Eric Miller on Thu, 15 Nov 2001 22:47:01 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> structural violence


I agree that this definition of "structural violence" is confusing and 
inflexible.  On a more fundamental level, by defining "violence" so 
broadly, doesn't it devalue the power of the word?

I think that most individuals have a very concrete concept of what 
"violence" is...it's the act of physically inflicting pain, and connotes 
malicious intent.  Neither one of these conditions are met when we discuss 
the unfortunate consequences of inaction.

But to me, this definition is deliberately cast wider in order to assign 
responsibility to institutions, rather than acknowledging the sad truth 
that bad things happen in the world.  Doesn't this definition serve to 
anthropomorphize the source of a "violent" act, and gain legitimacy by 
attributing personal intent to what would otherwise be a coincidence or an 
unrelated event?

By no means would I absolve governments/corporations/societies of their 
responsibilities or the consequences of their actions.  But at the same 
time, I don't see the value in assigning responsibility based on 
institutional status rather than culpability.

>What does the concept of "structural violence" have to do with terrorism?
>First, the nutshell definition, complete with critical proviso (or way
>out):
>
>"Popularized by the Norwegian sociologist Johan Galtung, the idea of
>structural violence involves a wide construal of violence aimed at showing
>that its menace is present in institutional ways even where no literal or
>'narrow' violence occurs. Structural violence does not involve agents
>inflicting damage by force, but is equivalent to social injustice. Apart
>from its potentiality for confusion, a key problem with the concept is its
>dubious suggestion that a variety of apparently quite different social
>problems are all essentially the same and will therefore yield to the one
>approach."
>
>Oxford companion to philosophy, from: http://www.xrefer.com/entry/553621


_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold