reclaim the streets on Sun, 25 Apr 1999 21:44:14 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Eco-war in Kosovo [NATO poisons civillians] |
>From: "George Monbiot" <g.monbiot@zetnet.co.uk> (by way of genetics ><genetics@gn.apc.org>) >Subject: -ALLSORTS- Eco-war in Kosovo [NATO poisons civillians] >Mime-Version: 1.0 >X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.gn.apc.org id >VAA11807 > > >Here's this week's article from George Monbiot > >The Nato commanders trying to explain what happened to the refugee convoy they >bombed sounded rather like the police at the Stephen Lawrence enquiry. They did >their utmost to appear contrite, without actually apologising. Sorry, for the >guardians of law and order, always seems to be the hardest word.@ > >But even as the alliance tied itself in circumlocutory knots, it continued to >engage in the slaughter of non-combatants. Slowly, largely silently, it is >killing thousands of civilians. They are being neither bombed nor shot: the >people of the former Yugoslavia are being poisoned.@ > >Nato's immediate war aim is to destroy the Serb economy, in order to restrict >Milosevic's capacity either to attack the Kosovo Albanians or to retaliate >against Nato troops. This may or may not be working. But whatever its impact on >the Yugoslav Republic's economy might be, Nato is succeeding in wiping out its >ecology.@ > >The Nato press office claims that it has "no idea" how many chemical plants and >oil installations its bombers have hit. But it concedes that there have been >multiple raids on a vast oil refinery and chemicals complex in the suburbs of >Belgrade, on another chemicals facility close to the capital and on an oil >refinery at Novi Sad, in the north of the country.@ > >Britain's Ministry of Defence told me yesterday that the bombers are "keeping >the risks of pollution to a minimum", but it was unable to explain how, while >blowing chemicals plants to pieces, they have achieved this commendable feat. >Nato informed me that "the smoke from these fires is barely comparable to the >smoke caused by the Yugoslav attacks on several hundred villages". It's clear >that neither agency has the faintest idea what it's talking about.@ > >The chemical tanks ruptured by Nato bombers on the outskirts of Belgrade last >week contained a number of lethal pollutants. Some held a complex mixture of >hydrocarbons called "naphtha", others housed phosgene and chlorine (both of >which were used as chemical weapons in the First World War), and hydrochloric >acid. As the factories burnt, a poisoned rain, containing hundreds of toxic >combustion products, splattered Belgrade, its suburbs and the surrounding >countryside. Broken tanks and burst pipes poured naphtha, chlorine, ethylene >dichloride and transformer oil, all deadly poisons, into the Danube. Oil slicks >up to twelve miles long wound their way towards Romania.@ > >It could, it seems, have been worse. Scientists at the plant claimed that one >of the bombs "grazed" a vast vat of liquid ammonia. If that had gone up, it >would have poisoned most of the people of Belgrade.@ > >These toxins are unlikely to kill people immediately. But they will have soaked >the soil across hundreds of square miles and percolated into the aquifers. The >people of the former Yugoslavia, as a result, will be repeatedly exposed to >them. Many of the compounds released cause cancers, miscarriages and birth >defects. Others are associated with fatal nerve and liver diseases. The effects >of the bombing of Serbia's economy equate, in other words, to low-intensity >chemical warfare.@ > >Nato might also be waging an undeclared, invisible nuclear war. During the Gulf >War, the Allies deployed a new kind of munition: bullets and bombs tipped with >depleted uranium, or DU. DU, being heavier than lead or steel, penetrates >armour more effectively. In lump form it is only moderately harmful, but when >the munitions explode they scatter thousands of particles, small enough to be >inhaled. The Atomic Energy Authority predicted that if 50 tonnes of DU dust >were released in Iraq, 500,000 people would die of cancer. In the event, >according to the Campaign Against Depleted Uranium in Manchester, some 700-900 >tonnes of DU were deployed. The result, the investigator Felicity Arbuthnot >found, is a seven-fold increase in leukaemia and a massive rise in the >incidence of certain rare cancers in Iraq. Thousands of Iraqi children have >been born without eyes, limbs, brains and genitalia. DU has also been >associated by some scientists with Gulf War Syndrome.@ > >I asked the MoD whether DU is being deployed in the former Yugoslavia. >"Certainly not", the press office replied. I asked Nato. "It's used in some >American munitions", I was told.@ > >This, in environmental terms at least, is perhaps the dirtiest war the West has >ever fought. Nato's scorched earth policy, which seeks to destroy Milosevic's >armed capacity by destroying everything else, places the Alliance firmly on the >wrong side of the Geneva Convention. For a war which targets chemical factories >and oil installations, which deploys radioactive weapons in towns and cities, >is a war against everyone: civilians as well as combatants, the unborn as well >as the living. As such, it can never be a just one.@ >============= >and more news from ALLSORTS - > A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E > <http://www.ainfos.ca/>http://www.ainfos.ca/ >________________________________________________ > >ATENAS, Greeks Stone, Stop NATO Convoy Apr. 15 - About > >500 Greeks turned back a convoy of NATO trucks carrying military equipment to >Macedonia on Thursday in protest against the alliance's air strikes against >Yugoslavia, the Reuters news wire reported on Apr. 15. > > Police said the protestors blocked the national road a few kilometers >(miles) before the Evzoni border crossing at the Greek-Macedonian frontier, and >forced the 15-truck convoy to turn back after smashing the leading vehicle's >windows with stones. To work for delight and authentic festivity is barely distinguishable from preparing for a general insurrection." Raoul Vaneigem, The Revolution of Everyday Life. --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl