Linda Wallace on Wed, 30 Jul 1997 09:50:19 +0200 (MET DST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> mahathir mutation |
I don't read this series of posts as an adversarial or oppositional debate (as Peter L. contends) though I thought that Teo's original comment that all previous posts on the issue were 'defending Soros with messianic zeal' was a misreading (or more bluntly, a nonreading) as these largely weren't about Soros at all, but pointers to other ways of thinking about the issue ie other articles/angles which provided more background information. And yes, as Teo says, all media is infected by various vested interests, so it is up to us to attempt to sort the wheat from the chaff, to select credible sources of information in order to piece a more coherent picture together (while also trying to remain alert to one's own assumptions). I think that nettime can be counted on to provide and point to relatively credible information sources. Mackenzie is incisive to describe soros as 'global media virus'. If it is so that Mahathir returned from two months travel whispering the name of George Soros under his breath, and then tried to start a Soros epidemic to do with currency crisis, it appears to have backfired. As to why this thread -- the global soros virus -- was picked up by nettimers, I would argue that it wasn't so much the soros virus but more the fact that it found a home within the Mahathir media virus, where it mutated, launched from the mouth of Mahathir, and then lodged somewhere (or was rejected by) those who responded. One reason that this global soros media virus was so conveniently used by (the extended machine) Mahathir could be the ASEAN leaders' fear/distrust of (further) linkages between human rights issues and trade and investment -- which they successfully lobbied against at a recent GATT round (nb. supported by the Australian government), and now is being played out again by current efforts led by Mahathir/ASEAN for the UN to dilute its charter on human rights. If it is so that Soros has been outspoken in his criticism of Burma, then planting the soros virus into the ASEAN media landscape seems to me a convenient way of killing his voice in the debate (regardless of whether soros was involved in currency speculation or not). Another reason for this mutation by Mahathir of the soros virus over burma indirectly helps keep a lid on discussions that Burma's admittance to ASEAN is a strategic hedge against China. It's ok that this dialogue has caught fire on nettime, lots of interesting comments, pointers etc have emerged -- but I don't think it is so very different to any other thread -- as to why now, it must have been an extended and multifaceted conversation just waiting to happen. linda wallace --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@icf.de and "info nettime" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@icf.de