david turgeon on Thu, 7 Mar 2002 20:29:02 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> net?art survey |
>So which is it? > netart > net.art > net-art > net art basically the question is: what meaning does punctuation have? a dot used to mean something purely utilitarian such as "this sentence stops" or "this is an abbreviation". OO programming, & internet addressing, use dots in new contexts (they denote a hierarchy), so it doesn't seem so unusual to call something "net.art" although using periods is a "wrong" way to form a neologism. in this sense "net-art" is more correct but it is (to me) far more awkward (& perhaps inaccurate because of its obsolescence) than "net art" or "netart" which both seem more flexible. another interesting aspect of the use of the dot in "net.art" is that it somehow turns the internet naming hierarchy on its head. a correct internet address should be "art.net", so "net.art" gives the feeling that it's the network that runs through art rather than the other way around. on the other hand, if we follow OO conventions, we get the method "art" as an element of the object "net", which is more cynical than the previous interpretation. on the other hand, it implies that "art" would exist in other contexts: kitchen.art, computer.art, land.art... it posits "art" as a transient property of everything. perhaps the period is eventually going to replace the hyphen in our vocabulary. stranger things have happened. we can also think of a language where words can be lumped together with dots, as with OO programming, but i'll leave that to the scholars out there. with all that being said, personally i have a fondness for the variety of spellings, & i would find it a waste to make one of them "official." have a nice day ~ david _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold