adam on Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:48:01 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Should Open SOurce Developers help the US prepare forWar..???! |
this is a really interesting idea, its seems to me somehow similar to the 'no hate language' clause that many apply informally to limiting freedom of speech... a 'not for military use' clause as part of the GPL? hmmm...a double edged sword.... adam On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, . __ . wrote: > > The idea is somehow absurd... but in the end it is open source, which > means that anybody should be allowed to use it... this is an important > regulative process for "official" power and helps keep the balance... even > if I can understand the problems with cryptographic software, like with > PGP, as pointed out in the article... > > But in the end, if we abolish all the rights which are the fundament of > democracy, especially the privacy laws, then the terrorists would have won > anyway... > > What do you think?! > > Cheers, > > g > > > > **** > > http://newsforge.com/newsforge/03/02/25/195228.shtml?tid=4 > > - By <http://roblimo.com>Robin 'Roblimo' Miller - > > This article is based on an IRC interview with Anthony L. Awtrey, vice > president of <http://idealcorp.com/>I.D.E.A.L. Technology, who has worked > on some of the (Open Source-based) simulation software used to train > <http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/uh-60.htm>Blackhawk helicopter > pilots, along with other projects that help the U.S. military prepare for > Iraq and <http://www.army.mil/vision/index.html>future combat missions. > Some Linux and Free/Open Source developers > <http://www.student.wau.nl/~olivier/antiwar/>may not support current U.S. > military goals in the Middle East, but Awtrey does -- and for very > personal reasons, as you'll see from his words, which NewsForge has edited > (very lightly) only for grammar and clarity, not for content. > > Please note that Mr. Awtrey is speaking personally here rather than on > behalf of I.D.E.A.L. Technologies. For more about what he and others have > done with Open Source for the U.S. Department of Defense, please see this > link: <http://linuxworld.idealcorp.com/>LinuxWorld Conference & Expo > Presentation. > > NewsForge: Some Free Software and GPL supporters (and many coders) are > virulently anti-war, and many are specifically against the U.S. invading > Iraq. One well-regarded project, <http://bluefish.openoffice.nl>Bluefish, > has a link on its site to an anti-war page. Could the use of popular GPL > and Free Software packages in what many people overseas view as the "U.S. > War Machine" cause strife and dissension among Free Software developers? > > Awtrey: I think the debate has caused strife and dissension in groups with > less cohesion than Free Software / Open Source groups have. The chance of > us avoiding some level of public debate on the issue seems unavoidable. > > The war issue has an amazing ability to polarize opinion. There are people > with good hearts and good intentions on both sides. My wife was born in > Iraq and her family moved here to escape Saddam and the Baath party 30 > years ago. > > This makes the issue especially touchy around here. > > She and her family hate Saddam. They have stories that would curl your > toes about him and his psychopathic offspring Uday. It is not uncommon for > people who make a quiet joke at a party on Friday to disappear with all > their family, including cousins, before the weekend is over. They have no > due process, they have no court to appeal to, the people are simply gone > and never come back. > > NewsForge: I take it, then, that you and your wife have no problem with > the U.S. invading Iraq? > > Awtrey: When people tell me that civilians will die in a war, I tell them > that Saddam has already spilled more Iraqi blood than any aggressor. He is > not a polite, reasonable man. He kills without thought. His son Uday rapes > little girls and chops off the heads of prostitutes on the street. > > War or no war, this man needs killing like a rabid dog. And Iraq needs to > be free. > > My wife, Hala, doesn't like George Bush Sr. or Jr. She remembers a time > when George Bush Sr. was at the CIA and paid Saddam during the war with > Iran. That war would be like a war between Florida and Georgia. Most of > the actual people of the countries are related in some way. Politics > aside, if there were a button she could push and kill just Saddam, she or > any member of her family would push it. It's a hard decision when you know > "the Iraqi people" as cousins, aunts, uncles, and have to risk them to > save the country in the long term. She doesn't want her family hurt any > more by anyone. Saddam is a little hurt every day, the war is a larger > hurt, but likely a shorter period of time. The devil you know? The devil > you don't? It's a hard choice. > > NewsForge:The problem -- to some -- with GPL-licensed software is the fact > that anyone can use it. How would you feel seeing some of your code used > by Saddam Hussein's people. Or Osama bin Laden's? Or by the Chinese > government to help prevent full Internet access? > > Awtrey: No clear opinions yet. > > I know there have been reports of them using PGP / GPG to encrypt > messages. That has to give Phil Zimmermann the shivers sometimes. One of > the things life in America has taught me is that the words spoken by a > racist skinhead are just as important as the words I speak. It doesn't > mean I agree with them, it means that the right to speak is important, not > what is said. If Free Software is about Free Speech, then we have to suck > up the fact that people will use our code for things we don't agree with. > I don't agree with drug use, but that doesn't stop drug dealers from using > Apache or Mozilla or GPG. I can only state what I am for; peace, goodness, > truth. > > I am with a crowd of people making statements. I hope that the sounds we > make together are mostly peace, goodness, truth when heard by others, but > all I can control is my own voice. > > w > > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net > Adam Hyde The Streaming Suitcase Free as in 'media' +44 (0)7919 847 023 _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold