Erik Haines on Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:05:03 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> tracking sci-fi futurists |
>A friend of mine is making a documentary on resistance to corporations, > >and I'm helping. I think he needs to interview some sci-fi future > >thinking types with an activist vision or outlook. Not just the ngos > >using the net to organize, but also those using the net or ideas it > >represents to transform the future. The net, as various people have said, doesn't "represent" anything, really; it's a mirror. (Or we could invoke Tom Lehrer's comment that life, and by extension the net, is like a toilet: what you get out of it depends on what you put into it. :)) If you consider the net to represent decentralization, or democratization, the Zapatistas of Mexico may provoke some thought. If you're not familiar with them, they've been fighting the Mexican government (and the multinationals whose will it enforces) for some six years now, in a networked, mediated propaganda conflict as well as a more conventional guerilla manner. They exhibit not only the decentralized, "anarchic" nature of the net, but also its fluidity. There's an extensive report by the Rand Corporation (the title is something like "The Zapatista Social Netwar") that you can find in pdf format on Rand's website. As I'm sure you know, Rand is a creature of the US Pentagon, so they see the unconventional tactics of the Zapatistas as a menace to be countered, and their reporting is correspondingly biased. You should also check out the Zapatista website at www.ezln.org. Another, less netty, but still interesting movement is the local development and empowerment scene, where inner cities and other areas that have effectively been cut off from the mainstream economic grid are attempting to develop their own economies, with a measure of autonomy, and in some cases even local currencies. Along with the Zapatistas, these are the ultimate corporate resisters: although the corporate power structure doesn't employ them, it does its best to suck every last drop of money out of their communities, and they're very hip to that fact. These people are very much about bottom-up, grass (if not glass) roots democracy and, obviously, decentralization. Sometimes they are also very high tech, surprisingly so when many of the people in their commmunities may not even be print literate. The Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative (www.dsni.org), here in my home city of Boston, might be a useful or interesting example of such a group. I believe they have some links to other groups. I've had a lot of long arguments with friends about how to best oppose corporate power. In the end, perhaps the only way is to deprive the corporations of enough money and labor that they collapse. The best way I can think of to do that is to create a parallel economic structure that _doesn't_ exploit the workers or destroy the environment, that really meets people's needs and gives them fulfilling lives. The net would be enormously useful in creating and maintaining such a structure. But (time for another cliche) it is just another tool. There's no sense organizing one's future around tools; any future worth living in is going to be organized around people. I've never posted to this list before, so I hope I'm doing this right. I also hope I haven't grossly misinterpreted your question and posted a wad of useless trash. :) ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net