jesse hirsh on Mon, 27 Oct 1997 22:36:59 +0100 (MET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> report: media and democracy in nyc |
---"we are a movement not a market" The Anarchives ---- Volume 4 Issue 8 - The Anarchives ---- Published By --- The Anarchives ---- TAO Communications ------- The Anarchives - www.tao.ca -- Send your e-mail address to get on the list --- Spread The Word Pass This On... --/\-- Cancel All Debt / / \ \ NYC, IFIM, and M&DC ---|--/----\--|--- \/ \/ by jesse hirsh /\______/\ jesse@tao.ca .......................................................................... 23 years after i was born i went to new york city to free the media it was a wild adventure about cultural perspectives and the scarcity of space within a world of excess. i and i travelled by train through the fall of new york state on a journey to reclaim an island 'sold' for a necklace, and built with the paradox of freedom and slavery. whoami? somebody with a stomach ache. i play many characters, and i do this by studying and engaging culture. in the fall of 1997 this translates into the study of network culture, and the liberation of the networks as the basis of all free media. our friends in struggle have made a call, so i and i ride the train gazing soundly on a full moon with a setting sun, casting a light purple sky, highlighting the red, gold, and green trees, that symbolize the fall of new york state. the movement of the social, the movement by and for the people, are organizing their own communications and media. it is with this momentum that i and i arrived in new york city to organize, mobilize, and agitate for a democratic society. rumour had it that a 1000 or so people were gathering in lower manhattan for a so-called congress on what is supposed to be media and democracy. whatever this event was supposed to be, it surely wasn't. all sorts came out of the woodwork to culturally transform the city and themselves in less than a week. the winds of change swept hard throughout the island and the many networks connected to it. this is the story i have experienced with i and i, however i sit now with i and craft the words to describe the phenomenon so you the reader may access another perspective. since returning to my home i have first witnessed a near hurricane wind storm and now as i write there is a fallout of light snow, the world is in shock, and still we are a week until all hallows' eve on the day that i travelled, i awoke with a dream of tension and momentum. i felt many behind me and a strong minority trying to block me. i had a sense of being, coupled with a sense of belonging, all on the verge of becoming. through the network by train i was headed to new york city as nasa launched the casini probe, 73 pounds of plutonium, enough radioactive material to destroy the planet several times over. destruction is in the air although the land demonstrates a resolute beauty accomplished only by the random and determined operations of life. america is a culture of self-destruction mixed with self-absorbtion, this was clear to i and i as soon as we got past tonawanda. for the train ride i encapsulated myself with the book 'global media' by robert mccchesney and edward herman: it's a run down of the mostly american global media giants that are the latest purveyors of hegemony and empire. the authors describe the assets, vision, and tactics of the corporate broadcasters, but they almost completely neglect the telecom companies (the big buck network utilities ready to enact the next wave of media acquisitions), and out of a 200 page book they only spend 8 or so on the resistance to global corporate power. after reading the book i felt as if i and i were the resistance to the global coup d'etat: the antidote to a mortal virus of stagnation and mental negation. off the train on the ground moving into the heart of the city, leaving penn station and walking north up broadway heading for 107th, i and i arrive in times square on columbus day. perpetual persuasion is promised by the light in the middle of the night smothering a crowded town square enabling the spectacle and the distorted reflection of the self. there is little room to breathe or rest and anxiety prompts a quick exit to the east and north. within steps we are in front of transnational corporate headquarters towering into a glowing city night that has no stars save for the blimps and low flying satellites. it was with great speed that we sought out joe friendly and his warm haven just south of harlem. his apartment was full of collectibles, including a full video editing suite, and a big picture of joe with fidel castro, the former with a larger beard and an even bigger smile. joe's a mover in new york city with a standard white van, altered by time and displaying the slogans: 'fidel is so cool, clinton a tool' on the left side, 'cancel all debt' on the back, and 'commercial tv will not give us the truth we need' on the right. joe produces 3 cable access tv shows across new york city as well as doing work with wbai community radio. joe's latest project is a plan for peaceful total revolution (www.pipeline.com/~friendly). mr. friendly helped welcome us to the island with the traditional greetings after which i and i closed our eyes after a long day's journey. tuesday waking to the city the next morning was both disturbing and expected. the sounds never cease and the voices are most often harsh. the buildings resembled hives, and the city thrived with a buzz akin only to intense and co-ordinated hyperactivity. i and i were naturally disoriented and required some form of natural adaptation to a new and hostile environment. quickly after rising we walked from the upper east side to central park and the heart of what felt like an island of destructive excess. putting our hands on the tall and wide trees we saw a land of paradox, of bipolar extremes, a contradicting reality that existed only so far as its contradictions. i and i were travelling through cultural environments and in so doing adapting to each one, allowing ourselves to blend and become part of each. it was with this in mind that we spent our first few hours in new york city sitting and walking through central park. even within this green sanctuary people were still in a hurry as they biked, bladed, and ran from one place to another. the park is the life in the middle of the city that keeps the culture of death from imploding in on itself. the trees are the last anchors on this island, while everyone else runs the rat maze they remain still providing what little breathing air exists in the surrounding concrete jungle. emerging out onto central park south i kept thinking about andrea, and something she told me a few nights earlier, about keeping your head up, and actually looking out ahead when you walk. low and behold the moment that i look up to see the city in front of me, ted turner and tom brokaw walk into the park with a small entourage. i stand for a moment to double-check and verify their identity, true to tv, there they walked, and unable was i to make a quick remark or democratic demand. only in new york as they say. our day long walk took us from the upper reaches of central park, through the eclectic diverse energy of the city down to the lower east side and the fifth street community garden, one of the last few scraps of public space being used for both community and popular needs. on the way to 5th street we stopped in stuyvesant park for a smoke and a rest, taking a moment to watch the city move as those with no homes sat and waited for time to pass. just down the street from the garden is blackout books the anarchist info-shop (www.panix.org/~blackout), where i and i hooked up with a number of fellow travellers from around the way. after a rest we made our way back to the west side and manhattan neighbourhood network (www.mnn.org) on 59th street. there i and i participated in a forum and cablecast put on by access for all (accessforall@tao.ca), a new york based network of activist and community groups working towards greater democratic participation by increasing public accessibility to the means and forums of communication and expression. the facility wherein the forum took place was an amazing public access centre providing training for and access to television production, this of course includes the use of 4 channels on the manhattan cable system. i and i from toronto joined a number of community activists in the main studio to engage in a discussion on public access to media, from television to the internet. it was within this context that we put our minds together to see past the immediate event horizon and transcend the self-interest to reach that ever elusive public interest. how can we employ these communication technologies to better our communities and societies? throughout an evening of discussion it quickly became clear that what we were addressing were concerns of social policy and social work, rather than issues of technology or media. for we use the communication tools to reach our fellow humans, and communicate our own stories in response to others as an ongoing dialogue that draws out social perspectives. what are the effects of emerging network media? how will society be transformed by the shift towards a knowledge based economy and society? one thing is for certain: we just don't know. in fact the unknown seems to be a recurring metaphor of the networked future we face. however what we can identify in the present is a total lack of public consultation and debate concerning the impact and effects of current technological change. when asked what we would like access to i and i respond with clean air, clean water, and a democracy, that being popular and universal access to the decision making process itself. grand notions easier said than done, but nonetheless they are the reasons why we are here and continue to struggle. and it is with this in mind that we continue the discussion well into the early hours of the next morning. wednesday after a short but sound sleep i and i are up again off to begin our day wit= h a picnic brunch in central park, this time joined by our fellow travellers also from our home up north. we exchange our impressions of both the cultur= e and environment of this perplexing island, and our own amazement on how it remains afloat without spontaneously combusting into flames. it is with this sense of amazement that we journey to the metropolitan museum of modern art, socially engineering our way inside with free admission. we travel from egypt to china, from india to greece, through europe into the 20th century, and then back to africa and out the door. as within the networks space and time dissolve in the gallery with the power of movement and the perspective of empire; a palace wired into the spoils and treasures of empire looted through centuries of conquest and colonization. the rest of the day became a blur of travel through the grid, mixed with induced vertigo from the speed and density of the hive's incessant hyperactivity. at the end of the path we found ourselves again in the lower east side drinking beer on B avenue discussing a critical mass of radical individuals combining their efforts and taking back their autonomy and democracy. the american state is largely about self-interest, and the continued enlargement of the self. our efforts towards democracy include organizing against this self-interest under the banner of a larger public interest that transcends any nation state or notion of citizenship. that night i and i are able to connect to the internet for the first time since arriving on the island . the connection induces a weird form of reality shift that instigates a grounding and recontextualization that frames our actions within our own community back home and the larger movement of the social that has carried us to our current position. many things are transpiring, sirens are loud and frequent, as the people desire progressive change. i send an email to aweisman@chass.utoronto.ca that says: crazy shit going on here, earth is moving, stay grounded, knock on wood. thursday the next morning began with a wake and bake in the friendly van moving south on the island along 9th avenue. at one point mr. friendly drove up to a tandem of public schools out on the street for a routine fire drill and yelled with his most poetic voice, "smoke more pot!" to which the primary school booed and the secondary school cheered. it was with surreal time that we arrived at Cooper Union and the first day of activities for the so-called media and democracy so-called congress. the supposed congress was far from what it was billed to be. to coincide with the beginning of the event, the san francisco bay guardian published a number of reports/exposes on funding within the american progressive movement, and explicitly how the institute for alternative journalism, the organizers of the so-called media and democracy so-called congress, had allowed funding organizations to influence their agenda, to the extent of allowing the ceo of one of the corporate sponsors: the body shop to be a key-note speaker in the opening plenary. as a means of ghettoizing the various contingents attending the event, the organizers constructed streams to plug people into, often holding concurrent sessions that were in conflict with each other, or prevented certain participants from engaging with the larger process of the event. while i and i came to the island to agitate for free media, the organizers of the so-called congress waged an agenda 'to professionalize the alternative media' and ensure that they and their fellow self-interested careerists continue to get paid while the rest of the world steadily slips into abject poverty. it was within this context that i and i participated in what was termed the 'activist stream' a seemingly top-down exercise that sought to define 'media activism'. with an emphasis on local and regional organizing we were asked to explore the characteristics, experiences, identity, involvement, and community participation within what was termed media activism. however confusion quickly ensued as few were comfortable with the contradiction of 'media activism' except where it applied to a narrowly defined self-interes= t of success. groups largely from north america detailed their activities and aims to facilitate individuals to participate in collective action that stimulates critical thinking and invigorates progressive change. within the context of media activism this could be translated as: 'engaging the spectacle while demystifying it'. however i and i came out of this forum with the reinforcement that media activism is window dressing on what is actually community activism, or should be the movement for the social. the session which originally was focused towards outcomes and an identified end, gradually evolved into a process-oriented beginning, focused on the events to come over the next few days, weeks, months, and years. after all we are a movement that is just beginning to articulate and organize itself. march against the media moguls so it was with the energy of many friends, old and new, that we the people gathered in times square, in front of the corporate headquarters of viacom, to begin a march to reclaim our public space, our public airwaves, and effectively our public mind. the march was set to visit several new york based media conglomerates and demand that they answer to the court of public opinion and relinquish their assets to popular control. organized by the new york free media alliance, http://artcon.rutgers.edu/papertiger/nyfma/, the street party included ongoing performances by bread and puppets, folk singers, hip-hop artists, activists, academics, workers, artists, and freaks, including i who played the tour guide for the media mogul world tour. as a merry crew of several hundred we paraded through midtown manhattan beginning in times square at viacom, then stopping at disney, news corp, time warner, nbc, cbs, and then ending at the museum of broadcasting. at each stop speakers called for social justice and the return of communications to the people, most notably shank from the prison rap project who also kept the party bumpin' with his radical rhymes. repeatedly the people spoke of the tyranny of corporate rule followed by calls to action and demands for equal rights. related issues such as the MAI (multilateral agreement on investments) and the impending wave of telecom acquisitions were also raised to highlight the context in which the broadcasters in question operated. the people's party walked through the streets of new york surrounded by towers of tyranny that pierced into the sky, symbols of power and stability , champions of the closed and static mind. however the energy that coursed through the diverse and dynamic crowd created a milieu that not only fostered a class consciousness, but enabled this trickster to make a fool of himself in front of several hundred people while creating an enjoyable and humorous environment for the people to take back their freedom and communications. when asked 'on who's authority we were acting?' i and i's response was to read out loud: Article 19 of the universal declaration of human rights: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers." it is time we start examining the right to communicate, and with it the communication of rights. we walked against traffic and police with laughter and drumming. conversations with passers-by were mostly enthusiastic, as we confronted the reigning gods of the nyc spectacle. we need to do these parties in our own cities on a more regular basis, perhaps monthly with critical mass rides? the nyfma has put up a web site for the march: http://artcon.rutgers.edu/papertiger/nyfma/march/march1.html and paper tiger will be releasing a video in addition to citizen vagrom (www.speakeasy.org/citizen) and others. that night we had a curried feast and were filled with the joy of the day. after our meal we returned to the cooper union hall with our signs of protest, only to be confronted by the conference organizers all dressed up in their skinny digs to hear anita roddick ceo of the body shop declare her supposed progressive intentions. after meeting old friends and introducing ourselves to the new, we piled into the friendly van that seeks to cancel all debt and rode uptown to the place we then called home. friday the next morning began with a panel on local media organizing, which included speakers from new york, seattle, los angeles, san francisco, as well as others on the floor from boston, philadelphia, montreal, toronto, woods hole, gainesville, vancouver and elsewhere. i and i all discussed the trials and tribulations mixed with the speed and success by which we try to organize our local independent media to enable a democratic society. it was a feel good meeting, but one that shared space with an understanding of a long uphill path ahead. the panel on local organizing was the first and seemingly last panel of the so-called media and democracy so-called congress, which in spite of appearance and collective belief failed to materialize. in fact what was most overwhelming was the connections being made by and between the people who had come to the island, gathered under the metaphors of media and democracy. Z magazine sponsored a panel called 'what is alternative about alternative media?' which featured 4 speakers: michael albert and lydia sargent from Z magazine, amy goodman from democracy now!, and salim muwakkil from in these times. the panel offered a stark contrast to the rest of the so-called congress discussing issues such as the influence of economics and funding, democracy within the workplace and organizations, racism, sexism, and various other forms of domination within the so-called alternative media. the panel described a process of democratic egalitarian humanism that they perceived as a true alternative to the dominant form of organizing, whether within 'progressive' or 'mainstream' media. at the same time as this panel, the conference organizers held panels on 'building a media and democracy movement' as well as panels on feminist and queer issues; essentially splitting the fringe groups (us) while giving the organizers a panel to discuss the 'media and democracy movement' without the disruptions from i and i the loud-mouthed radicals. once the Z panel opened up to comments and questions from the floor the room quickly gave way to an airing out of frustration over the corporatization of pacifica, the lack of democracy within 'progressive' media, the corruption surrounding the organizers of the conference, and the need for wider 'international' organizing and resistance to dominant corporate media. the Z magazine for october 1997 featured these and many other issues relating to media and democracy (www.lbbs.org). after the meeting on 'alternatives' concluded, many of the participants and attendees then proceeded to a squatted room in the new york university student centre to meet on the subject of international organizing and continued mobilization, and agitation, for a democratic society. approximately 42 people gathered to discuss an initiative at that time called IFIM or the International Feration of Independent Media, a network of networks that had been organizing for what was estimated to be 2 years. a number of organizations were either represented or declared interest in participating in the efforts to create an international organization that brings together the various efforts in the public interest to protect and ensure the rights of all peoples organizing against exploitation and oppression. a number of initiatives were announced that proposed either networks or international organizations that worked towards these and similar aims. However as the discussion opened up there was uncertainty as to a stated purpose, structure, and identity of the group as a whole. A number of people expressed discomfort with the term 'federation', associating it with a distant and centralized power. Other people suggested that perhaps we should call ourselves the International Initiative for Independent Media, seeing that without a recognized structure and clearly defined purpose we were not yet a federation, and perhaps it was premature to call ourselves that. A revealing character of the meeting however was found in the realization that everyone in the room had email, and had pretty much arrived in the room because of their activities or communication online. The group recognized this bias and informally committed to work both on access issues as well as preserving the right to stay offline and be involved. after a lively and open debate on a number of different issues we decided to conclude and meet again in two days to continue discussing how we could work together in a larger context and under a common banner. i and i went from the ifim meeting to a regional videazimut (http://www.tao.ca/videazimut/) meeting held at the paper tiger (tigertv@bway.net) tv offices on lafayette st. with videazimut members from montreal, toronto, new york, san diego, and colorado. we discussed upcoming meetings in seoul korea, berlin germany, and cape town south africa. members discussed their activities, interests, and experiences. also present at the meeting was apc (association for progressive communications) representative mark surman (mark@web.net) who discussed possible co-operation between videazimut and apc, as was occurring between free speech tv (www.fstv.org) and igc.apc.org as well as the co-operation between tao.ca and web.apc.org. this meeting of videazimut was another non-congress event that further detracted and distracted i and i from the main event. any time we did return to the circus' big tent we either met cooler freaks out front or got attitude from the aggressive type-a personality congress organizers. whenever we did make it inside we saw members from the floor either complaining for more space to discuss their own issues, or in the case of the friday night panel, no microphones for the floor to respond at all. friday night had a party in the lower west edge of the island, just south of the twin towers of the world trade centre. a small room in nyu grad residence was filled shoulder to shoulder with partying media radicals from all over celebrating the company of each other and the struggle to breathe clean air in a democratic society. the night became the early morning as we rode uptown with 15 or so people in a van affectionately named 'CANCEL ALL DEBT' weaving through manhattan to bring everyone to their neck of the jungle. when we finally arrived at our haven on 107th we had spent nearly an hour and half partying in a truck on the streets of manhattan. saturday ... downtown to the cooper union. my friend leslie shade was speaking on a panel titled: 'insuring public space: fighting for public access' which examined the social utility of community networks. from there i and i went to the panel on 'international media activism' which featured speakers from videazimut, the ifim, zapatista inspired initiatives, and the london platform for co-operation in communications. while both of these sessions were feel-good panels, i could not connect them with the rest of the so-called congress. they just seemed to be coming from an altogether different energy and source, much more aligned to the public interest rather than some transparent self interest. for lunch i and i met with friends from the damn network (www.tao.ca/earth/damn/), a largely north american initiative to organize a news network to cover and engage in direct action. we discussed similar issues to what was discussed in the ifim meeting, as well as how we related to groups like a-infos (www.tao.ca/ainfos/) and the ifim (www.tao.ca/earth/). we decided to engage in an online decision making process over the next three weeks over the direct@tao.ca email list. also in attendance was tom lane from the a-infos radio project (radio4all.web.net). for the rest of the afternoon, i and i were both exhausted after not receiving a lot of sleep over the previous set of nights, and tired from the hyperactivity induced by the city. we both found separate places to take a prolonged afternoon nap: i in the computer room and i in the 'cancel all debt' truck. we awoke to the closing ceremonies of the so-called congress and the screening of michael moore's soon to be released movie titled: 'the big one'. it was an enjoyable movie with a good mix of humour, direct action, left-wing populism, and democracy, effectively playing off the tensions of elite vs popular representation and perspective. however michael moore joined what was now a loud voice of dissent and expressed indirect criticism of the so called 'media and democracy' so-called 'congress', poking fun directly at the 'media heroes' portion of the closing session, and the yackety-yak-yak of the award winners. outside of the cooper union hall i and i met up with scores of wonderful people who had either attended the event or had recently crashed on word that large numbers of radicals were around and about. i should now mention that this night was also my 23rd birthday, and as i exited the building i was handed a rather large bottle of champagne and invited to a nearby club to celebrate with friends old and new. at the club we danced and celebrated as i wore a mickey mouse hat, surrounded with friends wearing googley-eyed glasses, toasting my mother and wishing a happy birthday to all. for my birthday and in appreciation for the performance as part of the mogul tour, i was given an incredible djembe drum from the members and friends of the new york free media alliance. thank you again. i was in birthday bliss as we rode home with another party in the friendly van calling for the cancellation of all debt, this time with a stop at an organic health food supermarket to pick up a yummy meal for the ride uptown. sunday the next day, our last spent in manhattan proper, was dedicated to meeting about the IFIM. i and i were able to sleep in until nearly eleven am upon which time we drove with mr. friendly to arrive at the ifim meeting a little late as usual. the call for the gathering was met by somewhere near 50 people from many countries and continents, albeit predominantly north america. after spending some time discussing the agenda, meeting structure and duration, the group decided to split into smaller groups to discuss the issues of identity, structure, communication, and future meetings/gatherings. things began fairly slowly and there was some repetition from the previous meeting, but a euphoria fueled most people's efforts and attention spans. in the working group i became part of, we arrived at the name the International Forum for Independent Media. we felt that we were not yet a federation, but that we were already a collection of existing and co-operating networks. to call ourselves a forum was to more accurately describe the initiatives that we already had underway, the environment by which we organized ourselves, and the type of space we sought to create. we identified ourselves as akin to autonomous forms of decentralized participatory organization which operate according to free association. however in the interests of accountability and responsibility we identified the need for a recognized international secretariat and a possible steering or advisory committee that would hold the secretariat accountable. we saw the forum as essentially arising out of communication amongst different peoples and with it the exchange of perspectives. the secretariat would act as both a clearinghouse of related actions, analysis, and information, while also enabling various forms of network and community based communication that facilitate further organizing efforts, explicitly future networks and/or federations to continue what appeared as a timeless struggle for human liberation. we again recognized the influence of the Internet upon our organizing culture and identified the role it would play in aiding the secretariat to carryout forums for communication and organization. however while the communications of the ifim would be largely internet based the message of the forum would also be carried by the spoken and printed word, as well as other forms of media and communication. we also felt that instead of having annual general meetings on the IFIM, that we rather organize local and regional gatherings that are far more accessible to a greater number of community groups and individuals. when the smaller groups again joined to form a larger meeting of the IFIM many of the working groups expressed similar albeit varying concerns. many recognized the need for the discussion to be extended both in time and space to accommodate the participation of others who could not attend that day. much disagreement ensued as to the timeline and current status of the group by the end of the meeting a few decisions were reached concerning the IFIM: -a consulta was to be held until jan 1, 1998 on the nature and character of the IFIM -a working group would be struck to organize and carry out the consulta, they will meet on the email list consulta@tao.ca -tao communications media@tao.ca was recognized as the international secretariat for the IFIM although this wasn't recognized or acknowledged at the IFIM meeting i think that the consulta group is acting as the de facto provisional steering committee and should identify themselves as such. their membership was determined by both attendance at a nearby cafe after the IFIM meeting, and also by their efforts at a latter working group meeting later that same night. i and i decided not to go to the cafe immediately proceeding the IFIM afternoon meeting, but instead were joined by other friends to have dinner at a nearby chinese restaurant. we had a lively and enjoyable dinner, which was followed by a series of regretful but warm goodbyes. i and i took the subway uptown to mr. friendly's apartment, where we shared a last smoke, conducted a few interviews for public access tv, and then departed wishing our new friend joe goodbye while thanking him profusely for allowing us to stay with him while in manhattan. walking down amsterdam ave, lightly playing my djembe drum, i and i reflected on what was a week of hyperactivity and thinking about media, democracy, and society. we bring back energy and momentum to our communities. our vision of our struggle and the path we choose to take is remarkable clearer, a result of our networked efforts and the increased awareness of who we are and where we stand. i and i make a final stop on central park west to participate in a parting tribal jam of words and drum. we are a mixed bag of characters drumming, drinking, smoking, and reading back minutes and written pieces of the past few days. into the early morning we discussed everything from the immediast underground to the future direction of our own local groups. we also discussed the international forum for independent media and our own collective interests in being active in that project. the night ended with shank rapping off the minutes to the afternoon IFIM meeting. with only a few hours before our train is scheduled to depart i and i try to catch some rest. monday we woke up at half past five in the morning and hailed a cab on central park west and sped downtown towards penn station. packing in some bread, bananas, and water, i and i climbed aboard the 12 hour amtrack train to toronto and fell asleep for a good for or five hours. after another few hours we were glad to have access to the geographic illusion that we were leaving the U$A it was if were transcending a cultural milieu that perpetually sought your involvement and enslavement; a cultural perspective that required you to look inward for your being, belonging, and becoming. "although your mind's opaque, try thinking more, if just for your own sake the future still looks good, and you've got time to rectify all the things that you should do what you want to do and go where you're going to, think for yourself 'cause i will be there with you. spread the word and you'll be free, spread the word and be like me, spread the word and think it out, have you heard the word is love, it's the word i'm thinking of, that the word is just the way, it's the word i'm thinking of, and the only word is love, it's so fine; sunshine, the word is love." (John Lennon 1966) "just crazy enough for me to be here, the legendary guy, whatever his name was, he said get yourself into the street, 'cause that's where the party is!" (Jay Terpstra 1997) the anarchives is a journal of spontaneity and creativity intertwined with the desire for a democratic society where all people benefit from equal rights and access to the decision making process as a whole. this issue is a rough draft of my journal notes from a trip i and i took to new york in the fall of 1997. shortly after publishing i will release two more papers as derivatives of this draft: one focusing on the issue of access, and the other focusing on the organizing efforts surrounding the international forum for independent media. the email list media-l@tao.ca is currently being used to discuss this initiative. to join send an email to majordomo@tao.ca with the command 'subscribe media' (no quotes) Jesse Hirsh - jesse@tao.ca - jesse@lglobal.com P.O. Box 108, Station P, Toronto, Canada, M5S 2S8 http://www.tao.ca/~jesse -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQBtAzJ4EpAAAAEDANKD3bcrP+xvDk27ITs5+yrsYkcGBWQeQVjXCyd5stAGWhTg X/PQx7GTH7nEv+fyTyYbIoTvatpAHJG6vrZV2lPGFLhb2S8C1SwfQm2oKC2r+kI1 C6wlYRuMo3m9S78ABQAFEbQaSmVzc2UgSGlyc2ggPGplc3NlQHRhby5jYT6JAHUD BRAyj2oTjKN5vUu/AAUBAaaeAv9OPSdInuLVavqRk2vmlIyu5gm9UGU5yUEIlQJN CXp2qbwOzqTbyhXKNKrF/C/oMCY+OVMQOjz9naOyIcu0ZH3Hroi25aiU4AAYS/Kl DSYeHY6lSPIgN6PISFrJq6MrgYC0EWplc3NlQGxnbG9iYWwuY29t =HVVB -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- -------------------------------------------------------------- To receive the Anarchives via email send a note to Majordomo@tao.ca with the message in the body: subscribe anarchives To get off the list, send to the same address but write: unsubscribe anarchives http://www.tao.ca/thunder/anarchives.html TAO Communications - P.O. Box 108 Station P Toronto Ontario Canada M5S 2S8 --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@icf.de and "info nettime" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@icf.de