Heiko Recktenwald on Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:13:21 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Three items of possible interest |
Table of Contents: Utah vicious assault on Rave Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@uni-bonn.de> Boy's expulsion for violent rap lyrics overturned Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@uni-bonn.de> Anomalynews Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@uni-bonn.de> ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:14:28 +0200 From: Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@uni-bonn.de> Subject: Utah vicious assault on Rave Well: - -------- Original Message -------- <...> The first report with streaming video I was sent about this event sounded suspicious, and so I contacted the Utah ACLU office directly. They forwarded the links below and verified that it's a real situation, where they're formulating strategy to hold officials responsible. It's too over the top to seem true, but it is. Imagine you were in a church service, peacefully engaging in normal spiritual practices, but another church down the road whose members were most local county government officials and police disliked your manner of spiritual practice. Would you ever expect them to use helicopters and assault rifles, and drop military assault teams out of the sky and start using tear gas, stun guns, dogs, and more to assault, intimidate, and threaten people, nearly all of whom were engaged in completely legal activities, even if a few were engaged in spiritual practices controversial enough to make for Supreme Court litigation as we now see over use of special tea and in the past about Native American practices? A Rave for many participants is a form of ecstatic spiritual practice, like trance drumming, drug aided for some but far from all. As such, it deserves full religious legal protections. That's especially important when Calvinist bigots control many government guns and thugs. Most Raves are held with high secrecy, because of over the top police abuses far less severe than what recently happened in Utah. This one had county mass gathering permits, which according to law weren't actually needed (because it met the time definition in law), but the promoters were trying to play well within the law. Police clearly took a stand that ecstatic music and movement experiences for mostly 20-somethings aren't to be tolerated by Mormons. These people could use legal and public relations help, making a violently abusive county find it very costly to violate civil rights by obnoxious Ninja warrior police predators assaulting kids and treating citizens fully within their rights as if criminals to be kicked, attacked by dogs, kidnapped, slandered and libeled, and generally abused. http://www.music-versus-guns.org/versuspress.html http://www.music-versus-guns.org/versusstatements.html http://www.music-versus-guns.org/versusmedia.html http://www.music-versus-guns.org/versushelp.html http://www.utrave.org/ Terry ---------------------------- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:23:24 +0200 From: Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@uni-bonn.de> Subject: Boy's expulsion for violent rap lyrics overturned And more: Comment: It seems to be typical protestant thinking vs. catholic thinking. The catholics number one is the church, the protestants nomber one is your head. You see this more often, the most prominent victim today is Saddam. - -------- Original Message -------- <...> The major defect I see in cases like this is that school officials are exempt from personal liability for actions that leave scars for years on their targets, even if "succesfully defended". There should be a legal default that this kind of injunction is prima facie evidence of significant civil liability by both school system and individual actors.=20 - -- Terry=20 Boy's expulsion for violent rap lyrics overturned=20 By The Associated Press=20 08.25.05=20 PITTSBURGH =97 A federal judge yesterday overturned the expulsion of a 14-year-old student who wrote profane rap lyrics because the songs, though violent, didn't amount to "true threats" against the boy's school and were therefore protected by the First Amendment. The Riverside Beaver County School District kicked out Anthony Latour because officials believed the lyrics constituted threats to shoot up the school and another student. The American Civil Liberties Union sued on Latour's behalf Aug. 3, claiming the songs were "battle rap" =97 a genre of the street music in which two people try to outrhyme each other, often using violent putdowns. U.S. District Judge Donetta Ambrose issued a preliminary injunction yesterday ordering the district to admit Latour to the ninth grade when classes resume Aug. 31. "If you could punish on words alone without looking at context, you could wipe out the entertainment industry =97 and certainly rap music," said Witold "Vic" Walczak, the Pennsylvania Legal Director of the ACLU. The school district's solicitor, Greg Fox, said officials were disappointed, but would follow the judge's ruling. "Sometimes, perhaps it is better to take the words too seriously than to dismiss them," he said in a statement. "There have been several parents within this school district that felt the songs could not be taken lightly and were very concerned about the safety of their children. That prompted the school officials to take what they thought was the appropriate action." In one song, Latour wrote: "So watch what you say about me, I'm everywhere son / And the word of mouth is that I'm carrying guns / Now that I'm comin' for you =97 what the (expletive) you gonna do / I come double with the pump tons of slugs that will punish you." School officials learned of Latour's writings in March and contacted police, but took no other action pending an investigation by North Sewickley Township police. Police charged Latour, of Ellwood City, with making terroristic threats and harassment, and those charges are still pending. After the charges were filed, Latour was expelled following a six-hour school board hearing in May at which he opted not to speak. Ambrose found the school's argument that Latour's music was threatening was "weakened" by the fact that the school took no immediate steps to investigate the music themselves, including, for example, searching his locker, speaking to his parents or referring Latour to a counselor. Furthermore, Ambrose said school officials didn't present any evidence that the boy's songs disrupted school, as must occur for a student to be punished for speech. "Schools have to be cautious about any warning signs of danger," Walczak said. "But they can do as much harm as good, more harm than good, if they overreact and punish innocent students." Latour still faces an Aug. 31 Beaver County Juvenile Court hearing on the criminal charges. Walczak said that even if Latour were found to be delinquent by the court, that verdict wouldn't be grounds to keep him out of school because the rap songs were composed at his home. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:30:04 +0200 From: Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@uni-bonn.de> Subject: Anomalynews Here is http://www.anomalynews.com/phorum/read.php?f=1&i=388&t=388 maybe somebody can compile the three messages to one. H. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net