<nettime> Debt As A Public Good, Berlin #BeautifulTrouble Book Launch w/ @AndrewBoyd & @Info_Activism // Attn @BTroublemakers

[Dmytri Kleiner <dk@telekommunisten.net>]

This Thursday, Andrew Boyd{1} will be in town for the Berlin launch of 
Beautiful Trouble{2}, something of an "An encyclopedia for creative 
activism" as described by Sandra Cuff, of the Vancouver Media Co-op. As 
a contributor, I will join Andrew for the launch. Please come and join 
us.
My contributions to the book where on the subject of organizing around 
debt as a political focus. Beyond the two essays in the book, I have 
written quite a bit about this already{3}. The event on Thursday is a 
book launch, not a lecture, so I'll talk for 15 minutes or so, since 
tactics are an important focus in the book, and Andrew will certainly 
cover some of them, I want to try to go a little more theoretical and 
attempt an macroeconomics of debt in 15 minutes. We'll see how it goes.
Here's a bit of primer.

If a modern monetary economy is to have either growth or savings it 
requires a deficit somewhere.
This is not an opinion, or an ideologically biased point of view. It is 
an arithmetic fact based on the what money means in actually existing 
modern economies.
The key identities here are the "Sectoral Balances." The "sectors" are 
private, public, and international. And the three balances in question 
are net private savings,  the total amount the private sector, including 
households, can save, along with the public balance, that is the amount 
the Government taxes minus what it spends, and the "current account 
balance," which the balance between imports and exports.
If you sum these three balances the total is always zero. That is 
because there is only a limited amount of money in the economy at any 
time, and therefore any surplus in one balance must inevitably show up 
as a deficit in another.
If economy needs more money, either because it is growing, or because 
people or corporations want or need to save more, either the budget 
deficit needs to increase or the trade imports need to go down relative 
to exports. If neither of these things happen, then neither economic 
growth, nor increased saving is possible. This is why if wealth is to 
grow, either a government deficit or trade surplus is required. Of 
course, the world as a whole can not have a trade surplus. A trade 
surplus in any nation, must be offset by a trade deficit in another. 
Thus, within a modern monetary economy, the only means for an wealth to 
grow in a balanced trade environment is for the Government to run a 
budgetary deficit.
In other words, if the private sector is carrying too much debt, this 
means the public sector is likely taxing too much or spending too 
little. Government needs to increase it's deficit.
Government spending, and also government borrowing is essential for the 
functioning of our economy. Back in the year 2000, when the economy was 
on over-drive and the US Federal Reserve bank was ratcheting interest 
rates in an attempt to cool down an economy it felt was in overdrive, 
Scott F. Grannis, Chief Economist of a US asset management firm, 
delivered a remarkable paper at the Cato Institute 18th Annual Monetary 
Conference, a right-wing affair co-sponsored by the Economist. Grannis, 
like other fund managers was terrified. What terrified him was that the 
combination of a government budgetary surplus and the fed's tight 
monetary policy would result in a scarcity of government treasuries. 
It's worth quoting him.
Grannis argues "The world needs Treasuries, and would be worse off 
without them.  They are a public good just like our justice system, our 
national defense, and our network of interstate highways. [...]  We 
would be foolish to pay down the national debt." Although Grannis 
interest are ultimately self-serving, the preservation of a risk-free 
investment, his point holds true.  Bill Mitchell reports a similar 
situation taking place on Australia, during a period of budgetary 
surplus the government wanted to "pay down it's debt," and the financial 
industry went ballistic, for fear of a scarcity of risk-free Treasuries 
to hold in their portfolios.
Money, like Treasuries, is simply a form of Public debt. The fact is 
that Public debt, no matter if it's in the form of accounts, currency or 
treasuries, is the basis of the modern monetary economy. We'd all be 
broke without it. Money enters the economy as government spending, and 
exits the economy as tax payments. If the government has a balanced 
budget, no extra money remains in circulation, and there can be no 
increase in private savings. If the Government has a budgetary surplus, 
this means that private wealth is decreased.
For this reason, as Grannis says, "Debt is a Public Good," in the same 
way the infrastructure such as roads create the capacity for transport, 
government debt creates the capacity for commerce. Fiscal policy should 
never be interpreted from the budgetary balance alone, but must always 
keep the Sectoral Balances in mind. The government must spend enough to 
ensure that scarcity of its's debt does not strangle the economy, which 
almost always means it must spend more than it taxes, if it fails to do 
so, then the result would either be economic stagnation or global trade 
imbalances. As we can see from the words of Scott F. Grannis, the 
bankers know this.
While public debt is a public good, private debt is a burden, often a 
crippling one. A sensible fiscal policy would be to use government 
spending to reduce private debt, especially household debt.
Understanding the way the Sectoral Balances function is key to 
understanding what is going on in the economy today. For instance, 
austerity measures reduce the government deficit, which in turn reduces 
private sector savings, or rather, increases private sector debt. 
Imbalances of political power within the private sector, for example 
between corporations and household, mean that the burden of this debt 
mostly born by households. The only way to reduce such household debt is 
either increase corporate debt or increase public debt, or decrease 
trade deficits. This not only explains why household debt is exploding, 
but also explains the Euro crisis. Germany has a large trade surplus, 
thus other countries, like Greece have a trade deficit. If the Euro is 
to be stable, Greece can only decrease its trade deficit if Germany 
increases its budgetary deficit. Somethings got to give.
Organizing around debt means uniting against insane policies that 
promote the interests of rich corporations and rich countries against 
common households and poorer countries. Much of the debt born my 
households and the debt born by peripheral nations is a result of bad 
government and bad economic policy.
To quote The Debtors' Song{4}:

  If us debtors get together,
  all together, every one
  we can heal, and house and teach each other
  and do the work that must be done.

  Them creditors, they don't help us none,
  they just get in the way,
  their profits are what drags us down,
  we must refuse to pay.


Look forward to discussing this with some of you tonight at 
Stammtisch{5} and this Thursday at the Beautiful Trouble Booklaunch!

{1} http://andrewboyd.com/
{2} 
http://beautifultrouble.org/event/beautiful-trouble-book-launch-berlin/
{3} 
http://www.dmytri.info/collected-texts-related-to-the-debtors-party-initiative-updated/
{4} http://www.dmytri.info/debtors-song/
{5} http://bit.ly/buchhandlung

Find this text online for comments and sharing: 
http://www.dmytri.info/debt-as-a-public-good/
--
Dmytri Kleiner
Venture Communist


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org