Declan McCullagh on Wed, 29 Dec 1999 21:14:15 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> FC: Russian government wants to restrict sites in .RU domain |
[orig to <politech@vorlon.mit.edu>] ********** >Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 18:19:31 -0500 >To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> >From: Barry Steinhardt <Barrys@aclu.org> >Subject: Governmental control over .RU zone > > >Declan, > >Here is a disturbing report from Russia that was posted to the Global >Internet Liberty Campaign (www.GILC.org) list. Sergei Smirnov of the >Russian Human Rights Network reports that the Russian government plans to >control the .RU domain with the prospect that web sites might be licensed. > >Russia, of course, is also the home of SORM the edict which forces ISPs to >route all email traffic to the state security service the FSB. (The FSB is >the domestic successor to the KGB). SORM is currently being challenged by a >St Petersburg ISP and the human rights group Citizens Watch as a violation >of European Human Rights Law. The issue. is likely to end up in the >European Court of Justice, where it could set an important precedent for >all of the European nations who belong to the Council of Europe.. > >Barry Steinhardt > > >On 28 December 1998 Russian premier minister Vladimir Putin and members of >the goverment met Russian Internet community representatives. During that >meeting the minister of communication and information Leonid Reitman >announced his plans on governmental control over registration of new domain >names in Russian .ru zone. A new structure will be created for this purpose >only, said the minister. In draft document obtained from the government it >is described as new sites must be created and registered. > >Separately from all other events this information means almost nothing since >there are no strict limitations in papers presented by the government. >However the growing interest of Russian government towards Internet became >bad tradition after Reitman declared earlier that Internet should be >controlled by the government for "bad sites" to be closed and next attempt >of Russian powers to review the Internet "official status" as mass media >with mandatory registration and licensing of websites. > >The governmental discomfort has been amplified after two major events. The >first one was the Chechen site which offered "alternative" information about >the current war campaign (often polar to one produced by governmental >media). The second one was scandal around the results of parliamenrtary >elections published on the Web (it is prohibited by Russian laws to publish >such materials in mass media while elections are going on; however, Internet >is not mentioned in home legislation as "mass media"). > >Sergei Smirnov >Human Rights Network >http://www.hro.org > > > >________________________________________________________ >Barry Steinhardt 212 549 2508 (v) >Associate Director 212 549 2656 (f) >American Civil Liberties Union Barrys@aclu.org >125 Broad Street >New York, NY 10004 http://www.aclu.org > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology To subscribe: send a message to majordomo@vorlon.mit.edu with this text: subscribe politech More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net