Toshimare Ogura on Fri, 9 Oct 1998 13:26:19 +0200 (MET DST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Movements against Network Domination In Japan |
[thanks to matt fuller and diana mccarty for editing this text] Movements against Network Domination In Japan By Toshimaru Ogura The Internet has generally been described as a decentralised system. Within it, people have immense power to communicate and to distribute their messages - in particular the ability to communicate with complete strangers, something previously monopolised by mass media. This is correct from a bird's-eye view of the Internet. But from each user's point of view, the Internet has a different form. The conditions and rules of participation in the network imposed upon the user also define access conditions to the Internet. The system manager of the network is able to decide almost everything independently from the ordinary user. The environment of the user is very much subject to change according to the attitude this 'super-user' takes. It is not so easy to protect ordinary users from the decisions of the super-user employed by government or company. >>The Enclosure Movement in Information Capitalism<< The innovation of computer communication network (CCN) has had a dual character from the beginning; one is the grass-roots character, the myth of Apple computer and radical hackers in U.S. hippy subculture; on the other hand, Arpanet created by the Pentagon. Hackers and media activists have struggled for their freedom against state interference and they have tried to disconnect from hierarchical networks and construct a computer counter culture with a tradition of freedom of cyberspace based on the grass-roots. But many countries, including Japan, introduced CCN as a state policy. Therefore, the view-point of freedom within CCN only has a very fragile basis. Freedom in CCN is not a de facto standard for network users. In the case of Japan, the spread of the Internet opened a possibility of various previously unexperienced information traffics. At the same time however, the mass of users retain the passive habits made during the mass media age. The interactive character of CCN does not function sufficiently. We have not only to construct economically, socially and politically concrete free-access conditions, but also to create new values of network use - self-valorisation for the cyber-proletariat. >>Case 1. Movement Against The Wiretap Bill<< For Japanese network activists, one of the biggest themes in recent years was a movement against a government-proposed wiretapping bill. As a result of the opposition movements, the Government has not yet legislated the bill. The Japanese Government insists that wiretapping is indispensable to investigate criminal organisations such as Yakuza and cult groups like AUM. But, this is only a poor excuse. It is well known that most of the wiretap investigations so far have been carried out illegally against left-wing political groups and various autonomous radical movements. [The Japanese Constitution defines that the privacy of all communication should be protected. Police cannot legally monitor communications except in very rare cases.] Large scale electronic surveillance by police needs a secret connection to the network backbone. Nippon Telephone & Telegram (NTT) monopolises the fundamental part of the communication infrastructure in Japan and has supported illegal wiretapping by police in several cases. Moreover, the backbone of the Internet passes through Nagata-cho where government agencies are concentrated. From an infrastructural point of view, these conditions give an advantage to the large-scale surveillance of CCN. Anti-wiretap-bill movements have been developed using the Internet. Specifically, we disclose the records of proceedings in the Laws Council of the Ministry of Justice and internal materials from the discussion in the Assembly. We criticise articles of the bill in detail including the understanding of the criminal situation and the government's emphasis on the fear of terrorism to justify the law. Various statements opposing the law from network activists, lawyers' organisations, labour unions and journalists' organisations appear on the web-pages of the Anti-Wiretap-Bill Project. By using the Internet, we realise the connection and co-operation of small groups - something impossible using phone, fax, mail, printed news letters and other traditional communication tools because of their technological character as one-way or one to one communication as well as the burden of their cost. However, the importance of action in the real world also remains. Mass protest action in the national assembly, mass meetings and demonstrations are indispensable in order to change real politics. >>Struggles in the Real world of Japan<< How are the conditions of the real world related to CCN in Japan? The situation has become very serious for us. NTT can already track the phone number and location of someone using a mobile phone. The phone number and address or location of the caller was previously private. Now it is outside the range of the legal protection of privacy. The traffic surveillance system, the so-called "N System" reads license plate of passing vehicles and transfers the data to a police mainframe. The system is an enormous data-base which can confirm which car ran through where and when. The police state that the N System is used for the investigation of traffic violations such as speeding. But, after the system was introduced, there was no increase in the arrest rate for violation of traffic regulations. The N system was however useful in the case of the AUM Shinri Kyo. It functioned as a system to sense the movement of the adherents' cars. There is a suspicion that the N System is being used as a surveillance system for public order, not for criminal investigation. Not only cars but bicycles have to be registered with the police. Using the police online computer system, bicycle theft can be confirmed from the registration number within moments. In Japan, private relationships tend to depend on public relationships - not as something co-operative but as a relationship dominated by the state. The concept of the family is used not only for kinship but for company organisation and state constitution. Therefore, private space is invaded by the state and public spaces like the street and community facilities are considered, not as belonging to people, but as possessions of the state. We must construct rights to the city as a fundamental human right - something established for several centuries in the West. >>Domination Behind Chaos<< This may seem strange because Japanese cities have a chaotic face - an exotic and disordered image - like the movie "Blade Runner", or as Chiba City appeared in the science-fiction novels by William Gibson. The big cities like Tokyo and Osaka have wooden houses like temporary shelters alongside high buildings, narrow, winding and labyrinthine paths intermingling with subways and highways. Address indication is insufficient. People from outside get lost easily. Though such disorder is visible, control of city space by the government and police is exhaustive. Street graffiti and posters are hardly seen, and there are few street vendors. The temporarily vehicle-free promenades on Sunday are being abolished one after another. The subway in New York recently got cleaned up - but the Japanese one has never been decorated with graffiti until now. Public transportation stops around 12 o'clock at night. The data base of inhabitants is complete. The family registration system, (koseki seido) which is characteristic of Japan, is the system of control by the state over the individual based on the patriarchal family. Now, this traditional patriarchal system works via a data-base. Movements in Japan have developed a struggle against such oppressive control: no family register system; no isolated education for handicapped people; no computers for surveillance and control; street rights for the homeless, and so on. Control and surveillance of the real world are done through the world of the computer network. The real world and CCN are seamlessly connected. We do not live in the dual worlds of the real "and" the "cyber". Both worlds form an inseparable, intertwined, one world. From the viewpoint of the information surveillance system of the state, our body is a terminal for CCN and a check-point in the real world. Our body belongs to the world of the real and the cyber. Therefore, our real/cyber body is a battlefield for liberation movements for one world. >>Failure of Information Manipulation<< Just as eighteenth century industrial capitalism established the work ethic, post-industrial information capitalism has to establish a communications ethic. The freedom to send information as a fundamental right didn't get firmly established in Japan in the age of mass media. Free radio stations hardly exist except for a few, such Radio Home Run, and experimental practices by Tetsuo Kogawa and Jun Oenoki. There are no free radio stations by radicals. On the other side, the Internet expanded the circuit of information for individuals by using web, mail, newsgroups and so on. Network users come to doubt to the mass media system through the experience of hyper-text and interactive communication on CCN. But, this is not enough to guarantee the formation of new and alternative circuits of information in the real world. The Japanese police arrest users who link to sites abroad upon which appear contents that would be illegal in Japan. Counter culture has shaped alternative information network behind the scenes of the mass media. CCN allows people a similar power to publish information to mass media. Accordingly, counter cultures become increasingly independent and form their own communication networks. Dominant cultural capital cannot create new cultural product by their own effort, they need to exploit counter/sub culture. But, The cultural industry faces the loss of their resources. In response, they try to integrate counter-culture and to restructure the order of the networks. The monopolisation of so-called intellectual property and copyrights is their prime strategy for forcing an enclosure movement on CCN. This new enclosure movement tries to establish information structures along capitalist lines; tracing the line of property, sorting according to possibilities for commodification and criminalising some forms of information. Electronic surveillance and wiretapping by police, and the information enclosure movement by mass media are in close co-operation with each other. Both are processes of a new cyber/real world order of information. If network users are integrated into this order, they are forced to exploit their communicative work and depend on the moral standards made by this new master. >>Crisis of Domination<< The modern system of domination in the 20th century has been based on a one-way information system. The modern nation state has reproduced nationalism by the mass media and mass democracy. The effective function of universal suffrage was guaranteed only by such one-way information systems. The public receives a large quantity of information one-sidedly through the mass media. The mass media behaves as if it represents public opinion and forms a stereotypical view of the world. The election system quantifies public opinion by the votes cast. Minority groups realise their interests only by the sympathy of majority groups. The people's will is quantified and reduced to national will, national identity. The necessity of the reduction of people's opinion to quantified data is dependent on the level of data-processing technology. Individuals turn into a countable mass. Computer technology overcomes such a limit of data-processing. From the management of customers to public welfare policy, individuals recover their own characteristic attributes. At the same time, computer technology has been developed for the interactive communication of individuals. People need not necessarily present their opinions solely by voting or entrusting them to a candidate. They can make them themselves by using CCN. >>Toward A Revolution of Singularity<< CCN gives a means of expression to minority groups without depending on the paternalism of the majority or of the representative system. Various connections amongst minority groups across state boundaries realises world-wide solidarity. The geographical border becomes meaningless. People who have the same interest cross borders and cooperate. As a result of this, national identity begins to vacillate. People prefer direct expression in the network to a quantified voting system. The limits to a political system of decision by the majority come into the open. Young people's voter turnout is very low in Japan. They distrust the representative system. They become not apolitical, but refuse quantification of their political will. They try to constitute self-valorisation of their own information. This is a possibility for a new and radical politics of singularity even though it is still perhaps at an unconscious level. It may even become an opportunity to dismantle the nation state, patriarchy and nationalism in Japan. ((((((((((((^o^)))))))))) NO!! WIRETAP BILL ** toshimaru ogura ** ** ogr@nsknet.or.jp ** ** http://www.jca.ax.apc.org/~toshi/ ** NO!! WEB RATING (((((((((((^o^)))))))))) --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl