Indira Kajosevic on Tue, 11 May 1999 21:00:22 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> The Greater United States by IVO SKORIC |
The Greater United States We are entering 21st century as the Greater United States of America where the adjectives "civilised" and "democatic" are more or less used to describe the societies most closely resembling the American society: and with the exception of China, underdeveloped countries in Africa and Far East, rich Arab sheikdoms and a few other places (like Vatican) the world is not only looking up to America, but it is looking more and more LIKE America - for better or worse. At this moment I am in Germany, out in the countryside: teenagers on skateboards and rollerblades in baggy clothes with baseball hats pass by me. Germany looks like a cleaned up and more solid America. The cars are newer, the roads are faster, the buildings are build from real bricks and concrete, the lawns are mowed and everything is so unbearably neat, yet I don't feel as if left New England at all. The politicians on TV debating the Kosovo Crisis readily admit German dependency on the U.S. There is nearly no second thoughts that it shouldn't be like that. Province of Germania Germany is like a perfect American state. With all the upsides and no downsides. Which means the population on average is or at least looks wealthier than the original U.S. population. They are rich. So there is no reason to dispute the American model - it worked well for them, in fact - it worked better for them than for Americans. The war against Yugoslavia is a minor nuissance. Yes, it is the first time German army is involved abroad. But it gives Germans a sense of pride, particularly because the involvement was originally presented as a humanitarian one. Germans love to be seen as the do-gooders of the world - even more so than the Americans. Perhaps, this goes with a certain past sense of guilt. The problem is that the NATO action in Yugoslavia long ago exhausted its humanitarian grounds and became a self-fulfilling goal, a grinding media spectacle that everybody seems to be eager to end but no one seems to have the will to stop shooting first. Corresponding to the similarities between the two societies, Germans are divided along the same lines as Americans on the Kosovo Crisis: conservative right ridiculizes the war and the left coalition government that seems so awkwardly suited to participate in it, Die Gruenen, which in the U.S. would be the best described as the left liberals, oppose the war more and more by the day - since the Chinese embassy bombing, the entire parlamentary faction opposes NATO, which threatens the survival of the SPD-Gruenen coalition government. PSD, the former East German communists, that won the same ammount of votes like Die Gruenen but did not enter the government coalition, oppose NATO action from the beginning. Moreover the polls show that Germans inhabiting the region formerly known as East Germany oppose the bombing with a sharp difference in percentage (around 30) from their peers who had the privilege to live in Amerocracy for a tad longer. In other words the war that was supposed to unite the western governments threatens now not only to divide them but also to destroy some of them. Jossca Fischer, German foreign minister, member of Die Gruenen is tortured between his Party and his Government. His recent comparison between Kosovo refugees fate and the fate of the victims of Auschwitz is in the direct opposition to his earlier saying that Auschwitz could not be compared to anything. His boss, Chancellor Shroeder, while publicly still expressing full support for NATO action, works now full time on diplomatic peace solution, that seems the only way to preserve his government and his country: in the past few days he met with Kosovo provisional president Ibrahim Rugova, Russian Kosovo negotiator Viktor Chernomyrdin and today he packed for China. Province of Serbia When you look at the pictures from demonstrations in Belgrade you will realize that you see yet another U.S. province. Kosovo refugees and their Serb tormentors wear Bulls T-shirts and Nike sneakers. The Belgrade youth add to that a more urbane touch of a baseball cap and baggy pants. Belgrade could be in Germany, or for that matter in the U.S. Yet it is a residence of evil fascist government, as Berlin once was. So, what do we do? Are the U.S. and allies prepared to level Serbia's cities like they once leveled German cities (Nuerenberg for example had just 10% habitable housing in 1945.) or like Serbs leveled cities in Croatia and Bosnia (Vukovar fared worse than Nuerenberg 50 years later)? Can countries, that rely on image of civilized and democratic, involve themselves in something so decidedly barbaric? NATO spokesman Shea already, in his shabby explanations of NATO failures, reminds me of general Mladic and his reasoning: he couldn't get that smirk of his face during his talk on how NATO threw Serbia into darkness with graphite bombs. But what about hospitals without electricity? Was not that one of the principal objections to the Serb siege of Sarajevo? Can we behave like Serbs, yet pretend we are something better? Serb Television did its job of filming the massacre caused by cluster bombs in Nis as good as CNN did their job of filming the massacre in the Sarajevo Market. Of course, the TV may show things more dramatic - and both the CNN and RTS tend to do that, but as the fact, that Serbs lobed a grenade in the busy Sarajevo marketplace, stays, so the fact that NATO used cluster bombs stay - and cluster bombs are banned, because their prime use is destruction of life. The Serbs were reprimanded for using cluster bombs in Croatia many times by the international community. Now the same international community is using the bombs against the Serbs. A poetic justice? But this is not Hollywood . Maybe this is a case of another mistake - like the support personnel loaded wrong bombs to the plane. There were many mistakes so far, and there were more of them as the campaign progressed of saturation - NATO exhausted primary target list and media exhausted the public interest to the point where death of civilians leaves many dangerously emotionally uninvolved: missiles hit residential quarters in Aleksinac and Surdulica, bombs hit passenger trains and buses, large cities were left without power and water.... all in the name of saving Kosovo Albanians, who are now evacuated from subhumane living conditions in camps in Macedonia to Great Britain and USA (precisely what was initially hoped to be avoided). The NATO reaction is a "form apology" - we regret the tragedy, we deplore the loss of life, etc. - the same that international community used for years to excuse themselves from action against the Serbs atrocities against Bosnia, they use now to excuse themselves from their own atrocities against Serbia. The other thing we hear from NATO and US officials more and more (and it is in a stark opposition to the "form apology") is a desperate: "we have to win this war" (Kissinger joined the chorus just recently, too) - but there is no answers on "why?", and more importantly, on "how?" they intend to accomplish that victory with a stand that no ground troops can be used. Coast to Coast: the philosophy of collateral damage As the war goes on, there is more collateral damage showing up, and there is more public willingness to accept it without an outrage: the U.S. police philosophy that in queasy situations it is OK to use overwhelming firepower first and then ask questions became widely accepted code of conduct of international community vs. Serbia. In New York city a black unarmed immigrant was shot 19 times by white policemen ASSUMING that he was armed and shooting at them. In Los Angeles an unconscious black woman with a pistol on her lap was shot 12 times by white policemen ASSUMING that she was getting up and shooting at them. Those two cases show several characteristics of American society: 1.. blacks are still considered as a danger per se, particularly suspicious and scary individuals 2.. the U.S. police is very light on trigger when persons described under a) are in question 3.. there is this fascination with the overwhelming firepower to the point of overkill (19 times...) 4.. there is politically correct regret for the loss of innocent lives, but there is no real reprimand of the police practices since those victims are considered a "collateral damage" of the otherwise stellar police work in two largest American cities. On the international level, all non-westerners are considered dangerous, suspicious, untrustworthy and scary. It is not difficult to kill them preventively since they are perceived danger. And the destruction has to be done with an ammount of firepower worthy of the superpower. The loss of life would be formally apologized for, but it would not stop the determination, since it would be registered as an acceptable "collateral damage." This thinking is exactly what - correctly - scared India, Russia and China. The punishment that Serbia receives now, can sometimes in the future be appropriated to somebody else who angered the big brother. Actually, the loss of Chinese life ALREADY is accepted as the "collateral damage" by the "international community" (which always means the rich western states under the umbrella of the U.S.). Not one but four cruise missiles hit the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade by mistake. The missiles were intended for the Hotel Jugoslavija, which is Arkan's Tigers stronghold. However, the hotel is more than 500 meters away from the Embassy and there is no buildings around the Embassy. In other words it is very hard to believe that four cruise missiles at the same time veered of course way above specifications and all in the same direction. This sounds like a man who killed himself by falling on the knife four times. So, NATO came up with the explanation that it was an intelligence mixup: somebody gave them wrong coordinates. That's sweet. In other words the accuracy of NATO campaign depends on local spies who radio in the gps coordinates of the targets!? That seems to be a recipe for global disaster. Arkan, of course, showed up on TV, healthy, in good shape and well dressed (perhaps after his people tortured the CIA codes out of the poor spy), extremely amused by Americans hitting the Chinese embassy. On loosing the face Since this war failed in its primary objective of preventing the humanitarian dissaster, it became mostly about saving the face. The most powerful bloc of nations ever existing on our planet - NATO - cannot afford to be taken for fools by some sarcastic rogue boogeyman from the Balkans. To stop the bombing with Kosovo ethnically cleansed of Albanians and Milosevic still in power in Yugoslavia, would be understood as a certain NATO's defeat, and with loosing this war, NATO would loose the face, and nobody would ever take it seriously any more. This philosophy drives the NATO airplanes in their mission of destruction night after night after night. South Africa's Mandela offered asylum to Milosevic: that would spare Serbia further disaster, while saving NATO's face. But this does not take Milosevic's character into account: he is stubborn, recalcitrant and belligerent. He will drive Serbia into complete destruction, but he will not let NATO reveal in victory. The interesting "Jeopardy" question is: when will NATO start loosing face in the process of not winning the war while beating a European country to a pulp? It is like a superior boxer who beats his opponent but somehow can't knock him down. Around the tenth round the public starts to sympathize with the looser, and when the judge declare victory by the points, public boos the winner. Ivo Skoric Am Wirtskreuz 8 D-94534 Haselbach Ivo@reporters.net http://balkansnet.org --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl