David Garcia on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 19:26:35 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> The Scuds |
Propaganda we are experiencing is mostly embedded in the language and most of it pretty crude, allied forces are not invaders but "liberators". Fierce fire fights for entrenched Iraqi positions are the "mopping up" "pockets of resistance" and soldiers who do not surrender are "fanatics". The absence of crowds cheering their liberators is the result of the Iraqi terror machine. All this is the established rhetoric which almost all audiences know how to filter. But on the second day of the conflict a "terminological inexactitude" (a lie) with more material consequence seems to gone by unchallenged. It was stated on BBC and CNN that "Scud missiles" had been launched. The troops were even said had to have dug "Scud pits" as shelters. And yet although missiles were indeed launched at no point was there any evidence that they had in fact been Scuds. So what! you might ask, a missile is a missile is a missile. But the distinction is important; Scuds with their medium range capability were an explicitly banned weapon. They were all supposed to have been destroyed. If they had indeed been used by Iraqi forces then they could also be viewed as potential delivery systems for chemical weapons and hence be seen as evidence for the existence of "weapons of mass destruction". The very existence of Scuds alone would have represented the "material breach" desperately sought but never found and would have given grounds for a second UN resolution sanctioning the use of force. The unchallenged use by mainstream broadcasters of the term "Scud" plays a small but significant role in the process of legitimization. Unsurprisingly at no point has any evidence whatsoever been presented that the missiles launched were in fact Scuds, it just left hanging as part of the drip, drip drip from the spin, rumor lie machine. David Garcia # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net