geert lovink on Thu, 29 May 2003 14:06:10 +0200 (CEST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> Janos Sugar on The Typewriter of the Illiterate

Interview with János Sugár
By Geert Lovink

The Hungarian artist János Sugár produced a stunning short video piece
about the popular technology of the Kalashnikov machinegun. He used still
photos from mainstream news magazines that are displaying the world's
conflicts and morphed them into one, with the Kalashnikov gun as its
continuous centrepiece. I heard about the video from the Dutch sociologist
Johan Sjerpstra who explained to me why such a minimalist, almost
non-video might be interesting in such an overproduction of images.
Sjerpstra saw the piece for the first time in Mexico City at "Without
emergency exit" exhibition of Centro Multimedia. Sjerpstra was fascinated
by the press photos showing the Kalashnikov that turn into each other. The
centre of the morph is always the gun. He also noted how special the sound
is: the work of a famous jazz drummer, Bobby Previte from NYC, who played
once a jazz drummer in Robert Altman's movie Short Cuts. According to
Sjerpstra the music track of The Typewriter of the Illiterate is a perfect
mixture, a real sound morphing of the sounds of a machine gun and a
typewriter. I interviewed János Sugár after a private screening of the
tape in Sydney.

GL: How did you come up with the idea to make a video piece about the

SJ: I always collected particular images. I call it 'collecting
analogies.' For instance, I take a picture whenever I see a broken shop
window, or a religious graffiti, or a piece of furniture on the street,
etc. I like those series of images, connected only by a similar detail; it
represents a special kind of a narrative. For me it is all about the
foreground/background issue: what we consider important, the foreground is
only a pretext and with the passing time the former background becomes
more interesting. Besides taking pictures with my camera I collect press
images for the same reason. Among many other topics since the beginning of
the 90s I started gathering images of people wearing or using the AK 47
gun I was amazed by the fact that sophisticated weapon systems were never
used, they were built, and they were carefully dismantled later on. They
boosted national economies and the Americans won the Cold War with them.
The development of sophisticated high tech weapons systems has had an
enormous impact on the economies and politics of the world, but, thank
God, they have never been really used. What has actually been in constant
use since the late 40s is the Kalashnikov machine gun. In fifty-five years
the approx. 100 million Kalashnikovs have been built and killed much more
people than the atomic bomb. Its silhouette became the symbol of revolt
and the favorite logo of freedom fighters and terrorists. In Burkina Faso
the Kalashnikov for some years was in the national coat of arms.
Mozambique has the Kalashnikov beside an open book and a spade in the
national flag. In 1995 I had already a large enough collection, but I had
no access to the proper hardware. I started morphing the images, but it
looked too clumsy and complicated. Only six years later technology,
accessible to me, had developed to such an extend that such a simple work
could be realised.

GL: Could you tell us something about the history of this world famous
machine gun?

SJ: The general history of the machine gun is also interesting. When
engineering helpfully solved the technical problem of a fast killing
machine, it was considered so immorally savage that for a while it was
used only in the colonies, just at the end of WW1 was the machine gun used
at the European battlefields. The analogies of the machine gun to the film
camera are also obvious. Paul Virilio writes about this in his famous War
and Cinema book. Nowadays the infamous AK 47 (later AKM) is a fetish, a
cult object, and a successful design piece. Right besides the Jaguar E
type the Kalashnikov should be on display in the New York MoMa's design
show, and in an instant with this two objects we depicted the 20. Century.
The technical specialty of the AKM is its simplicity and efficiency. It
has only a few parts; even a village blacksmith could repair it. But its
other specialty is maybe more important: as a part of the Soviet power
politics, it was licensed to clone, as the IBM PC; it was produced in
twenty countries (including Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Israel,
Egypt) and the Kalashnikov made a bloody carrier as the poorest people_s
master key to the history. The soviets discovered the distribution of
unrest. Need a gun? Here you are. Like selling drugs in the front of a
school. With one loading one can kill twenty people, and in societies
where ambitions cannot have other safety valves, it is an option for
expressing oneself. In Uganda you can have it for a chicken, in Angola for
a sack of rice. It is the Esperanto of aggression. Aggression is a status
symbol, even in the poorest countries. Somalians have a familiar proverb:
"I and Somalia against the world, I and my clan against Somalia, I and my
family against the clan, I and my brother against the family, I against my
brother." Around 50 Million AKMs are in use around the globe.

GL: What do you know about Mr. Kalashnikov himself? Do you see it as a
symbol of Soviet power?

SJ: I have seen him a couple of years ago in a German documentary. My
impression was that he is a rather nice person. He said it is the Germans
fault that he became a weapon designer, the Germans had such a machine gun
and the soviets didn't. He comes from a peasant family of 18 children, he
went to the war (to the Great Patriotic War, as they called it), and in
1941 as a 22 years old wounded tank commander made the first sketches of a
new weapon in a military hospital. Later the experts refused his first
prototype but he was sent to Moscow to study. He did not mentioned there
that his parents were exiled by Stalin, and one of his brothers was in a
forced labour camp for nine years. And he spent most of his life as a
weapon designer living in anonymity in a closed off military area. In some
of his early interviews he made after 1990 he speaks about his concerns
being a weapon maker, feeling somehow guilty, but as he became later a
celebrity he consciously avoids those issues. With his son he produces
mainly hunting weapons, and useful goodies, as lawnmower, fire
extinguisher, sprinkles; and the newest, NATO compatible, 5.56mm AKM.

GL: The title of the piece, Typewriter of the Illiterate, is amazingly
precise and tells half the story. Where did you find the title?

SJ: I found it in a German newsmagazine. Der Spiegel used it as a motto in
an ad for a book of Barry Sanders, professor of English at Pitzer College,
author of: A Is for Ox, The Collapse of Literacy; and the: Rise of
Violence in an Electronic Age and The Private Death of Public Discourse.
He said that the gun is the typewriter of the illiterate, or something
like this, because I had to translate back from German to English, since I
couldn't find the original source. I like the poetical absurdity of this
extremely simple and precise definition. Sanders claims that the
contemporary erosion of our interior space he claims that the contemporary
erosion of our interior space - where the reflective life occurs -
accounts for the decline of private ideas and decent public discourse. Why
has our culture become increasingly violent? The falling apart of
evidencies of identities creates agressivity, and literacy supplies not
just criticism, but empathy too.

GL: Would you relate the widespread use of the Kalishnikov with a rise of
a global civil war, a conflict of 'all against all'? Do you see any use of
the machinegun-type of art? I'd relate the Kalashnikov somehow with remote
conflicts. But then. the gun was used extensively during the 90s Yugoslav
wars. That's pretty close to Budapest. How near is the Kalashnikov?

SJ: Maybe the gun itself not, but the concept of the Kalashnikov is very
near. In the Western hemisphere we have a broad choice of handguns,
Kalashnikov is only the solution for historically unbalanced places, as
one have to use a Landrover in Africa, not a Ferrari. The interesting is
that the Kalashnikov fits into the process as a once special and expensive
product gets cheaper and cheaper through the mass usage. The watch was a
rarity and now you can have it in every corner. In this sense the
Kalashnikov, as the ultimate attention generator, is a similar consumer
product, an element of a certain lifestyle. We live much more in 'an all
against all' situation than ever because the final frontier of all
consumer products is the single individual. Everyone has to have one
photo­video camera, telephone, etc. on his/her body. We are individually
fragmented communication centres, and a gun is indeed one of many possible
direct communication accessories.


János Sugár studied in the Department of Sculpture at the Hungarian
Academy of Fine Arts in Budapest from 1979 to 1984. Between 1980 and 1986,
he was actively involved in the exhibitions and performances of Indigo, an
interdisciplinary art group led by Miklós Erdély. His work includes
installations, performances, as well as film/video. He has exhibited
widely throughout Europe including at the Documenta IX, Kassel (1992),
Manifesta I, Rotterdam (1996). Since 1990, Sugár has been teaching art and
media theory in the Intermedia Department, Hungarian Academy of Fine Arts,
Budapest. He completed an Artslink residency at the Cleveland Institute of
Art in 1994, and fellowships at Experimental Intermedia, New York (1988
and 1999). His films were screened at the Anthology Film Archives in New
York in 1998.


János Sugár 2001, digital video, 8 Min

(Written for the Sarai Reader 3, published in Delhi/Amsterdam:

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: contact: