E. Miller on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:23:40 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> The Sondheim brou-ha-ha: one perspective |
Okay, I'll chime in too. So maybe I'm a bit younger (34) and not exposed to/informed on nearly enough feminist theory. But here's my perspective. For my entire professional career most of my bosses and clients have been women. My business partner (my wife) is a woman. When I was in college, most of my classmates were women. Now that I teach, most of my best students are women. I went to a conference yesterday, and the most compelling and interesting conversation I had was with a woman. Of our circle of friends, many (if not most) of the most driven and successful individuals are women. So when I read stuff (paraphrased) like "this is so oppressing" and "online environments aren't comfortable" and "this experience made this female lawyer cry" (linked material) and so on, it just sounds...Victorian to me. Not that these experiences aren't true, but that the perspective inadvertently reinforces old and out of date stereotypes. Like women are porcelain dolls that need to be protected. Like "hysteria" is still a valid medical diagnosis. Like that female-only fragile personality syndrome still belongs in the DSM. Like bras have yet to be burned. I certainly wouldn't argue that women don't still have a hard time of it; but then again, it's not a warm-and-fuzzy world, not many folks at all (regardless of gender) are going to have a completely conflict/obstacle-free life handed to them, nor maybe should anyone ever have it that easy in the first place. I've known a fair number of people (male and female) who have had an easy time of it, and from my perspective they tend to be a bit dull, or maybe underachievers, without the fire that comes from toughing it out through difficult formative experiences. And I'm not trying to project onto feminist theory, I'm completely unqualified to do so, or that my experience applies to other cultures, situations, or socioeconomic strata. I'm just saying that the arguments haven't struck me as relevant to my personal experience, where women are admirably strong and successful, and arguments that emphasize the fragility of women in a bad, bad environment just sounds to my ears like a throwback to corsets and tales of frequent fainting at the first signs of difficulty in life. Flame on, all. Eric # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net