integer on 16 Jan 2001 05:06:20 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> [ot] [!nt] \n2+0\ revitalize the 55 list |
nn applauds your exquisite beauty. + kommences 01 180 viraj into the left dream @ 240kmph revitalize the 55 list - YES PL EASE!!!!!! http://plot.bek.no/55/ >From lossius@bek.no Mon Jan 15 08:48:53 2001 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:48:31 +0100 From: Trond Lossius <lossius@bek.no> Reply-To: lossius@bek.no Organization: Bergen senter for elektronisk kunst X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 55@bek.no, "integer@www.god-emil.dk" <integer@www.god-emil.dk> Subject: [Fwd: [max-msp] it's over] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------9FC8231776CC102A7EA52308" So, censorship once more. After all the Max/MSP list did not prove to be the exception to the rule that mailing lists concerned about software should be independent of the software vendor. Time to revitalize the 55 list? nn's reaction is posted at http://www.m9ndfukc.org/cycling74/SSA/ Trond Return-Path: <owner-max-msp@cycling74.com> Received: from synthesisters.com (IDENT:root@114-209.196.17.dellhost.com [209.19 6.17.114] (may be forged)) by plot.bek.no (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA09315 for <lossius@bek.no>; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 12:53:41 +0100 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by synthesisters.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA11111 for max-msp-dump; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 05:27:32 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: synthesisters.com: majordomo set sender to owner-max-m sp@cycling74.com using -f Received: from osirus.host4u.net (osirus.host4u.net [209.150.128.20]) by synthesisters.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA11108 for <max-msp@synthesisters.com>; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 05:27:32 -0500 Received: from snjspop1.snjs.uswestqwest.net (mail1.uswestqwest.net [63.225.143. 185]) by osirus.host4u.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA02410 for <max-msp@cycling74.com>; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 04:59:02 -0600 Received: (qmail 73673 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2001 11:13:14 -0000 Received: from snvadslgw2poola163.snjs.uswestqwest.net (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (168 .103.212.163) by mail1.uswestqwest.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2001 11:13:14 -0000 X-Sender: cycling@sirius.com Message-Id: <v0310280db6859f8e51c1@[192.168.1.2]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 03:21:25 -0800 To: max-msp@cycling74.com From: David Zicarelli <zicarell@cycling74.com> Subject: [max-msp] it's over Sender: owner-max-msp@cycling74.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: max-msp@cycling74.com X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 We have removed the user "netochka nezvanova" from the Max/MSP community discussion site. Additionally, we have blocked all of the domains we believe are controlled by this user from registering for the Max/MSP discussion site. We have reason to believe that the individual or group using this name has initiated legal action against Cycling '74, and it is no longer in our interest to provide a forum for continual attacks against me and my co-workers. It has never been in our interest of course, but we felt there were certain reasons to ignore these attacks and permit "netochka nezvanova" to continue participating here. Those reasons have now disappeared, as I will discuss below. Whether or not there is actually any legal action taken against us is immaterial. If you object to this action, you are free to start your own Max/MSP discussion list. I will not participate in any list in which "netochka nezvanova" participates, and I will discourage my co-workers from doing so as well. If any individual posts anything "netochka nezvanova" writes to our discussion, they will be similarly removed. If thatinsons I felt it was worth allowing "netochka nezvanova" to participate here. First, "she" had developed software based in Max/MSP and desired to share it with others. It seemed wrong to me to keep people from learning about it. That was a while ago. Everyone who participates here knows about Nato now. There have been Nato workshops, concerts, discussion lists, and Nato is now distributed by IRCAM and V2. "She" doesn't need our "help" anymore, and from all appearances there is a very low percentage of the material submitted to the list that actually concerns the software. There is a mailing list for support of Nato users in addition to at least two lists run by other parties where Nato is discussed. None of this existed when we decided to take the list over and allow "her" participation. Second, after "she" was thrown off the McGill list, "she" intiated what could best be described as a terror campaign that included spam to anyone who posted to the Max list, denial of service attacks, and threatening and slanderous e-mail sent to random individuals at McGill. I didn't see any point to subjecting myself and my co-workers to this type of harrassment. However, it turns out that many of these acts are felonies. If this behavior recommences, the victims of the behavior can pursue legal remedies, and I would strongly suggest they do so. Third, a lot of people complained to me about the fact that the price of Nato was being held "hostage" until "netochka nezvanova" was again allowed to participate in the Max mailing list. I was supposed to do something about this. Presumably all of these people have purchased their software by now. In any case, the price of Nato has nothing to do with whether "netochka nezvanova" participates in the Max list, and it never did. We do not control the price of Nato. I want to apologize to all of you who have had to put up with the presence of "netochka nezvanova" during our management of this discussion service. We will try to do better. David Z. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net