MWP on Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:56:39 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Starbucks vs. Sam Bucks - think you own your name? |
Re. Starbucks vs. Sam Bucks http://portland.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=15309&group=webcast First of all, I have never patronized Starbucks, nor do I ever intend to. (No taste for coffee.) I thoroughly despise with a passion large corporations like Starbucks and Walmart, and go out of my way not to shop there, and so far never have. But I find Samantha Buck's defense as stated somewhat disingenuous. I obviously don't know all the facts, but this is what stands out: Her name is NOT Sam Bucks, but Samantha Buck. It seems to me like she most likely changed her name to make it sound suspiciously similar to Starbucks, especially when she removed the space between "m" and "B" in her name (see photo), and added the totally gratuitous "s" at the end. (Now if she had called it "Sam Buck's," with the appropriate apostrophe insertion, she might have a better case.) The photo in the above link shows just how close the match is. Starbucks did not "plagiarize" anything from Melville. They took the name fair and square - and entirely openly - from a public domain source, and there isn't a court in the world that would say otherwise. I agree that Starbucks is a big, ugly company and that we should stick up for the little guy whenever we can, but let's not make up baseless charges here! I predict Samantha Buck will lose this case, and am not entirely sure that it is the wrong decision. Anyway, there are a lot of complications here that make this story less cut and dry than it may seem, which is the only point I am making. Nobody wants to see the Starbucks empire of evil crumble into a pile of dust more than myself. mp # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net