<nettime> 2000 Annual Report (for nettime@bbs.thing.net): eToys is dead! Long live chocolates!

[RTMark Reporting <announce0017@rtmark.com>]

   This message is not commercial. Get off our list by writing
   mailto:remove@rtmark.com?subject=nettime@bbs.thing.net.

December 29, 2000 (first anniversary of victory over eToys)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

IMPOSTURE, PREDATION MARK 2000 TONE
The WTO becomes honest, children get "tough love" from corporate 
predators, and the elections really were auctioned off after all


At RTMark, the rough-and-tumble Year 2000 was dominated by significant 
cultural payoffs, as well as one obvious failure.

And preparing the way for the year's funniest moment was RTMark's first-
quarter transfer of Gatt.org (http://rtmark.com/gatt.html) to a group of 
impostors known as The Yes Men (http://www.theyesmen.org/wto/), who have 
maintained the site ever since.

IMPOSTORS MAKE THE WTO HONEST

The transfer paid off in May, when an organizer of a conference for 
lawyers specializing in international trade matters visited Gatt.org and, 
without reading the text very closely, clicked "Contact" to invite WTO 
Director-General Mike Moore to speak. "Moore" declined but offered to send 
a substitute.

In late October, one Dr. Andreas Bichlbauer (actually Veshengo Phuridili, 
a Yes Man) spoke at the conference. His lecture described the WTO's ideas 
and ultimate aims in terms that were horrifyingly stark--suggesting, for 
example, the replacement of inefficient democratic institutions like 
elections with private-sector solutions like Voteauction.com, an Internet 
startup selling votes to the highest corporate bidder.

None of the lawyers in attendance expressed dismay at Dr. Bichlbauer's 
proposals, which The Yes Men have posted, along with all correspondence, 
at http://www.theyesmen.org/wto/. They are currently preparing video 
documentation of the lecture, questions, staged pieing, and lunch.

A DOWNTURN FOR A DEMOCRACY

Voteauction.com (http://rtmark.com/voteauction.html), the "private-sector 
solution" of which Dr. Bichlbauer spoke, itself formed the largest 
dividend of 2000 for the RTMark investor. Newspaper and TV journalists who 
covered the story often found ways to mention that corporations already 
buy votes--exactly the point founder James Baumgartner had hoped would be 
made. (Baumgartner is currently planning a spring lecture tour to help 
defray legal costs he incurred fighting lawsuits before the ACLU came to 
his rescue. He can be reached at mailto:voteauction@mail.com.)

But 2000 was certainly not all free speech and good luck. And the year's 
biggest disappointment began with 1999's biggest triumph.

ETOYS IS DEAD (NEARLY)! LONG LIVE FERRERO!

One year ago today, eToys capitulated to activist pressure--which some say 
had helped drive down its stock price, recently sighted at $0.03--and 
officially gave up its attempt to steal an art group's domain name 
(http://rtmark.com/etoy.html). 

Many activists hailed this triumph--lately punctuated by the announcement 
of eToys' looming bankruptcy--as a lesson to other corporations that might 
consider taking what is not rightfully theirs. When Autodesk suddenly 
relented from a similar attack, many felt the lesson had been well learned 
(http://rtmark.com/autodesk.html).

But unfortunately, corporations do not learn lessons that are not written 
in law. Many of the entities that were fighting for their lives last 
December 29 have been forced out of existence by their predators, even 
before eToys; a few others are still fighting, at ever growing expense 
(Healthnet.org, Leonardo Magazine, etc.); and dozens of new cases have 
been brought to RTMark's attention.

In these days of privatized education, it should perhaps come as no 
surprise that some of the new attacks are against children: Warner 
Brothers, for example, is going after a fifteen-year-old girl for her 
Harry Potter fan site, and Ferrero, which makes "Kinder Surprise" 
chocolate eggs, is attempting to hijack the domain of an Austrian 
children's charity ("Kinder" means "children" in German).

"Public outrage without legal backup isn't enough," said Rita Mae Rakoczi, 
lawyer and RTMark spokesperson. "eToys was beaten outside the courtroom, 
but as a result nothing was written in stone, and companies know they can 
still get away with this sort of behavior--not to mention much worse. The 
only solution is to pass laws protecting people from corporate assault, 
and to rescind laws doing the opposite."

See http://rtmark.com/netabuse.html for more on these cases and others.

ON THE HORIZON

To recover from these indications of colossal failure--which would portend 
doom for less well-anchored startups--an exciting array of cultural treats 
is in store for 2001.

* One German project (http://www.deportation-alliance.com/lh/english.html)
  has already forced a major airline into reconsidering its lucrative but 
  horrible transportation practices; this project is being adapted to the 
  U.S. market with RTMark's help, and public participation will be 
  requested at some point within the first quarter.

* Given the different impacts of corporate abuse in different parts of the 
  world, RTMark will be developing its first full-fledged regional mutual 
  funds in 2001. The first will focus on France, whose population has 
  resisted the push of globalization in unique ways--including by not 
  learning English. The fund will be accompanied by a nearly complete 
  translation of RTMark.com into French, and will be unveiled within the 
  first quarter by its celebrity manager.

* RTMark's communication infrastructure will be overhauled in the first 
  and second quarters. Subscribers will be able to choose from a menu of 
  regular updates--on project additions, new investments in particular 
  projects or funds, developments in specific areas of interest, etc. 
  Also, an online payment system will be made available to facilitate 
  small investments in projects and funds.

Of course, in the cultural-profit as in the financial-profit sector, there 
is no predicting what new actions may prove necessary in order to push the 
bottom line in 2001.

CORPORATE POETRY BREAKTHROUGHS

Last but not least, Andrei Codrescu has announced the co-winners of this 
year's Corporate Poetry Contest (http://rtmark.com/corpoetry.html): 
Amazon.com in correspondence with Daniel Arp, and three managers overheard 
by temp worker Missy Chimovitz. An excerpt from one of the latter:

   You can play it two sides to the middle...
   I really want to know your thoughts--
   I'm game to making some internal adjustments,
   Because I really want to wrap my arms around this thing. 

Suggestions for prizes to be sent to the hapless winners are currently 
being solicited.


RTMark's primary goal is to publicize corporate subversion of the 
democratic process. To this end it acts as a clearinghouse for anti-
corporate projects.

                             # 30 #

   This message is not commercial. Get off our list by writing
   mailto:remove@rtmark.com?subject=nettime@bbs.thing.net.

   If you are receiving multiple copies of this release and would prefer 
   to receive only one, remove as above all address versions but one.

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net