Peter Kuhm on Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:22:07 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> mandatory fingerprinting for all EU citizens |
Get up - Sign* up! -> http://www.edri.org/campaigns/biometrics/0411 --- snip --- An Open Letter to the European Parliament on Biometric Registration of all EU Citizens and Residents 26 November, 2004 .. You may still use our webform* to sign this letter; however your signature will not be added to the letter to be sent to Members of the European Parliament any more. All signatures received before Thursday, December 2, will be posted on this website. To the Members of the European Parliament, We the undersigned are calling on you to reject the 'Draft Council Regulation on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States'. This is an unnecessary and rushed policy that will have hazardous effects on Europeans' right to privacy. This policy process requires additional oversight, and the eventual systems established will require significant controls and a strong legal framework to ensure that this is a proportionate response to the war on terrorism. In particular, we call for the removal of the requirement for fingerprinting all EU citizens. We are quite alarmed by the political dynamics at play in this policy decision. o The Council of the European Union pressed the European Parliament into including the Coelho reports on biometric identifiers on the agenda for the mini-session on Wednesday, 1 December 2004. o Behind closed doors on October 25 the Justice and Home Affairs Council decided to introduce mandatory fingerprinting for all EU citizens into the draft regulation. o The Parliament's response to this significant shift in policy is even more alarming: a majority of the Presidents of the Political Groups accepted the claim that the change was not sufficient grounds for the report to be sent back to the LIBE Committee for further consideration. o If the Presidents had refused to accept, the Council would have called for an urgency procedure. o If the Presidents had refused, the Council threatened to delay the introduction of the co-decision procedure for immigration and asylum issues to April 1 instead of January 1.[1] These dynamics are irresponsible and unhealthy for a functioning democratic system. [...] Signed, Gus Hosein - Privacy International Tony Bunyan - Statewatch Andreas Dietl - European Digital Rights [...] --- snap --- *) http://www.edri.org/campaigns/biometrics/sign -- VIBE!AT - Verein für Internet-Benutzer Österreichs <http://www.vibe.at/> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net