Karin Spaink on Sat, 15 Sep 2001 06:22:18 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Re: Islamic Jihad, what is next? |
On 13-09-2001 at 15:43, Brian Holmes kindly wrote: [Felipe's article] > And more generally, for anyone involved in the recent > protest movements: Doesn't this attack make it clear that > we now need to distance ourselves from every kind of > violence, while inquiring more precisely into the origins > of the violence, and denouncing its inevitability under > the current world economic and political system? Yes, perfetcly. But that answer is in itself is very insufficient. Like Arafat does not control all Palestines, yet is held responsible for all their actions, and like the whole range of Islamic falvours and brands are by now conflated into one, *we* can also not control all participants and the counter party will only be too happy to hold us all responsible for what they say or do, no matter wat we say or do. And just like all Moslems are suddenly tarred with the same brush, so will we. - K - -- Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon. - Emmy aka Sproet # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net