Newmedia on Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:33:49 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> nettime as idea |
Roberta: When nettime was young, it largely revolved around events. Not ideas. Events. The list was often a discussion of events, publishing of "papers" that were given at events, reports about events, quarrels that took place at events, planning for events. Events were at the center of nettime's life back then. The Metaforum series was central (okay Zentral) to the early growth and excitement of nettime. Indeed, as the history books tell us, nettime was initially formed at an event -- Venice Biennale 1995. These events were planned. Carefully. Then, of course, these events took on their own life as all good events must do. I was introduced to nettime in an email inviting me to come to Metaforum III (October 1996). A plane ticket was offered (fund-raised from a local businessman who wanted some free advice from me) and a "keynote" speech slot was promised. I didn't know Diana, Pit, Geert and Janos when I was contacted. They found me on the net (partly because I "attacked" John Perry Barlow, who had keynoted Metaforum II) and apparently thought that I would say something that would help their event. Hopefully it did. When I got on the plane, there was Eric Davis ("TechGnosis") sitting next to me. He was also invited. We'd never met. So was Manuel Delanda. We also never met. Arthur Kroker was invited but couldn't attend. Likewise for many others. The night before my "speech," I went to dinner with the organizers to go over my presentation. We decided to change some things to directly "confront" some other topics that would also be discussed and to make sure that everything would be lively and challenging. Events are hard work. Especially if you want to throw together some interesting people so that sparks will fly -- in a semi-controlled but tension-filled fashion. Unfortunately (or not according to your perspective), these events were viewed as in conflict with the aggressive efforts by the Soros group to build its own "network" -- recalling that early nettime was highly engaged in bringing people from the "East" (i.e. former communist Eastern Europe) into contact with people from the West -- which inevitably involved many of the same people as nettime. I've been told that it was communicated to some nettimers that they could expect no funding from Soros etal -- remember that the Soros group was then among the only job sources in the territory -- if there was another Metaforum event. For whatever reasons, there were no more. Instead, the Soros organization in Ljubljana (Slovenia) hosted the "final" nettime event -- Beauty and the East -- in May 1997. Once again there were various invited speakers. Peter Lamborn Wilson (aka Hakim Bey) and David Bennehum, among others. Travel expenses were paid and so forth. Nightclubs were rented. Drinks were provided. There was plenty of excitement in the air (and some smoke as I recall.) For the record, Ted Byfield had "given up" on nettime around then. I made a contribution and helped to convince him to come to Ljublana. The rest is, er, not quite (public) history -- yet. I suspect the reason why there has been such an outflowing of commentary about "nettime" (on nettime) in the past week (and the "Ted connection") is simply because there was recently another nettime event. After all these years. If you wish to build something -- call it nettime? -- then you will have to organize some events. The better you organize them, the better you mix things up, the better you get people excited, the better you *plan* and *execute* -- then the better will your results inevitably be. Oh yeah, I came back from "Beast" very excited about where this was all going. Because of the train strike -- which prevented travelling directly from Slovenia to Austria, forcing Ted, David and me to take a train to Germany first -- none of us attended the post-conference ZK meeting. We did however get to stay in the Hotel Orient (as I recall, none of us knew it was already famous due to Ken Anger's 1995 "Love's Last Lament") in Vienna. I suspect that we missed out on something important at that post-event planning session. Perhaps that's where the future of nettime was debated. There were no more major public events. I was involved in organizing two things following that -- Technorealism (which was largely stillborn, when Daddy Warbucks showed up) and the Non-Linear Circle (a "salon" that I hosted in my loft once-a-month for two years, 1998-2000.) As I posted over the years in various ways, the NET is giant surveillance device. Indeed, I believe that it was designed as such by the Pentagon. When I started getting subscribers from Bulgaria on the NLC list (hosted right alongside nettime), I started to wonder exactly who was "tracking" our activities. Of course, this isn't to say that "watchers" can't show up at events -- indeed, the NYPD "Red Squad" sent someone to actively participate in the NLC -- but so much of what happens at events is, well, "private." I'm a big believer in events. I hope that there are some more that I'm privileged to participate in -- make it some good ones! Best, Mark Stahlman New York City # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net