I'm partly with you - I _don't_ have time for these
discussions, but I need them badly - and partly against your
point. It is clear that sustainability comes at a price, but
doesn't this indicate that future developments in the
autonomous field should work on a more temporary, nomadic
level? Maybe it's a question of recognising and accepting the
limits of autonomy, and moving within them.
It's quite an issue, which was deeply discussed at a recent
summit at the Madrid Medialab (Inke Arns, Peter Kluitenmberg,
Sebastian Luetgert, etc.)It's perfectly clear that _any_
project has a limited useful life-span, so long-term
sustainability might not turn out to be the paradise we
imagine. At the same time, it is important to know at which
point is a project to be abandoned, and when to move on.
What I'm trying to imagine is some kind of sustained activity
which could materialise in a series of static, strategic
projects with a limited lifespan. I'm still only trying,
though
Tu correo gratis
en MixMail
¡Haz amigos!: Cita Ciega
_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold