Sid Shniad (by way of David Hudson <dwh@berlin.snafu.de>) on Fri, 9 Apr 1999 02:31:17 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> U.S. petition against war in Kosovo |
[orig to <ccpa@policyalternatives.ca>.] Dear Friends, Please sign the Resolution for Peace in Kosovo as developed by the San Francisco Progressive Challenge (see below) by sending to Wade Hudson <whudson@igc.org> the following message: YES KOSOVO [YOUR NAME] [YOUR CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE] Also, people can sign the resolution at: http://www.igc.org/esp/Resolution.htm +++++++++++++ Resolution for Peace in Kosovo Whereas the NATO military attack on Yugoslavia and the withdrawal of United Nation observers escalated the violations of the human rights of the Kosovo Albanian people by Yugoslavia, and bombing Yugoslavia will not protect the Kosovo Albanian people, and the occupation of Kosovo by NATO ground troops would magnify tensions, expose those troops to ongoing attacks indefinitely, and likely never be viable politically, and the NATO attack on Yugoslavia weakens democratic components, and strengthens undemocratic components, within Yugoslavia and neighboring countries, and the NATO attack on Yugoslavia encourages armed forces within Kosovo to refuse to negotiate a peaceful solution to the conflict, and the NATO attack on Yugoslavia threatens to destabilize neighboring countries by contributing to the migration of tens of thousands of refugees into those countries, and since NATO can legally attack a sovereign nation only in self-defense or with United Nations authorization, the NATO attack on Yugoslavia violates international law, weakens the United Nations, and sets a dangerous precedent, and the NATO attack on Yugoslavia will kill and injure innocent civilians, and the United States Congress has not declared war on Yugoslavia or invoked the War Powers Act, and the NATO attack on Yugoslavia is a dangerous precedent that could encourage separatist forces in other countries to engage in violence in hope of eliciting military support from other countries, and the NATO attack on Yugoslavia will damage our relationship with Russia and increase the danger of a major nuclear war, and the United States should support democratic movements without relying so heavily on military force, and the international community has not developed a consensus concerning the conditions that justify the secession of one part of a country from an established nation, and the United States has failed to explain why military force was necessary for humanitarian reasons in this instance but was not necessary in other instances of equally or more serious violations of human rights, and this lack of consistency in the application of military force undermines trust in the United States, and the NATO attack on Yugoslavia promotes suspicions that the United States wants to dominate the world for its own interests rather than working cooperatively with other nations, the NATO attack on Yugoslavia contributes to the militarization of the economy, which consumes valuable financial resources that could be used more productively, be it therefore resolved that we the undersigned urge the United States and NATO to stop its military attack on Yugoslavia, and invite all interested parties (not just the combatants) to the negotiating table to reach a settlement agreeable to all parties, perhaps including a non-NATO peacekeeping force. -- Wade Hudson, Coordinator Economic Security Project San Francisco Progressive Challenge www.igc.org/esp --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl