nettime's_fold@idl.net.au_digest on Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:44:19 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Refugee Embassy Report <nettime> anti-terrorism bill |
Refugee Embassy Report Dave/Ross <fold@idl.net.au> anti-terrorism bill Dave/Ross <fold@idl.net.au> ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:35:52 +1000 From: Dave/Ross <fold@idl.net.au> Subject: Refugee Embassy Report Dave here, on Saturday, 20 April, with a Woomera update. Things have levelled off a bit here. There continue to be radio stations, etc. that call for interviews, as well as a lot of mail to answer. However, Ross and I are starting to have more relaxed evenings together. Our hopes of eventually getting inside to visit detainees took a nosedive this week when Paul Boylan (one of the volunteer lawyers, with whom Ross spoke just before he went to the centre to deliver some gifts to a detainee) was banned from visiting on the grounds that there was glass in the frame of the photo he delivered. (Someone has said that they will ban people for wearing watches with glass in them, or spectacles with glass in them next!) We are hoping to discuss with the lawyers next week how PAUL is going to go about getting the ban reversed. If they, with all their legal expertise and all the media pressure supporting them, are having these problems, and especially if they cannot get the ban reversed, then we have Buckley's chance of getting ours reversed. We have mostly been sending letters (dozens of them) to the detainees this week, but so far it looks like none have gotten through. We paid $10 for a special service where the post office informs the centre manager that he must come in to the post office to sign for a letter (ours to him, which also includes a stack of letters to be delivered to detainees) as proof that he has received it. So far, he has not turned up to collect it. (Could be that he has an idea about who it would be from!) We have heard from others that they have received no mail from Woomera since Easter. Can others let us know how it is going with you? If you have been corresponding with inmates, have you received any mail since Easter? Were you receiving mail BEFORE Easter? We are trying to determine if ALL mail is being intercepted. The same may be the case with people who have been cleared for phone calls to detainees. Have you been able to get through since Easter? Please let us know, so that we will not be guilty of making false assumptions. Nevertheless, with regard to visits, here's the situation as we see it now: Yes, we can stay on here and still accomplish a lot of good, and we pretty much plan to do that. However, rightly or wrongly, our actions have resulted in us getting banned from visiting, and very possibly from writing to or phoning detainees, whether or not they request our visits/mail/phone calls. Some people have criticised us for being too impatient, for speaking out to the media, etc. There is a lot of truth in that. Any true embassy must be extremely diplomatic and tactful. We have not been. But no point in crying over spilt milk, It's possible that we would be no farther along than we are now (possibly even worse off) if we HAD taken the softer line too. Different strokes for different folks. But that should not stop someone ELSE from coming along with a whole new approach, and seeing if they can open the door. Sooner or later we are going to need a replacement up here. Rather than wait until the last minute, we need to advertise that vacancy NOW. I am a writer, and so I have been able to sit in the little room we have here for $85 a week, and do a lot of my normal workload on the laptop computer along with everything else that is going on. Maybe there is someone else in a similar situation (or a housewife, unemployed person, or whatever) who could consider a month or more out here doing what both Ross and I have personally found to be a very satisfying and rewarding job. (There have been a lot of compliments and praise, and we've really enjoyed that too!) Our basic needs have been met by donations, which, hopefully will continue... especially if someone can actually start visiting on a regular basis. I'd pay the expenses myself if I could just to see someone getting inside and giving some regular encouragement to the people in there. So how about some applicants for the position? If you can say that you were NOT at the Easter demonstrations (I don't know whether they would be able to prove otherwise anyway.) it would probably be a plus point for getting official approval. We would like someone who will be happy not to speak "directly" to the media (as I have done), and even to be careful about saying anything too negative here locally. Surely there must be somone who could do this! If you've already been corresponding with someone inside, that too would be a big help in getting started. Now for a budget report. We checked the account on Friday, and there was $925 in it, broken down thusly: $500 from the Hunter Valley Quakers, $250 from the HOPE (Hunter Organism for Peace and Equity) team (I think the Newcastle Uni Students Association may have been the main donor for that.), $100 from Anita and Bob Berghout, and $75 from I'm not sure who. There were a couple of people who said they were going to put a few dollars in, but they may have gone into the wrong account. As long as you gave Westpac Bank the right name (Ross Parry), you should be able to get them to transfer the money to the correct account, if you explain the mistake. The correct account is: Branch No. 735065, Account No. 544823. (The error earlier was that the second "4" appeared as a "9".) It's a Westpac account. Our phone number is 0407-238805. Till next time.... Stay faithful! Love and peace, Dave & Ross ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 07:25:59 +1000 From: Dave/Ross <fold@idl.net.au> Subject: anti-terrorism bill Please cut and paste the following, and send it to: legcon.sen@aph.gov.au For more detail check out http://www.ozpeace.net/ It relates to legislation which could have serious implications for the freedom of the people of Australia, and which is being rushed through the Senate without adequate time for debate. Attn: The Secretary Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee Please accept my submission to the committe on the raft of Terrorist Bills currently under scrutiny. 1. Time & Place As these Bills have such far reaching implications, less than two weeks is insufficient time for Australian citizens and non-Government organisations to fully research and respond to the proposed changes. I ask the committee to: a) request of Parliament a further time period for public consultation; and b)provide detailed briefing notes for public education on the impact of these Bills within a timeframe which would allow full and advised public response. I request that the Committee hold public consultation meetings in all Australian capital cities 2. Definitions The new definition of terrorism is far too broad. All the acts of violence which may be used as a form of terrorism are already illegal under the Criminal Code. There is no need to create a new crime of terrorism. Rather terrorist acts should be prosecuted under the current adequate legislation. The branding of terrorism will be used to justify a range of punitive measures which would not otherwise be tolerated. There is no need for a new offence of terrorism and the existing laws should be used. 3. Banning Organisations This proposal is reminiscent of Menzies' attempt to outlaw the Communist Party in the 1950s. The powers given to the Attorney General are far too broad and would enable him to ban any organisation opposed not only to the Australian Government but supporting any popular people's movement anywhere in the world. The banning of organisations is un-Australian and cuts across the rights to free association that these laws are allegedly designed to protect. 4. Powers of Detention. ASIO should not be given the right to order the detention of persons incommunicado. The right to legal representation and the right to silence are fundamental rights which should never be set aside for any purpose in a democratic society. I would welcome the opportunity to speak on my submission in a public consultation. ------------------------------ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net