Patrice Riemens on Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:19:55 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Internet Governance # 7204 |
In re: Microsoft to shield foreign users? data: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e14ddf70-8390-11e3-aa65-00144feab7de.html#axzz2rIAiaJ5U Expert panel to investigate internet governance http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/52327396-8359-11e3-aa65-00144feab7de.html Both the announcement by Micro$soft that it will keep the data of non-americans out of (immediate) reach of the US authorities and the initiative launched at the Davos WEF to set up a hi-level independant commission to look at Internet governance after 'Snowden' are good news - and not that good news. Starting with the latter, having a committee of foxes and cockerels to discuss how to run the hen-house doesn't strike one at particularly helpful. But OK, it's still a lot better than nothing at all. The really worrying issue is that such committee is likely to look at all kinds of 'problems', advice all kinds of more or less cosmetic 'solutions', and will studiously refrain from poking at the elephant in the room: not the matter, but the purpose of the wall-to-wall carpet of surveillance. Since the argument about 'terrorism' has been irretriviably dented it's clear that it is the population at large which is the target. Being upfront about the why won't come easily, even though it is rather obvious. Now for the good news: whatever you degree of cynicism, the panels are shifting, and it's most probably 'shit's hit the fan' time in the offices of power and business. And of breaking ranks, always a good sign of the former. Of course, one can dismiss it all as eyewash, in which case, if you haven't done so yet, get real really fast and do your bit to reclaim your 'technological sovereignty'. And to embrace its less funky downside: you'll have to settle for considerably less than you get from the commercials & proprietaries, and worse still you'll have to pay - much more - for it. But I think the real issue is about down-sizing 'at all levels and in all departments', as they used to say in 1968 France. And I really mean at all levels, everywhere, big time. May be something to think about. Before being compelled to do so. In much less pleasant circumstances. (Inter)net governance is us. Cheers to all, patrizio & Diiiinooos! # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org