Felix Stalder on Sat, 27 Sep 1997 23:40:57 +0200 (MET DST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Re: The User Is The Content |
It is always a bit disappointing to see how deeply WIRED magazine influences the discussion, even among its many opponents. The point I am referring to is the discussion about the famous 'the user is the content' quote. WIRED puts forward a very specific reading of McLuhan, one that indeed stands completely in the line the "Californian Ideology.” However, it is well worth trying to dig a little deeper than the hype snippets and examine what the 'medium is the message and the user is the content' really means. First of all it does not mean that the only important thing is the technology which will empower the user to make the content. However, this is the standard Californian take on it; the user making the content seems also the underlying the hope of Luis Soares. McLuhan used to start with the assumption that "media are neither good, nor bad, nor neutral" and was subsequently primarily concerned with the 'not neutral' part of his own assumption. The lack of the addressing the 'good or bad' question was rooted in a deep disinterest in 'political economy' of media which is one of the main shortcomings of his work. For McLuhan, the medium is an environment. Environment here is not a container that simply holds things and actions; it is rather a set of processes that work and rework everything that happens within that environment. Probing into these processes was at the heart of his project. He investigated their specific effects in different media. The printing press, for example, produced the reader as social prototype. Books and journals, the media produced with the printing press, to shortcut the well-kown argument, effected the specific reshaping to the user's senses, turning him/her into a reader. A "reader" is not simply mean someone who reads, but someone who reads books and papers, and in the course of doing this, develops a particular attitude towards the world: individual, objective, analytical. Again there is normative quality attached to this, objective does not imply 'right'; it means using a specific method. It is an attitude which assumes/creates a (reflexive) distance between the subject and the object (Jacques Ellul, writing at the same time, called it a 'technique'). The fact that ALL books, independent from their content, favour such a distanced hence objectifying attitude (even the most radical post-modern ones) is based on its quality as a medium. The creation of a particular psychological set-up ('tuning the ratio of the senses') is the single most important, and most difficult to understand, effect of media. Therefore, the medium is the message. This does not imply that it doesn't matter what is in a book whether it is good or bad. However, regardless of its content it shapes the user, it is not neutral. If these processes of reworking the senses of the user is the message of the medium, the only point where is message can be expressed, where the 'meta-message' becomes a concrete form is the user, the place where the action is. To prevent any misunderstandings, it is not the user who _makes_ the content, it is the user who, consciously or unconsciously, _is_ the content. The content of the medium book is the individual, the content of the electronic medium is the group, or how McLuhan called it, the tribe; the re-tribalization of the society on a global scale. The physical manifestation of the tribe, especially in McLuhan's somewhat clichéed ethnographic thinking, is the village. Hence the global village. Whether one group is dominating another group, the focus of John Horvath, is a completely different question. The assumption of a village as a necessarily peaceful place reveals nothing than our own projection of a somehow better past. Felix -- |||||||||||||| http://www.fis.utoronto.ca/~stalder |||||||||||||| --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@icf.de and "info nettime" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@icf.de