Andreas Broeckmann on Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:43:49 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> (fwd) Michael J. Gross on the upcoming I.T.U. meeting in Dubai |
interesting read... -a World War 3.0 by Michael Joseph Gross When the Internet was created, decades ago, one thing was inevitable: the war today over how (or whether) to control it, and who should have that power. Battle lines have been drawn between repressive regimes and Western democracies, corporations and customers, hackers and law enforcement. Looking toward a year-end negotiation in Dubai, where 193 nations will gather to revise a U.N. treaty concerning the Internet, Michael Joseph Gross lays out the stakes in a conflict that could split the virtual world as we know it. I. Time Bomb In 1979 the Dubai World Trade Centre dominated the skyline of Dubai City, on the horn of the Arabian Peninsula. Today, the World Trade Centre looks quaint, like an old egg carton stuck into the ground amid a phantasmaÂgoric forest of skyscrapers. But come December the World Trade Centre will once more be the most important place in Dubai Cityâand, for a couple of weeks, one of the more important places in the world. Diplomats from 193 countries will converge there to renegotiate a United Nations treaty called the International Telecommunications Regulations. The sprawling document, which governs telephone, television, and radio networks, may be extended to cover the Internet, raising questions about who should control it, and how. Arrayed on one side will be representatives from the United States and other major Western powers, advocating what many call âInternet freedom,â a plastic concept that has been defined by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as the right to use the Internet to âexpress oneâs views,â to âpeacefully assemble,â and to âseek or shareâ information. The U.S. and most of its allies basically want to keep Internet governance the way it is: run by a small group of technical nonprofit and volunteer organizations, most of them based in the United States. On the other side will be representatives from countries where governments want to place restrictions on how people use the Internet. These include Russia, China, Brazil, India, Iran, and a host of others. All of them have implemented or experimented with more intrusive monitoring of online activities than the U.S. is publicly known to practice. A number of countries have openly called for the creation of a ânew global bodyâ to oversee online policy. At the very least, theyâd like to give the United Nations a great deal more control over the Internet. cont. at http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2012/05/internet-regulation-war-sopa -pipa-defcon-hacking # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org