the historical continuity of an Eastern and a Western European identity. But typological stereotypes, exoticism and assertions of cultural difference do not occur only in the media, but also in exhibitions of Eastern European art, which face out border production by "Fortress Europe" and Eastern Europe's roll as a global lowest-wage location by constructing authenticity (Sammlung Ludwig) or by asserting a new internationalism (Manifesta). MoneyNations attempted to address these contradictions. Traditionally, European identity was always formed by drawing a line of demarcation with the "major others", Africa, the USA, Japan, Asia and the Orient. This identity relied above all on the special qualities of a cultural tradition, so that the "others' " traditions could be devalued at the same time. Thus extending the eastern boundaries of the EU or joining NATO, which are both being dangled before the countries of Eastern Europe, once more builds on the exclusive quality of "old" Europe and the western center, while the reality of the former socialist alliance and also the countries in the south of the globe are left out of account. Thus culture acquires central significance in the exclusion processes. And yet we should not lose sight of the fact that current European grouping, and European monetary union, are directly linked with global economic competition. But the attempt to fuse the European nation-states into "one Europe" creates new models (for a new pan-European identity) and thus correspondingly excludes anyone who does not fit in with this model of an economically efficient Europe. But this construction involving the "others" is not stable, but constantly subject to different social negotiations. Thus in the case of Eastern Europe the categories have changed constantly since 1989, and differently from country to country. Access The MoneyNations project started with the question of how we can develop cultural practices that intervene actively in these current processes. For this reason the project did not take the angle that harsher immigration policies (in Switzerland as well) derive only from capitalist production methods, but inquired about the significance of racist and sexist categorization and practice for productive forces under late capitalism and what contradictions, instabilities and resistances can already be derived from this. For a year, working from the Shedhalle and supported in part by existing networks (like for example V2/East_Syndicate) and friends who were also producers, we built up a network of correspondents - the "KorrespondentInnennetz". At first, theorists, media activists and artist from Central and Southern Europe started to exchange e-mails, speaking against borders produced by a Europe that was above all centred on the West. The analyses and concepts of the various people involved in the project also made it clear that it was possible to establish forms of communication and resistance, and also new production connections, that rose above individual states, beyond the usual stigmatization as "Bulgarian", "German", "Romanian", "Turkish" etc. Thus the line taken by the project fits in with the general tendency that deregulation of nation-state units, as an effect of liberalized world trade, is also shifting and destabilizing the boundaries of national allegiance and also those of the traditional gender regime. For example, we observed that South-Eastern Europe is leading the world for the European textile industry as a low-wage location because of its geographical proximity: a branch of commerce in which young women in particular work, without security and partly in their own homes; but these women have also become breadwinners for their families, thus making the old privileges of a largely male workforce questionable. Thus theorist Saskia repeatedly points out in her critical analyses that new developments certain to undermine the old notions of statehood and their sexist and racist policies can and will occur in the process of globalization. But a discussion of this kind about civil society or "globalization from below" also involves, for the specifically Eastern European situation, coming to terms with the function that is attached to Western investors and financial capital (Georg Soros) as far as culture promotion and social movements are concerned. And going beyond this, the real practice of harsher immigration requirements and non-recognition of a legal status for migrants within EUrope has to be set against the positive assumptions of global democratization processes. The so-called three-circle-model discriminates against Eastern Europeans in particular, who are forced into informal sectors, as commuting workers or into other conditions of inequality that are usually segregated gender-specifically (as sex workers, cleaners or service personnel). Another important research topic for MoneyNations was the field of consumption: as cultural symbols, ideas and objects are acquired and "domesticized", new local communities also form, and these lead to a new range of available roles, but also to role constraint. For this reason it became a central field of the project to reassess economies that are described as "informal" as opposed to the formal economics of the Western commercial systems. In this context, as part of the �Border Economy" congress, the specific social and economic situation of the post-communist states was made the central consideration. Since 1989, markets have emerged in all the countries of Southern, Central and Central-Eastern Europe in which a new form of retail trade takes place, which are inestimably important for the economies of Eastern Europe and marginalize the West as a center. For example, artist Gülsün Karamustafa of Istanbul reported that since 1989 her city had become the central market-place for the countries of South-Eastern Europe. On the other hand, in Sofia (BUL) a market for bootleg CDs has built up that - although forbidden - still makes up a large part of the functioning economy. These forms of trade subvert Western notions of value in many respects: they question both the protection of trade marks and (border) agreements between nation states. At the same time they represent a real basis for life within the transformation processes in the post-communist countries. These contradictory developments were discussed by the participants, and so was the question of how we can talk about borders and drawing borders without delegating the problems of Germany or Switzerland to Eastern Europeans, or without defining the Western borders as essential. We therefore agreed to follow the "border" from the point of view of subversion, of resistance. The "Suitcase Economy" also became synonymous with our own exchange situations within the project. Marion von Osten Marion von Osten Eisenacherstr.64 D-10823 Berlin fon 0049 30 788 4661 marionvonosten@gmx.ch o. c/o k3000 Schöneggstr. 5 8004 Zürich fon 0041 1 291 3040 ------Syndicate mailinglist-------------------- Syndicate network for media culture and media art information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at> in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress