<nettime> Seattle: Disarming the New World Order

[Michel Chossudovsky <chossudovsky@videotron.ca> (by way of mediafilter)]

SEATTLE AND BEYOND: DISARMING THE NEW WORLD ORDER
by

Michel Chossudovsky

Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and author of The
Globalization of Poverty, Impacts of IMF and World Bank Reforms, Third World
Network, Penang and Zed Books, London, 1997.


In preparing the Seattle Millennium meetings, Washington in consultation with
Brussels and the WTO in Geneva, is set on weakening and dividing social
movements and citizens' groups which have converged on Seattle from all over
the World. Meanwhile, local organisers are busy --together with the FBI and the
Seattle Police Department (SPD)-- in carefully planning "security arrangements"
for the official venue. An extensive police apparatus has been set motion.
Special Forces from the FBI, the CIA and other federal agencies will be on the
scene. "Trouble-makers" are to be held at bay, well equipped riot police are on
hand including Gang Squads and SWAT teams of the Tactical Operations Divisions
which constitute the "more militarized components" of the police force.1
Everything has been put in place to keep the Citizens' Summit physically
removed from the Ministerial Conference. As in previous counter-summits (Rio de
Janeiro, Madrid, Copenhagen, Beijing, etc.), the intent is to ensure that the
numerous protest meetings, teach-ins and mass rallies do not obstruct or in any
way threaten the legitimacy of the official venue. In Seattle, the holding of
parallel sessions by NGOs requires formal "accreditation" with the Seattle Host
Committee chaired by Microsoft's Bill Gates and Philip Condit of The Boeing
Company.

Several months ahead of time, the WTO and Western governments had called for a
"dialogue" with selected civil society organisations in setting the agenda for
the Millennium Round. "Partner NGOs", namely those "we can trust" were provided
with funds to travel and organize their respective "teach-ins" in Seattle.
Already last year, the WTO had announced a plan for "an on-going collaboration
with partner NGOs" while emphasising that the WTO "recognizes the role NGOs can
play to increase the awareness of the public in respect of WTO activities".2
Similarly, the European Commission had underscored its "commitment to
transparency and openness in trade policy-making".3

Carefully screened "partner NGOs" were invited to participate in a number of
preparatory "issue-specific" events. The European Commission held several
rounds of consultations with selected consumer, labour, environmental and
development organisations with a view to "to improve the transparency of WTO
meetings" including public access to WTO documents and the creation of an WTO
"information ombudsman".4 In the words of (former) European Trade Commissioner
Sir Leon Brittan:
"A Millennium round of trade talks should not just benefit business. We can and
should ensure that Consumers and the environment also gain. The Commission has
today opened a dialogue with a wide cross-section of NGOs as it believes
transparency and openness are essential if a new round is to reap its full
benefits. NGOs are crucial partners in preparing for the negotiations that lie
ahead." 5
THE COUNTER SUMMIT

Controlled and financed by official donors and research foundations, the hidden
agenda is to install a "politically correct" Citizens' Summit, namely to ensure
that the various teach-ins and public rallies in the streets of Seattle conform
to the dominant "counter discourse". The latter consists in pressing for the
inclusion of token environmental, labour and human rights clauses, "poverty
alleviation" schemes as well as "institutional reforms" without defying the
central role of trade liberalisation.

The partner non-governmental organisations have, in this regard, already
committed themselves not to question "the legality" or legitimacy of the WTO as
an institution. Accredited NGO participants have been invited to mingle in a
friendly environment with ambassadors, trade ministers and Wall Street tycoons
at several of the official events including the numerous cocktail parties and
receptions. In turn, an (official) "WTO Sponsored NGO Symposium" is to be held
for chosen NGO participants one day before the launching of the Ministerial
Conference, with carefully worded opening statements by WTO Director General
Mike Moore and US Trade Secretary Charlene Barshevsky.

In other words, the ploy in Seattle (supported by a lavish public relations
campaign) is to carefully diffuse an international mass movement directed
against the WTO and the powerful business syndicates which lie discretely in
the background. "Criticism yes, that's democratic", but the "free market"
system must prevail, the legitimacy of the institutions --including their
Geneva and Washington based bureaucracies-- must not be challenged... In
return, the official conference will accept to embody on behalf of the
"accredited" labour and civil society organisations, various token
environmental and other concessions in their main resolutions with a view to
providing a much needed "human face" to the WTO.

The Millennium Round meetings also purport to replicate the habitual parallel
"People's Summit" which now constitutes an integral component of successive
World venues. Repeated almost annually since the 1992 Rio Environment
Conference, the People's Summit while providing a forum for critical debate,
has over the years largely become "a ritual of dissent" which largely leaves
the official Summit unscathed.

The parallel P7 ("People's P7 Summit") at the G7 meetings in Cologne in June
1999, for instance, was put together in consultation with the host organisers
of the official Summit, generously funded by the Heinrich Boell Foundation
which is an arm of the German Green Party controlled by Foreign Minister
Joschka Fisher. The structure of the Cologne P7 was geared towards deflecting
debate on controversial issues including the "humanitarian bombings" of
Yugoslavia... Meanwhile, more than 20,000 people from all parts of Europe had
gathered in the streets of Cologne under the umbrella of the Jubilee Campaign.
Their petition to unconditionally erase Third World debt had been signed by
more than 17 million people. World leaders respectfully paid tribute to the
Jubilee initiative, responding with empty rhetorical commitments on debt
reduction for the World's poorest countries. The substantive proposal of the
Campaign had been casually dismissed.

In Seattle, many of the accredited NGOs representing specific interests (eg.
environmental, labour, human rights, women's organisations, etc) will be
putting forth separate demands. There is evidence that several of the key NGOs
have been infiltrated by Western intelligence agencies. The Counter-Summit is
to be fragmented into a "mosaic" of secluded events focussing on separate and
distinct policy issues. The hidden agenda is to enable each of these separate
venues "to do their own thing" in a semblance of "people's participation": the
goal of the Seattle organisers is to mask the truth, prevent the development of
a mass movement, suppress real democracy and uphold the authority of the
institutions of the New World Order.

In turn, the AFL-CIO joined by trade union bosses from around the World, has
called upon the WTO to "enforce minimum labour standards... in the global
market". Caving in to Washington's demands, Labour's buzz-word is to "make the
global economy work for working families".6 A carefully drafted petition urges
the Ministerial Conference to adopt "trade and investment rules [which] protect
workers' rights and the environment".7 The overall legitimacy of the WTO and of
US trade policy is not in question. In turn, the AFL-CIO has been put in charge
of the organisation of a mass rally which usefully serves the purpose of
deflecting the international protest movement on the streets of Seattle...

In Seattle, the big divide will be between those who are genuinely opposed to
the New World Order and those "partner" civil society organisations which have
all the appearances of being "progressive" but which in fact are creatures of
the system. Often funded by their respective governments, they form part of a
politically correct "Opposition" which acts as "a spokesperson for civil
society". But who do they represent? Many of the "partner NGOs" and lobby
groups which frequently mingle with bureaucrats and politicians, have few
contacts with grass-roots social movements and people's organisations. In the
meantime, they serve to deflect the articulation of "real" social movements
against the New World Order.

This does not mean that "dialogue" with the WTO and the governments should be
ruled out as a means of negotiation. On the contrary, "lobbying" must be
applied vigorously in close liaison with constituent social movements. The
underlying results and information of these negotiations, however, must be
channelled with a view to reinforcing rather than weakening grass roots
actions. In other words, we should not allow "lobbying" to be conducted in an
isolated and secretive fashion by organisations which are "hand picked" by the
governments and the WTO.

A MORATORIUM ON LIBERALISATION NEGOTIATIONS

More than 1200 groups and organisations from more than 85 countries have called
for a "Moratorium" on further liberalisation under WTO auspices including the
holding of an "Audit" to be undertaken on the impacts of globalisation. Their
consensus statement ("Statement From Members of International Civil Society
Opposing A Millennium Round"):
"oppose[s] any further liberalisation negotiations, especially those which will
bring new areas under the WTO regime, such as investment, competition policy
and government procurement. We commit ourselves to campaign to reject any such
proposals. We also oppose the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. We call for a moratorium on any new issues or further
negotiations that expand the scope and power of the WTO. During this moratorium
there should be a comprehensive and in-depth review and assessment of the
existing agreements. Effective steps should then be taken to change the
agreements. Such a review should address the WTO's impact on marginalised
communities, development, democracy, environment, health, human rights, labour
rights and the rights of women and children. The review must be conducted with
civil society's full participation.
The Statement constitutes an important step in challenging the official Agenda.
It is based on a carefully worded consensus of a large number of individual
organisations.

ILLEGALITY OF THE WTO

Yet this important Statement in demanding a "Moratorium" on further
liberalisation negotiations, fails to question the legitimacy of the WTO as an
institution. And indeed this issue should have been included explicitly in the
Statement.

The Marrakesh Agreement of 1994 constitutes a blatant violation of fundamental
social, economic and cultural rights. The stakes in Seattle are fundamental and
cannot be addressed with a compromise Statement which tacitly accepts the
legitimacy of the WTO as an institution. The WTO was put in place following the
signing of a "technical agreement" negotiated behind closed doors by
bureaucrats. Even the heads of country level delegations to Marrakesh in 1994
were not informed regarding the statutes of the World Trade Organisation which
were drafted in separate closed sessions by technocrats.

"The Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade
Negotiations", was signed by ministers in Marrakesh on 15 April 1994. The Final
Act is a "technical agreement" which instates the WTO as a World body. "The WTO
framework ensures a "single undertaking approach" to the results of the Uruguay
Round - thus, membership in the WTO entails accepting all the results of the
Round without exception."

Following the Marrakesh meeting, the 550 page Agreement (plus its numerous
appendices) was either rubber-stamped in a hurry or never formally ratified by
national parliaments. The articles of agreement of the WTO resulting from this
"technical agreement" were casually entrenched in international law. In other
words, the 1994 Marrakesh Agreement which instates the WTO as a multilateral
body, bypasses the democratic process in each of the member countries. It
blatantly derogates national laws and constitutions while providing extensive
powers to global banks and multinational corporations. These powers have in
fact become entrenched in the articles of agreement of the WTO.

In other words, the process of actual creation of the WTO following the Final
Act of Uruguay Round is blatantly "illegal". Namely a "totalitarian"
intergovernmental body has been casually installed in Geneva, empowered under
international law with the mandate to "police" country level economic and
social policies, derogating the sovereign rights of national governments.
Similarly, the WTO almost neutralises "with the stroke of the pen" the
authority and activities of several agencies of the United Nations including
the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and the
International Labour Organisation (ILO).

Moreover, the articles of WTO are no only in contradiction with pre-existing
national and international laws, they are also in at variance with "The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights". Acceptance of the WTO as a legitimate
organisation is tantamount to an "indefinite moratorium" or repeal of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Moreover, apart from the blatant violation of international law, WTO rules
provide legitimacy to trade practices which border on criminality, including
"intellectual piracy" by MNCs, the derogation of plant breeders rights, not to
mention genetic manipulation by the biotechnology giants, the patenting of life
forms including plants, animals, micro-organisms, genetic material and human
life forms under the TRIPs agreement.

In the sphere of financial services, the provisions of the GATS provide
legitimacy to large scale financial and speculative manipulations directed
against developing countries which are often conducive to the demise of
country-level monetary policy.

And the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures upholds the legitimacy of these
various manipulative procedures...

THE BALANCE SHEET OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DESTRUCTION

Amply documented, humanity is undergoing in the post-Cold War era an economic
and social crisis of unprecedented scale leading to the rapid impoverishment of
large sectors of the World population. National economies are collapsing,
unemployment is rampant; Wall Street banks are "taking over countries" one
after the other;  regional wars have erupted along strategic gas-oil pipelines
and often behind the various "insurgencies" are powerful corporate interests
which coincidentally are also lobbying for trade reform... In most countries
the standard of living has collapsed...

This Worldwide crisis of the late twentieth century is more devastating than
the Great Depression of the 1930s. It has far-reaching geo-political
implications; economic dislocation has also been accompanied by the outbreak of
regional conflicts, the fracturing of national societies and in some cases the
destruction of entire countries. This crisis is by no means limited to the
developing countries. In Europe and North America the Welfare State is being
dismantled, schools and hospitals are being closed down creating conditions for
the outright privatisation of social services. By far this is the most serious
economic crisis in modern history.

In a large number of developing countries, the services economy and banking are
already in the hands of foreign capital, peasant economies have been devastated
as a result of the dumping of EU and US grain surpluses. Genetically modified
seeds produced among others by Cargill and Montsanto (together with carefully
engineered farm inputs produced by these same agribusiness conglomerates) have
been forced upon farmers throughout the World often leading to mass poverty and
the fracture of rural economies, not to mention the contamination of the food
chain derogating the rights of consumers Worldwide.

In turn, international agribusiness is intent upon driving the family farm into
bankruptcy. This process is by no means limited to developing countries: up to
30 percent of grain farmers in Western Canada are on the verge of bankruptcy
specifically as a result of the enforcement of WTO provisions concerning farm
subsidies by the Canadian government. And if this is happening in Western
Canada which constitutes one of the World's most resourceful "bread baskets",
what will be the fate of farmers in other regions of World?

CHINA'S ACCESSION TO THE WTO

The terms of China's accession to the WTO agreed upon in bilateral negotiations
with the United States barely a few weeks before the Ministerial Conference in
Seattle, spells havoc in a country of more than one billion population. It will
devastate China's agriculture; it will trigger a deadly wave of bankruptcies of
State enterprises leading to mass unemployment. The provision of "national
treatment" to Western banks could potentially precipitate the fracture of the
entire structure of Chinese State banking...

The Chinese authorities fully aware of the ramifications, have attempted in a
publicity stunt to convince Chinese public opinion that "the benefits from the
agreement would justify the job losses and bankruptcies it will cause".8 In the
words of China's chief WTO negotiator Mr. Long Yongtu "a nation cannot develop
and become strong without a sense of urgency and a sense of crisis."9

ANALYSING AND EVALUATING THE NEW WORLD ORDER

In the face of global economic and social devastation, is an (official) "Audit"
really required as put forth in the "Statement From Members of International
Civil Society" to ascertain what is happening? Some of the NGO critics
--including the trade unions-- involved in the dialogue with the WTO argue that
there are both "positive" and "negative" impacts of trade liberalisation. This
position is ambiguous: the devastating impacts of "globalisation" are already
known and documented, the NGO community has already produced a wealth of
critical analysis and research. Moreover, the audit proposal accepts the
legitimacy of the WTO, it presupposes that there are mistakes and "lets talk
and put this system on hold" for a few years "while we re-evaluate".

Do we need an Audit to ascertain "whether or not" the World is in crisis? And
by whom will this Audit be performed and for whom? The key "partner NGOs" have
already positioned themselves to undertake the relevant commissioned background
studies. Many of the organisations which signed and endorsed the "Statement"
were unaware that the Audit with part of the "Dialogue" with the WTO and
Western governments. And these research contracts performed "sector by sector"
in a "politically correct" fashion according to pre-established guidelines set
by the funding agencies will take several years to complete.

The conduct of an Audit has already been accepted by the European Union in its
consultations with the NGOs. Former European Commissioner Sir Leon Brittan, on
behalf of the European Union had in fact proposed in 1998, "the commissioning
of a study on the impact of the new Round on sustainable development" (European
Commission, op. cit). In other words, the Audit is also part of the official
agenda of the Seattle Round. In the meantime, while the Audit is being
conducted, economic, social and environmental destruction will continue
unabated.

THE MILLENIUM ROUND IS ALREADY "DE FACTO"

What happens to the World system does not depend solely on the results of the
Millenium Round. We must understand that in many developing countries, many of
the clauses of the Millenium Round are already a "fait accompli". The are part
of the "conditionalities contained in ad hoc loan agreements with the IMF and
the World Bank. Under the structural adjustment programme as well as in the
context of the IMF sponsored "bailout agreements" (eg. Indonesia, Thailand,
Korea, Brazil), developing countries have already committed themselves to many
of the propositions contained in the Millenium Round.

Moreover, the hands of Third World delegates to Seattle are tied, the vote of
most of the trade ministers from developing countries at the Seattle
Ministerial Conference is controlled by Western creditors. It is unlikely that
much opposition will be voiced from the official delegations from developing
countries.

Many developing countries have accepted in the context of agreements signed
with the Bretton Woods instititions to liberalise trade, deregulate capital
movements, privatise State public utilities, dismantle social programmes and
provide "national treatment" to foreign investors in a large number of economic
activities including services, banking, procurement, etc. These provisions are
often coupled with a "bankruptcy programme" under the supervision of the World
Bank with a view to "triggering" the liquidation of competing national
enterprises. An "enabling free market environment" is implanted (without
recourse to WTO clauses pertaining to "effective access to markets"), national
producers are brutally displaced and destroyed, countries are casually
recolonised...

Wall Street bankers and the heads of the World's largest business conglomerates
are indelibly behind this process. They interface regularly with IMF, World
Bank and WTO officials in closed sessions as well as in numerous international
venues. Moreover, participating in these meetings and consultations are the
representatives of powerful global business lobbies including the International
Chamber of Commerce (ICC), The Trans Atlantic Business Dialogue (TABD) (which
brings together in its annual venues the leaders of the largest Western
business conglomerates with politicians and WTO officials), the United States
Council for International Business (USCIB), the Davos World Economic Forum, the
Institute of International Finance representing the World's largest banks and
financial institutions, etc. Other "semi-secret" organisations --which play an
important role in shaping the institutions of the New World Order--  include
the Trilateral Commission, the Bildebergers and the Council on Foreign
Relations.

FINANCIAL DEREGULATION

To top it off, "perfect timing": the deregulation of the US banking system was
approved by the US Senate barely six weeks before the Millennium Round meetings
in Seattle. The new legislation favours an unprecedented concentration of
global financial power. In the wake of lengthy negotiations which concluded in
the early hours of October 22nd, all regulatory restraints on Wall Street's
powerful banking conglomerates were revoked "with a stroke of the pen". Under
the new rules ratified by the US Senate and approved by President Clinton,
commercial banks, brokerage firms, hedge funds, institutional investors,
pension funds and insurance companies can freely invest in each others
businesses as well as fully integrate their financial operations. The
legislation has repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, a pillar of President
Roosevelt's "New Deal" which was put in place in response to the climate of
corruption, financial manipulation and "insider trading" which led to more than
5,000 bank failures in the years following the 1929 Wall Street crash.10

In other words, a handful of financial conglomerates will gain effective
control over the entire US financial services industry. Coincidentally these
same Wall Street financial giants are also the main beneficiaries of financial
services' deregulation under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)
which provides "national treatment" to Wall Street's giants in banking,
insurance, brokerage services, actuarial services, etc. The GATS is almost
"tailor-made" to meet the standards set under the new US financial services
legislation. The financial giants oversee the real economy Worldwide, they are
creditors and shareholders of high tech manufacturing, the defence industry,
major oil and mining consortia, etc. Moreover, as underwriters of the public
debt, they also have a stranglehold on national governments and politicians.
Ultimately, they also call the shots on trade reform in Seattle.

Moreover, the clauses of the defunct MAI which was to provide "national
treatment" to foreign banks and MNCs (leading to the dislocation of
municipalities and local governments) is also in the process of becoming a
"fait accompli". The financial conglomerates are now fully integrated with the
insurance companies. In turn,  the latter oversee and control the multinational
health care providers which are actively lobbying in Seattle for the
deregulation of public health care under the GATS. The institutions of the
Welfare State are to be scrapped. The struggles of the entire post-war period
are to be erased.

The Worldwide scramble to appropriate wealth through "financial manipulation"
is the driving force behind this restructuring of the global financial
architecture of which the new US banking legislation and the "Seattle Round"
are an integral part. In concert with the WTO, the US legislation favours the
elimination of remaining barriers to the free movement of finance capital. In
practice it empowers Wall Street's key players including Merrill Lynch,
Citigroup, J. P, Morgan, Deutsche Bank-Bankers Trust, etc. to develop a
hegemonic position in global banking overshadowing and ultimately destabilising
financial systems in Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe... and this process
is ongoing irrespective of the actual outcome of the Millenium Round.

THE SPECULATIVE ONSLAUGHT

In turn, financial deregulation in the US allows speculative trade to prosper
Worldwide in a totally permissive environment. In turn, the Millenium Round by
calling for the deregulation of capital movements will provide greater
legitimacy to speculative trade thereby empowering Wall Street to extend its
global financial domain.

Institutional control over the channels of speculative trade provides the US
and EU financial giants with the tools to manipulate currency and stock markets
and impair the role of central banks. The ultimate objective is to take control
over the reigns of monetary policy and oversee financial markets all over the
World. In the 1997 Asian crisis alone, more than 100 billion dollars were
confiscated in a matter of months from the vaults of Asia's central banks;
similar speculative assaults were carried out in Russia in 1998 and in Brazil
in 1999. Derivative and option trade including the "short selling" of national
currencies were behind these assaults leading to massive debt default and
financial collapse. Well documented, the IMF played a key role in facilitating
the speculative onslaught on behalf of Western and Japanese financial
institutions.

In a cruel irony, the use of these deadly speculative instruments  was formally
legitimised in the Fifth Protocol of the General Agreement on Trade in Services
(GATS) in the immediate wake of the Asian crisis. Totally disregarding the
impending dangers, the GATS protocol negotiations coincided chronologically
(October 1997) with the climactic meltdown of stock markets all over the World.


WAR AND GLOBALISATION

And War is also part of the Millennium Round. What happens to countries which
refuse to deregulate trade and foreign investment and provide "national
treatment" to Western banks and MNCs? The Western military-intelligence
apparatus and its various bureaucracies routinely interface with the financial
establishment. The IMF, the World Bank and the WTO --which "police" country
level economic reforms-- also collaborate with NATO in its various
"peacekeeping" endeavours, not to mention the financing of "post-conflict"
reconstruction under the auspices of the Bretton Woods institutions...

At the dawn of the Third Millennium, War and the "Free Market" go hand in hand.
War does not require a multilateral investment treaty (ie. an MAI) entrenched
in international law: "War is the MAI of last resort." War physically destroys
what has not been dismantled through deregulation, privatisation and the
imposition of "free market" reforms. Outright colonisation through war and the
installation of Western protectorates is tantamount to providing "national
treatment" to Western banks and MNCs in all sectors of activity. "Missile
diplomacy" replicates and emulates the "gunboat diplomacy" used to enforce
"free trade" in the 19th Century. The US Cushing Mission to China in 1844 (in
the wake of the Opium Wars) had forewarned the Chinese imperial government
"that refusal to grant American demands might be regarded as an invitation to
war."11
The "Seattle Round" purports to "peacefully" recolonise countries through the
manipulation of market forces, --ie. through the "invisible hand". It
nonetheless constitutes a form of warfare.

More generally, the dangers of war must be understood. War and globalisation
are not separate issues. The citizens' campaign against the WTO must be
integrated with the anti-war movement against the bombing of sovereign
countries by the US and its European allies.

DISARMING THE NEW WORLD ORDER

The WTO created from a "technical agreement" (Final Act of the Uruguay Round)
provides entrenched "legal" rights to banks and global corporations. In turn
the 1994 Marrakesh Agreement sets up procedures --including manipulative
Dispute Settlements-- which are now conveniently embodied in international law
but which blatantly violate the rights of citizens all over the World.

Under WTO rules, the banks and MNCs can legitimately manipulate market forces
to their advantage leading to the outright recolonisation of national
economies. In other words, the WTO articles provide legitimacy to global banks
and MNCs in their quest to destabilise institutions, drive national producers
into bankruptcy and ultimately take control of entire countries.

Moreover, the Agreement formally instates a "triangular division of authority"
between the WTO, and its sister organisations the IMF and the World Bank in a
system of "global surveillance" of developing countries' economic and social
policies. This means that enforcement of IMF-World Bank policy prescriptions
will no longer hinge upon ad hoc country-level loan agreements (which are not
"legally binding" documents). All the main clauses of the IMF's deadly
"economic medicine" will eventually become permanently entrenched under the
Seattle Millenium Round. Countries will not only be "bonded" by external debt,
they will be permanently "enslaved" by an international body controlled by the
World's largest business syndicates. These WTO articles will set the
foundations for "policing" countries (and enforcing "conditionalities")
according to international law.

In other words, we must act in relation to the original "iniquity" and
"illegality" of the Final Act of the Uruguay Round which creates the WTO as a
"totalitarian" organisation. There can be no other alternative but to
reject the
WTO as an international institution, to imprint the WTO as an illegal
organisation. In other words, the entire process must be rejected outright.

And this means that citizens' movements around the World must pressure their
governments to withdraw without delay and cancel their membership with the WTO.
Legal proceedings must also be initiated in national courts against the
governments of member countries, underscoring the blatant violation of domestic
laws and national constitutions.

In other words, the citizens' platform in Seattle and around the World must be
geared towards disarming this economic system and dismantling its institutions.
We cannot postpone our struggle and "wait a few years" in the context of an
"Audit" and meanwhile the World is consumed and destroyed. We must act now. We
must question the legitimacy of a system which ultimately destroys people's
lives.

We must challenge politicians and international officials, we must unmask their
insidious links to powerful financial interests and eventually we must overhaul
and transform State institutions removing them from the clutch of the finacial
establishment. In turn, we must "democratise" the economic system and its
management structure, challenge the blatant concentration of ownership and
private wealth, disarm financial markets, freeze  speculative trade, arrest the
laundering of dirty money, dismantle the system of offshore banking,
redistribute income and wealth, restore the rights of direct producers, rebuild
the Welfare State.

Concurrently, we must also build the conditions for a lasting World peace. The
military-industrial and security apparatus which sustains these financial
interests must eventually be dismantled, which also means that we must abolish
NATO and phase out the arms industry.

We must combat the "media lies" and "global falsehoods" which uphold the WTO
and the powerful business interests which it supports. We must combat the
"false consensus" of Washington and Wall Street which ordains the "free market
system " as the only possible choice on the fated road to a "global
prosperity".  This consensus is now shared by all political parties including
Social Democrats.

To achieve these objectives we must restore a meaningful freedom of the press.
The global media giants fabricate the news and overtly distorts the course of
World events. In turn, we must break the "false consciousness" which pervades
our societies, prevents critical debate and masks the truth. Ultimately , it
precludes a collective understanding of the workings of an economic system
which destroys people's lives. The only promise of the "free market" is a World
of landless farmers, shuttered factories, jobless workers and gutted social
programmes with "bitter economic medicine" under the WTO and the IMF
constituting the only prescription. We must restore the truth, we must
reinstate sovereignty to our countries and to the people of our countries.

The struggle must be broad-based and democratic encompassing all sectors of
society at all levels, in all countries, uniting in a major thrust workers,
farmers, independent producers, small businesses, professionals, artists, civil
servants, members of the clergy, students and intellectuals. People must be
united across sectors, "single issue" groups must join hands in a common and
collective understanding on how this economic system destroys and impoverishes.
The "globalisation" of this struggle is fundamental, requiring a degree of
solidarity and internationalism unprecedented in World history. The global
economic system feeds on social divisiveness between and within countries.
Beyond Seattle, unity of purpose and Worldwide coordination among diverse
groups and social movements is crucial. A major thrust is required which brings
together social movements in all major regions of the world in a common pursuit
and commitment to the elimination of poverty and a lasting World peace.



NOTES


1. The latter frequently position snipers at key positions. See Paul Richmond,
"An Assessment of the Police, What to expect during the Seattle Ministerial
Conference", http://forward.to/walkout, September 1999.

2. WTO Press Release, Ruggiero Announces Enhanced WTO Plan for Cooperation With
NGOs, 17 July 1998.

3. European Commission Press Release, "Commission and NGOs hold dialogue on the
Millennium Round", Brussels, 17 November 1998.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

6. See AFL-CIO, Make the Global economy Work for Working familiies,
http://www.wslc.org/wto/index.htm, Ocotber 1999.


7. Ibid.

8. Financial Times, London, 17 November 1999).

9. Quoted in Financial Times, op cit.

10. See Martin McLaughlin, "Clinton Republicans agree to Deregulation of US
Banking System", World Socialist website, 1 November 1999.

11. Quoted in Michel Chossudovsky, Towards Capitalist Restoration, Chinese
socialism after Mao, Macmillan, London, 1986, p. 134).



C Copyright by Michel Chossudovsky, Ottawa, 1999. All rights reserved.
Permission is granted to post this text on noncommercial community internet
sites, provided the essay remains intact and the copyright note is displayed.
To publish this text in printed and/or other forms contact the author at
chossudovsky@videotron.ca, fax: 1-514-4256224.


 Michel Chossudovsky

    Department of Economics,
    University of Ottawa,
    Ottawa, K1N6N5
    Voice box: 1-613-562-5800, ext. 1415,  Fax: 1-514-425-6224
    E-Mail: chossudovsky@videotron.ca   (Alternative Email:
chossudovsky@sprint.ca)

Recent articles:

Post-war Kosovo http://members.xoom.com/_XOOM/yugo_archive/19990816mcpaper.htm
Overview on the War: http://www.transnational.org/features/Yuoverview.html
On the role of the KLA: http://www.heise.de/tp/english/inhalt/co/2743/1.html
Breakup of Yugoslavia: http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/62/022.html
Impact of the bombings:
http://www.diaspora-net.org/food4thought/chossudovsky.htm

On The Globalisation of Poverty and the Financial Crisis:
http://wwwdb.ix.de/tp/english/special/eco/6373/1.html
http://www.transnational.org/features/chossu_worldbank.html
http://www.transnational.org/features/g7solution.html
http://www.twnside.org.sg/souths/twn/title/scam-cn.htm
http://www.southside.org.sg/souths/twn/title/trig-cn.htm
http://www.heise.de/tp/english/special/eco/
http://heise.xlink.de/tp/english/special/eco/6099/1.html#anchor1
http://www.ased.org/resources/global/articles/chossu.htm


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net