scotartt on Thu, 1 Apr 1999 05:24:29 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> serbia |
The whole debate about the serbian situation on nettime is the most ludicrous thing on this list i've ever witnessed. Mostly everyone appears to be simply regurgitating the propaganda of whatever side they've happened to choose. Frankly, the situation just makes me realise, even more, that post-Cold War, 90% of the "left" (as exhibited in nettime anyway) in the world STILL has no idea how Diplomacy between nation states actually works. War by public opinion! I've never heard a more ridiculous thing. Public opinion, generally in my view, either exhibits a dangerous bloodthirsty lust for massacre or a pathetic pacificism usually centered around a lack of desire to see "our boys" hurt in conflict. But enough of that. Lets set some things straight about Serbia; its an oppresive regime, run by a capital-F Fascist, who is hell-bent on ridding his territory and those surrounding it of ethnic minorities. He has no trouble with using Genocide as a tool to achieve his ends. Anyone who defends this regime or any of its actions in perpetrating genocide in Kosova or anywhere else (regardless of NATO bombs) is by extension a Fascist also. Serbian apologists should ponder on that point. Decrying bombs does not require the uncritical slobbering support of Slobodan. Lets set some things straight about the KLA. They are nationalist guerrillas who dream of a Greater Albania, which if allowed to form, will one day be in the same murderously expansionist mood as Serbia is today, even if that is not their direct intention. Lets set some things straight about NATO. This operation has nothing to do with any Humanitarian Crisis, anywhere. This is irrelevant to NATO's mindset, except after the fact, i.e. when excuses are searched to tell the public, because, nowadays war isn't entered into for strategic reasons, its run by public opinion. This operation is about NATO's failure to prepare enough ground troops BEFORE threatening Milosovic. This operation is about saving NATO prestige, to stop it looking like an old toothless declawed tiger unable to hurt anyone outside its cage. Unfortunately, before they bothered to rattle swords over Kosovo, they should have deployd the three very necessary three divisions on the ground in its neighboring countries (but of course, public opinion won't allow for that). Now, they will have to bomb for a whole three months until they get the ground forces ready (and I hear on the radio that the Americans are running out of Cruise Missiles). The reality is, the only to stop a war on the ground is to fight it ON THE GROUND. This whole affair is about GEOPOLITICS! Gee, remember that? Anyone who thinks the "left" is automatically exempt from this disease is laughably uninformed, methinks. Lets state the obvious -- Serbia cannot be left unchecked. If NATO allowed Milosovic to continue to massacre civilians in Kosovo, it sends highly dangerous signals to an already dangerous undemocratic fascist regime. A regime whom we all know has alrady fought wars with neighbors, sponsored genocides by paramilitaries in territories adjacent to it. So anyone who thinks that, after the Kosovars are dealt with, that e.g. Macedonia is safe, or Montenegro is safe from Serbian aggression has their head firmly stuck in the sand. Lets state the obvious -- a "Greater Albania" is nearly as big a disaster. It could cause some section of Macedonia's 23% ethnic albanian population to start, or be the cause of, further instability in the region. Now to the abstract reality of the situation. Anyone who's read say Machiavelli, should know one of his cardinal rules about seizing power -- try not to do it using a foreign power's troops -- you'll end up with them permanently garrisoned in your city (ie you will be a client state of the foreign power). This was the strategy that NATO should have tried, and one that SERBIA of all countries should have welcomed -- i.e. by garrisoning troops around Kosovo the KLA would become controlled by NATO, or at least subject to its threat of force against it as much as the Serbian army would have. However, yes, NATO have just made it worse, emboldening the Albanian terrorists into believing they will win independance (which NATO never really wanted anyway), emboldening the Serbian State Terrorists into stepping up their massacres tenfold in what I can only describe as a "use it or lose it" last-ditch attempt to "cleanse" Albania of 90% of its population. For those who deny the reality of Serbian State Fascism, they are out there right now killing political MODERATES who never wanted an independant Kosovo, for God's sake. Schoolteachers! But NATO's rather dumb, unprepared and ill-thought actions have really thrown the whole thing into a mess, Greece, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Montenegro, Albania all may yet become involved in this conflict in one way or another. Russia is escalating the situation by sending warships! Funnily enough the one interesting geopolitical thing to come out of this is that its driving Iran away from Russia and closer to the US. I think the NATO situation is caused simply because Americans don't learn enough history (other than their own) in their schools -- they failed to see that the Balkans are traditionally the stage of the European nation's internecine power plays and it has been that way for at least a hundred years. Added to that the traditional American reluctance to become involved in "European Wars" means that they won't commit the necessary ground forces which are the only real actual hope of resolving the situation favourably. You may get from the gist of this message that I'm no pacificist, perhaps my years of military service, which drove me to a highly militant pacificism for many years afterward, is finally getting to me. I don't like wars, like any level-headed person. But wars are not half-hearted things. If you make a war, you better do it properly or it will come back around and bite you very nastily on the backside, as NATO is now discovering. Milosovic has been making war for 10 years now, and finally someone is making some back at him. His chickens have come home to roost. However, frankly, he should count his blessings (and he probably is, in private) that his enemy is just too gutless to fight that war in an effective manner. So, I decry NATO's bombs -- but only because they help the cause of Serbian Fascism and fail to check Albanian nationalism. If the bombing is stopped now, well, that's a blank check to Slobodan to do whatever the fuck he likes, so that's a bad thing! Having started the bombing, NATO's only real effective solution now is to escalate it, severely. And that means ground troops! But, I must say, I think NATO's already lost this war by being massively under-prepared for it, so maybe they should just get out now before the Russians are involved, and accept the reality that they are now a completely toothless tiger, and are helpless to save Kosovo from Genocide. Maybe Iran can help the Kosovars more effectively, and perhaps the Americans should let them. Europe will burn in the 21st century. I think that much is clear now. But please, will certain people stop filling my mailbox with naive Serbian/NATO propaganda. I expect better from this list. Wake up to reality. scot. -- >}} sysx sysx.apana.org.au sysx.autonomous.org autonomous.org {{< "It's like a record needle cuts a groove into the brain." >{{ http://autonomous.org/soundsite http://mp3.com/nerveagent }}< --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl