Nmherman on Mon, 4 Mar 2002 19:15:02 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Understanding Netochka Nezvanova |
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/books/0140444556/reader/6 /104-1654750-8500746 First of all it takes a serious literary standpoint, being in the state of what Keats' called "negative capability" in his representative/poetic working manifesto of Romanticism. For me the point is not really what Keats wrote but what "negative capability" means about creativity and generalism. My theoretical method so to speak is exotericism. It's a planned choice-preference that I didn't invent, is not a figment of my extrapolation. Exoteric is the opposite of esoteric, and means essentially "knowledge that tends to be known by many rather than tending to be known by few is better, other things being equal." NN is saying something very serious and literary when she says "romanticism is one colonial disease." It's a very apt statement. A simply stated metaphor using a felicity of phrasing--the classic New Critical attribute of two gentlemen Shakespeare and Keats--indicates the person is taking negative c apability seriously, which in my opinion is one aspect of a very good writer. Most quid pro quo a topic at least in a writer's daily thoughts. Agree or disagree? Positive or negative? In any event I didn't get any illumination or new news from the Salon piece. Also it is interesting to note the book "War and Peace" these days. Anyone here actually read it? Do you think about it these days, or leave that to the experts? The novel is fun to read and good to have read. When Norman Mailer went to study writing, a Swiss instructor made him hand-copy every word of W&P for like six months.) Tolstoy's fabulistic novel has whole sections about the war--noticeably absent of moral blame--interspersed with sections about how history is more or less a force of God, not individuals. He later of course became a primitivist of sorts and asked that all his books be burned. Or, advertisers act smarter than you and teachers act dumber? On a separate note, I should say I was more struck by the fact that nn was in "Salon" whatever that is, a fancy magazine, than what was written by the reporter and in reply by nn. I was once a receptionist at a bank and got an autograph from another woman on the top 25 list 2000, sort of as personal research on celebrity. So, "celebrity is weird" is one major topic I thought about when I read the Salon article. Also all the acrimony is weird, so to speak, and I don't just mean over who gets to wear the fancy dresses and all. Max Herman www.weatesand.net Proof I'm an Artist in My Own Right at http://66.39.32.223/fulfillment/ Free Hype Slogan for Nike: "Creativity is at the center of a basketball." ++ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold