Geert Lovink [c] on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:23:34 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> GIEP HAGOORT: ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN A EUROPE BOTTOM UP [u] |
(this is the big debate, wherever you go in europe, creative industries yes or no... so, are you creative yet? /geert) ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN A EUROPE BOTTOM UP mentality and method INTERVIEW WITH GIEP HAGOORT Professor Art & Economics Chairman Research group Art & Economics/Cultural Entrepreneurship Utrecht School of the Arts 1 Entrepreneurial Style "Entrepreneurial style in the cultural sector means: take your own cultural mission as a starting point to look for new chances in your environment. You can do this on your own but my advice is to develop partnerships with other initiatives and existing art organisations. As we know the cultural sector is a low or no budget sector. In my own city, Utrecht, entrepreneurial artists start new initiatives without money in their pocket but with original ideas in the field of art and economics. We call this: doing cultural business with the 'bank-without-money'. I have been working in Central and East Europe for many years and I have seen a lot of examples like in Utrecht. And= I know it is important to have a strong endurance. A complaining attitude is a dangerous pitfall. 2 Cultural entrepreneurship is based on history "Cultural entrepreneurship, as explained in my books and papers, is not a West European or an American approach. It is a real cultural quality with a strong cultural history. Five centuries before Christ there were large-scale Greek festivals based on an entrepreneurial method with a strong managerial structure about artistic judging, sponsoring and audience management. All famous Renaissance artists and cultural managers were entrepreneurs too. Suger developed innovation workshops for renewing churches in Gothic style. Theatre maker Shakespeare, and painters Rubens and Rembrandt had there own private firms. It is not needed to concentrate on general American management concepts which ignore real cultural values. On the contrary: do investigate your own cultural history and art management values. Cultural entrepreneurship is a mentality and a method. It can be used by individual artists and large cultural organisations like museums, theatres, etc. 3 Central and East Europe "Based on my work experiences in Central and East Europe I see a lack of what I mention 'Concepting'. Concepting means: design your artistic dreams in interaction with your environment and develop a long-term plan. Even in the case that you just have an individual project it is important to create a cultural infrastructure around you and to elaborate your ideas into concrete plans. Mainly during the collective drinks after my sessions I emphasize again and again: stop complaining, professionalize your art organisation and make attractive but realistic plans. And stop saying: my town is different. Of course your town is different: deal with that! 4 Creativity is a unique strength "The cultural sector has one unique strength: creativity. In the post communist countries and the old, tired EU-nations only creativity can innovate communities, cities and industries. If the creative sector can re organize itself on the principle of networking, the business world, the bureaucrats and the traditional world of universities know that the answers will come from creativity. But there is one fundamental condition for this success: a flexible and meaningful cultural policy on city, province and national level. It is important that the government takes its own responsibility, in financing, in creating an infrastructure, in taking care of art education and in supporting people to enjoy own art and culture. To plead for a total free market in the cultural sector is based on a big and dangerous misunderstanding about art and its history. In the history of Europe and its rulers there was always a general interest approach for culture. The most important arguments were: quality of live, the status of the residence, the education of the people. I cannot see that these arguments are outdated. Only in the USA the government is denying this responsibility en leaves it to the multimillionaires. But in Europe we do appreciate a more civilized system. 5 Reorientation in Europe "Because of the NON of the French and the NEE of the Dutch against the new EU constitution we will get a fundamental re orientation on the position of the EU in Europe. Together with the Council of Europe with its 46 members, the cultural sector in Europe has to create new strategies. To my opinion the issue of Creative Cities with cultural entrepreneurship and social inclusion will play a key role in those strategies. The growing EU-bureaucracy has to be killed. More and more the artists based practices will colour the discussion about Europe and culture. Europe from bottom up is the motto, top down Europe is dead. 6 Cultural values "If you combine your artistic activities with interesting social, spacial and economic developments in your city of region, cultural values will be appreciated as an important innovative factor. You are on the wrong way if you are isolated and not known in your own environment. In that case my advice is: Please return and go back, create your own path in connection with ideas about creative cities. This is not just a statement but an expression of a lot of experiences: Custard Factory in Birmingham, Hackischen Hofe Berlin, Newcastle Art Centre, Westergasfabriek Amsterdam, Europahuis voor de Kunsten Utrecht. 7 Skills "Nowadays an important skill for art managers is to combine their artistic ambitions with financial and organisational possibilities. In our research group we have developed the concept of Cultural Business Modeling (CBM). This is a professional instrument for developing a mixed financial base for a cultural organisation. We tested four cultural organisations on CBM and there were robust results. Another important skill is to create local, national and international networks. An example of interactive networking is the Europahuis voor de Kunsten Utrecht (Europe House for the Arts), which has to be established in the art deco post office in the centre of the city. We started just with the idea: to create a place for artists living and working in Europe. For the success of this idea it is important that the local artists initiatives and cultural organisations accept this idea and become supporters. Within six month thirty cultural organisations express that such a place is important for Utrecht to become a creative city on a European level. Currently a steering group is formed which will be responsible for the design phase in 2006. Without the network capabilities this step would never be done by artists and art managers. Besides these skills it is in common that artists and art managers professionalize their actions on the strategic, organisational and marketing level. If creative people think they can function without this knowledge they will have real problems in practice. It is necessary that art education - academies, film schools, theatre schools, conservatories =96 educate their students in these fields. For instance project management is an important tool to realize artistic ideas. Without this tool it costs a lot of energy to fulfil artistic tasks. So, art education students have to be trained in these project competences. 8 Projects without an artistic soul: artistic Newspeak. "Projects are important for flexibility and innovation of the creative sector. The project-based method can help you to realize your dreams. But without an artistic core, I mean a fundamental artistic drive; projects are soulless and will have a negative impact on cultural developments. If governmental bureaucracy pleads for 'cultural projects' without having a clear and challenging cultural policy framework, these projects will be empty things. If foreign cultural organisations want to co operate on a project base because the EU-funds ask for at least three foreign partners, it is just creating artistic Newspeak without substance. Artists have to ask themselves what are my own arguments to co operate within international projects. To innovate my way of working? To exchange artistic experiences on an international level? To discover new sources for artistic developments? To perform on a European level? These things are important to consider. Just networking on a project base without an artistic mission is waste of time 9 Small initiatives and Large organizations "As sponsors the big business firms are focused on cultural institutes with a strong status. The advertising world call this A-marks. When a foreign company wants to sponor a cultural organisation, it will support the main theatres or museums. And the government knows this and will also pay extra attention to this cultural accommodations. On this level it is difficult for small organisations to find private money. But there are some possibilities for them to co operate, First of all: create your own bank-without-money, as I mentioned earlier. With the help of this bank you can use empty places in large organisations. Large institutes have always some possibilities but the question is: do the small groups really want to co operate with them? Second: create your own financial fund. Ask your uncle or cousin, who is a lawyer, to form such a fund which will be fed by donations and gifts from the society and the managers from the corporate world. Three: make money by selling your creativity to interesting parties. Again: your unique selling point is your own creativity. Because of the problems of small artists initiatives I develop in my book the concept of guerrilla art management. This will say that artists can create a basic camp for instance within an empty old industrial building and execute small attacks -- in the cultural way of thinking -- on the established cultural world. This new management approach is needed if the established cultural world neglects the spirit of new, innovative cultural groups. 10 Future "When we consider the future, it is necessary to look to the past. In the 20th century we saw a dominant position for existing mono disciplinairy organisations. Museums, opera houses, theatres and cinemas are the icons of this period. Cultural policy was focused on the leading position of these institutes. But in this new 21st century there are fundamental changes in the society: need for creativity in the society, digital communication around Internet, the growth of subcultures and new cultural communities, globalisation. The old leaders have no possibilities and flexibility to deal with these developments. New entrepreneurial initiatives and networks with a strong cultural concept will take over their positions. Fortunately some cultural leaders of the old organisations do have the idea that they have to change their old cultural strategies and competences. These art managers want to become a part of the new networks, which I call the Intercultural Network Organisations (INO). The Heart of the Prague Quadriennial in 2003 directed by Tomas Ziska was an example of an INO. And MAPA in Berlin in 2002 had also elements of an INO. Another example is our own programme to support cultural Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SME) in specific quarters of the city. Each consultant and trainer is focused on the existing cultural organisations in the centre of a city. We conclude that the future of culture will be build on the activities of these interesting SME-organisations which form their ow= n networks in their own environment with a strong European spirit.Our programme with the title 'Cultural SME 2005/2006' supports these organisations and networks to innovate their management. And existing organisations like Chamber of Commerce, Jaarbeurs, universities and art schools are strongly involved. Based on my international activities I can say that this approach can also be important for cities in Central and East Europe like Prague, Kiev and Tbilisi. As you see, the entrepreneurial style of art management is not a closed, scientific system but an open and pro active way of thinking, knowing and doing to innovate the cultural sector on a practical base. It is up to artists and art managers to use its potentials. Summer, 2005 This interview will be discussed during training sessions in Zilina, Helsinki, Prague and Blagoevgrad. www.hku.nl/lectoraatke giep.hagoort@central.hku.nl Giep Hagoort, Art Management Entrepreneurial Style, Eburon, Delft, # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net