Re: <nettime> Ten Theses on the Panama Papers

[Brian Holmes <bhcontinentaldrift@gmail.com>]

Nicholas Shaxson has written the so-far definitive book on tax havens, 
entitled Treasure Islands (2012) - a fantastic book, I am amazed no one 
seems to be talking about it right now. His central thesis is that with 
the waning of Empire, British elites sought a way to retain their 
disporoprtionate power - and found it by setting up a complex offshore 
financial circuit based in numerous remaining overseas possessions, such 
as the British Virgin Islands. Shaxson traces this network back to its 
center, the City of London, which has enjoyed extraterritorial 
privileges since the Middle Ages. Most importantly, he shows that 
through its continuous economic competition with the UK, the United 
States has become one vast "treasure island" - effectively obviating 
much of the need for US citizens to park their money overseas (although 
they still do, and the treasure islands are still crucial to many 
tax-avoidance operations).

I respectfully disagree with Patrice and Florian about these leaks. What 
is being "revealed" here are the basic functions of neoliberal 
capitalism, and therefore, the modus operandi of what sociologist Leslie 
Sklair calls "the transnational capitalist class" (the TCC). Since they 
rule, it is clear that their power will not be dissolved in a day. 
Indeed, as is said everywhere in the media, "offshore accounts are 
legal" - because the ruling class effectively writes the law. However, 
since 2008 those laws are slowly being rewritten and the only reason why 
is more understanding of the tremendous harm being done by the TCC. The 
answer to this is not the de-institutionalization that Florian calls for 
(bypassing the press), but rather, a multiplication of institutional 
efforts spurred on and kept honest by global grassroots networked civil 
society. The day when it's possible to say "the TCC" and everyone knows 
what you're talking about, is the day when things will really start to 
change. But for large numbers of people to really "know what you're 
talking about" (and not just spout dangerous populist nonsense like a 
current US presidential candidate) it's going to take a huge educational 
effort from all directions. In my view, if more institutions don't take 
part in that, it's unlikely to happen with the scope and  depth 
required. Anarchy is complementary to, not the opposite of, 
institutionality.

Here's to the Panama Papers, at last,

Brian

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: