Plasma Studii on Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:53:05 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] RE: RHIZOME_RAW: GENERATION FLASH (3A / 3) |
>SECOND, I think that "software artwork" needs to be subdivided >somewhat. I think the net/not-net debate is less important than the >interactive/non-interactive debate. We are living in a moment where we >see an increasing number of artist-programmers whose work manifests as >either "Autonomous Algorithm" or "Interactive Experience". Exactly. The act of creating a thing to show others is vastly different that creating a thing for others to use. They are not remotely similar yet people steeped in traditional media constantly think you can just dump interactive work to video. That's fine, but it will sit there until it receives a mouse click, which may be a while, depending on your VCR. The web is just a big storage system, we all have easy access to. (If Joe Shmoe in Madagascar wants to see my work, it's going to be a LOT easier to email the URL than to bring him into the studio in NY) But with the added support for generating buzz words and completely bogus hype. judson ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PLASMA STUDII http://plasmastudii.org 223 E 10th Street PMB 130 New York, NY 10003 _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold