Steve Cisler on Sat, 1 Mar 2003 19:04:13 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Military aircraft Nose Art |
Bruce Sterling's posting led me back to the library. In this case, University of Arizona, which published a history of military aircraft nose art. http://www.library.arizona.edu/noseart/welcome.html The author claims this is a particular American practice, not found on military aircraft in other countries. The golden age was World War II when aircraft were assigned to individual pilots and their crews, and there were no regulations against the practice. During each war the themes changed, and some ignored directives against "unclothed female figures" and in the Vietnam war, theme were more pessimistic: "The personal commitment to the country's cause was often absent, both at home and on the front. This was reflected in the art, whose message centered not on the foe, but rather on the people at home. Some examples of the new themes are "Peace Envoy," and "The Silent Majority" (Ethell, pp. 149-150). Compare these names with "Spirit of '44," a B-17G of the 91st Bomb Group, named for crew's high hopes upon entering World War II (Davis, v. 1, p. 10). The art from the Vietnam era, for example "Protestor's Protector," recorded the public's negative attitude towards the war, even more than in Korea." "Damage, Inc." http://www.library.arizona.edu/noseart/damg.htm The site has an index of images, links to other nose art web sites. What I find interesting is the military commanders trying to suppress it ("only 8 subdued colors may be used") and the crews refusal to comply. Steve # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net